[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 1545025 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null ITT we fawn over pretty girls - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #16 (isolation #2) » Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:49 am
Postby JDodge »
elvis_knits wrote:I'm really trying to be honest about how I saw things go down, not force people to accept my position.
I haven't seen one good explanation for why tajo saying someone is beautiful is somehow bad or wrong. I haven't seen one good explanation for how saying "most of the girls who post in this thread are downright unnatractive" is not an insult.
My point is that Shea has some problem with tajo and others telling a girl she's pretty. While making his point, he said most of the girls in the thread are unattractive. That is a far bigger insult.
Shea was pointing out the creepiness of tajo and others while stating his own opinion as to why their behaviour is creepy. Insult being a byproduct.
You might do well to actually learn the context of something before you go off all insulted and trying to SHOW HOW HIS SIDE OF THE ISSUE IS BAD.
Post
Post #18 (isolation #3) » Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:53 am
Postby JDodge »
elvis_knits wrote:I knew the context, thanks. I fail to see how it's creepy. I've seen people be creepy. That wasn't creepy.
And that is your subjective opinion. Much like how Shea thinking the majority of girls on this site are unattractive is his own subjective opinion. You agree that everyone has their right to an opinion, right?
Post
Post #22 (isolation #4) » Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:56 am
Postby JDodge »
populartajo wrote:THERE WAS NO FUCKING REASON TO GENERALIZE PEOPLE.
He could say : "I said no names" in a coward attempt to avoid responsibility but there was no reason to say people commenting on nice pics of a girl are sexually frustrated and that the majority of the girls of the site are ugly.
Even more, there was no reason to call me virgin nerd that jacks off with alpacas (LOL).´I find these things hilarious but Shea did it with other obvious intentions.
This only to show you the kind of person you are defending regardless of the situation.
You take offense at being called a virgin - yep, you def. are one. You spend a large portion of your time on the internet - that makes you a nerd. So two out of three are true.
Post
Post #26 (isolation #5) » Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:59 am
Postby JDodge »
populartajo wrote:
JDodge wrote:
populartajo wrote:THERE WAS NO FUCKING REASON TO GENERALIZE PEOPLE.
He could say : "I said no names" in a coward attempt to avoid responsibility but there was no reason to say people commenting on nice pics of a girl are sexually frustrated and that the majority of the girls of the site are ugly.
Even more, there was no reason to call me virgin nerd that jacks off with alpacas (LOL).´I find these things hilarious but Shea did it with other obvious intentions.
This only to show you the kind of person you are defending regardless of the situation.
You take offense at being called a virgin - yep, you def. are one. You spend a large portion of your time on the internet - that makes you a nerd. So two out of three are true.
You are being retarded on purpose, right?
There is no reason to take offense at being called a virgin unless you actually are one who is too socially awkward to actually get any.
Post
Post #41 (isolation #6) » Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:31 am
Postby JDodge »
farside22 wrote:
JDodge wrote:
populartajo wrote:
JDodge wrote:
populartajo wrote:THERE WAS NO FUCKING REASON TO GENERALIZE PEOPLE.
He could say : "I said no names" in a coward attempt to avoid responsibility but there was no reason to say people commenting on nice pics of a girl are sexually frustrated and that the majority of the girls of the site are ugly.
Even more, there was no reason to call me virgin nerd that jacks off with alpacas (LOL).´I find these things hilarious but Shea did it with other obvious intentions.
This only to show you the kind of person you are defending regardless of the situation.
You take offense at being called a virgin - yep, you def. are one. You spend a large portion of your time on the internet - that makes you a nerd. So two out of three are true.
You are being retarded on purpose, right?
There is no reason to take offense at being called a virgin unless you actually are one who is too socially awkward to actually get any.
I find JD line of thought on the subject illogical.
If you call someone ugly to there face and they get offended it doesn't mean they are ugly they are most likely offended at the comment.
If someone says something hurtful to be a dick people are going to be offended.
I could go on but I'm sure you will just say that everything people are offened about must be true instead of people having feelings at all.
The issue being that virgin is not necessarily hurtful.
Post
Post #44 (isolation #7) » Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:37 am
Postby JDodge »
elvis_knits wrote:Look, I don't care about that part, but Shea clearly meant virgin as an insult. So why shouldn't tajo take it as one?
He meant virgin in the context of his argument. You really haven't actually read what you're talking about, have you? All you ever seem to see in any debate I've ever seen is your valiant, great and all-powerful side v. the warped, twisted, evil, mean side that you're up against. It's not all black and white. Not every argument is meant as an insult.