Medieval Mafia - Game Over

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #200 (ISO) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:03 am

Yosarian2 wrote:On a side note: DGB, I count 8 people voting Zwet, and there were 8 votes on him in the votecount. Will this double vote thing show up in the votecount, or is there actually one more vote on him then is showing up now? That would make him at lynch -1.

I sent in a choice in case it counted on Day 1, but I guess with the game starting on Day 1, it's probably not a valid choice.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #201 (ISO) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:19 am

I did my homework.

There are three players fully aware of zwet's meta, namely,

Jebus, poptajo, and myself.

Poptajo and myself are struggling to defend the pretty much indefensible zwet. Jebus, in the meantime, is making himself scarce. He has posted only once, while being very very active in another ongoing game.

I say that Jebus is scum. Quite possibly with TSQ.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #202 (ISO) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:22 am

My role PM says martyr.

Caboose · Post Post #203 (ISO) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:28 am

I don't know whether to buy zwet's roleclaim or not...

crywolf20084 · Post Post #204 (ISO) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:30 am

I'm inclined to not believe it, but i'm following the conversation very closely.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #205 (ISO) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:33 am

crywolf20084 wrote:I'm inclined to not believe it, but i'm following the conversation very closely.

What do you think of Jebus' disappearance?

crywolf20084 · Post Post #206 (ISO) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:34 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:
crywolf20084 wrote:I'm inclined to not believe it, but i'm following the conversation very closely.
What do you think of Jebus' disappearance?

That doesn't bode well to me either, but the length and the conversation upon the return will be what i'll watch more closely.

Caboose · Post Post #207 (ISO) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:39 am

I'm buying the zwet claim.

Unvote

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #208 (ISO) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:43 am

camn · Post Post #209 (ISO) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:01 am

zwetschenwasser wrote:Why?

Hey.
Why did you claim twice?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #210 (ISO) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:03 am

Because it brought some crazy reactions.

Caboose · Post Post #211 (ISO) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:25 am

zwetschenwasser wrote:Why?

I have role-based info that leads me to believe that your claim is true.

OhGodMyLife · Post Post #212 (ISO) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:43 am

Vote Count:

10 to lynch

zwetschenwasser: 7 (hasdgfas, Thestatusquo, qwints, Yosarian2, scotmany12, sam.samhorn, Kmd4390)
DrippingGoofball: 3 (farside22, zwetschenwasser, CounselWolf)
camn: 1 (Jebus)
farside22: 1 (populartajo)
populartajo: 1 (camn)
Thestatusquo: 1 (DrippingGoofball)

Not Voting: 4 (Simenon, stark, crywolf20084, Caboose)

hasdgfas · Post Post #213 (ISO) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 8:07 am

hey zwet, got any flavor backing for being a martyr/bodyguard?

camn · Post Post #214 (ISO) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 8:31 am

hasdgfas wrote:hey zwet, got any flavor backing for being a martyr/bodyguard?

More than what he already posted?
What are you looking for?

ps

UNVOTE
Vote: Jebus

hasdgfas · Post Post #215 (ISO) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 8:36 am

camn wrote:
hasdgfas wrote:hey zwet, got any flavor backing for being a martyr/bodyguard?
More than what he already posted?
What are you looking for?

what? He hasn't posted

any

flavor besides a name. I want to know why William Wallace is a martyr/bodyguard. What are you trying to say here?

populartajo · Post Post #216 (ISO) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 8:46 am

Unvote Vote Jebus.

populartajo · Post Post #217 (ISO) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 8:47 am

I also dont like farside and recently has. Caboose is meh.

camn · Post Post #218 (ISO) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 8:51 am

hasdgfas wrote:
camn wrote:
hasdgfas wrote:hey zwet, got any flavor backing for being a martyr/bodyguard?
More than what he already posted?
What are you looking for?
what? He hasn't posted
any
flavor besides a name. I want to know why William Wallace is a martyr/bodyguard. What are you trying to say here?

I thought I was pretty clear.
Why do you want more flavor?
Anyone who has seen

Brave Heart

could make up flavor for this... so I don't see the purpose.

qwints · Post Post #219 (ISO) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 8:54 am

unvote

Caboose vouching for zwet combined w/ zwet claiming bodyguard means I don't want to lynch zwet today.

hasdgfas · Post Post #220 (ISO) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 9:17 am

camn wrote:
hasdgfas wrote:
camn wrote:
hasdgfas wrote:hey zwet, got any flavor backing for being a martyr/bodyguard?
More than what he already posted?
What are you looking for?
what? He hasn't posted
any
flavor besides a name. I want to know why William Wallace is a martyr/bodyguard. What are you trying to say here?
I thought I was pretty clear.
Why do you want more flavor?
Anyone who has seen
Brave Heart
could make up flavor for this... so I don't see the purpose.

FoS: camn

Because if he can't come up with flavor, why should we believe him? I don't like at all how you gave him an out here.

scotmany12 · Post Post #221 (ISO) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 9:20 am

We fucking serious people? Seriously, stop unvoting. I do not get what makes this claim so believable; and after reading about William Wallace, I really don't see how martyr (or bodyguard for that matter) fits for him. And we should not be letting him get away with his OMGUS on shea.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #222 (ISO) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 9:21 am

I think asking for flavor is a perfectly fair question. The answer may not be particularly useful, but I doubt it'll help the scum.

scotmany12 · Post Post #223 (ISO) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 9:22 am

Ok, I take back what I said about the rolenname not fitting the role. Still does not mean I believe it. He has lied before, he is lying again.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #224 (ISO) » Sat Feb 14, 2009 9:22 am

scotmany12 wrote:We fucking serious people? Seriously, stop unvoting. I do not get what makes this claim so believable; and after reading about William Wallace, I really don't see how martyr (or bodyguard for that matter) fits for him. And we should not be letting him get away with his OMGUS on shea.

What is believable is that scum will do everything in its power to reduce discussion and ensure the quickest, least informative mislynch possible. Thanks for helping the scum's agenda.