California Trilogy: City of Angels - On Camera (Game Over)

PJ. · Post Post #28 (isolation #0) » Fri Aug 21, 2009 4:17 pm

The "Locke" that I know would never be this selfless and willingly give up power unless it's not power at all and will be somewhat costly to our current situation or my life.

With that being said I must say that I feel more comfortable risking my own life then the lives of all of us, which would be what I was doing by allowing "Locke" to drive.

PJ. · Post Post #29 (isolation #1) » Fri Aug 21, 2009 4:18 pm

Vote: Valentine Drives

Tags removed. Read the rules. - Mod

PJ. · Post Post #33 (isolation #2) » Fri Aug 21, 2009 10:32 pm

This is why I was intially weary. Kinda proves my point.

If he drives he controls where we go. If I drive I control where we go. "Locke" is the type of person who wouldn't give this choice up unless the driver didn't really have power.

So either "Locke" is trying to persuade me to drive so I lose my own life or he is using the fear of losing my life so HE can drive and take us where he pleases.

If this is the case, I'd rather drive then let him drive.

Quotes removed. Read the Rules. - Mod

PJ. · Post Post #55 (isolation #3) » Sun Aug 23, 2009 9:13 am

Adressing Carrie

My recommendation would be that I should drive, for I was meant to lead. I didn't receive any information about "Locke" or what would happen if he would drive. I was concerned because he so willingly want me to drive.

PJ. · Post Post #69 (isolation #4) » Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:00 pm

First addressing Locke

I wasn't given any information other than I should be the one to drive.

Walks to Julie to address her

If we are to believe "Locke", The advantages are that Locke remains an innocent.

If we don't believe Locke, I'm the only one in danger for I'm driving. My intentions are pure and I was meant to lead.

The disadvantages if "Locke" has lied, we will probably lose one of our numbers, me.

The disadvantages if "Locke", is honest are nil.

PJ. · Post Post #82 (isolation #5) » Wed Aug 26, 2009 4:04 pm

First at Julie

I wasn't given as much info as locke because I didn't have a choice to make. My alignment will not change regardless of whether I drive or not. I was simply meant to lead.

Then addressing Huey lewis

I don't think I have been doing any avoiding. Also, I have been stating that I found it odd that "Locke" wants me to drive as well.

PJ. · Post Post #89 (isolation #6) » Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:26 pm

Than Vote so we can be done with it.

It's not that we are withholding information it's that there isn't much information to be had.

PJ. · Post Post #116 (isolation #7) » Sun Aug 30, 2009 3:29 pm

I have noticed that many of you are referring to me as a he, this is faulty. I am very female.

I was not given any info other than that I am meant to lead us to Los Angeles

PJ. · Post Post #138 (isolation #8) » Tue Sep 01, 2009 8:47 pm

nods as she listens to what Green is saying

I understand how you feel and why you feel that way, but I think the one thing you fail to take into account is that I could have not, and did not, received as much information as Locke. This why I have chosen to stay quiet because I believe in what I was told and I believe that Locke is telling the truth. If he isn't, than it was truly brilliant play to get what he wanted, but that doesn't help the rest of us and I KNOW that the only person put in jeopardy when I drive is myself.

PJ. · Post Post #155 (isolation #9) » Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:34 pm

Mrs. Newmar, What I said is that I know that I am the one that is supposed to. I feel Mrs.Fisher is one of the people that Locke has been mentioning that would be unhappy with him if he didn't drive. I believe this reaffirms Locke's information and mine. I am the one who is meant to drive.