Mafia 37: Werewolves - Game over!

CoolBot · Post Post #51 (isolation #0) » Thu May 12, 2005 4:09 am

I'm not too sure we can say there are experienced players just because IS was killed. I think just about all of them know that Locus always attacks IS day 1, and it usually becomes the prime discussion of the day. I know I've done that when mafia. This certainly doesn't clear them, though, due to double think and the like.

Dranko20 wrote:Anyways, I'm gonna Vote: mneme.

Not really a good reason, but he said that there was potentionally experienced members in the mafia right? Well, that includes you, don't it?

It's not much, but worth a vote to me.

You're right that's not much. It's nothing. Just why does bringing this up make her suspicous? I think you're trying to manufacture a wagon here.

vote: Dranko20

CoolBot · Post Post #61 (isolation #1) » Thu May 12, 2005 2:53 pm

mneme wrote:Coolbot: what do I have to put in as a userpic before people realize I'm a guy?

Well, I

usually

get it right.

I don't really think we should push pooky too hard on why he came out. He may be a searching mason, or activating a power. No need for that to be out in the open.

CoolBot · Post Post #67 (isolation #2) » Fri May 13, 2005 2:51 am

Coron, you said mneme acted as if he had extra info when he did nothing of the sort.

CoolBot · Post Post #82 (isolation #3) » Sat May 14, 2005 2:44 am

unvote: Dranko20
vote: FD2

No lynch is never a good idea day one, and should be discouraged.

CoolBot · Post Post #91 (isolation #4) » Sat May 14, 2005 5:35 pm

The way the town wins is by lynching. There is no alternative. Without a good reason not to, we lynch.

Why is FD2 being inexperienced an excuse? It's a mistake that indicates an unwillingness to risk a lynch. Since the only ones that can win without lynches is anti-town, it's a mistake the indicates scum.

CoolBot · Post Post #104 (isolation #5) » Mon May 16, 2005 3:08 am

No lynch is one of the worst things the town can do Day 1. No lynches benefit scum because they cannot die, except by vig or rival scum. Once I hear from FD2, I'll rethink my vote, but for now it stands.

CoolBot · Post Post #123 (isolation #6) » Tue May 17, 2005 12:07 pm

unvote: NanooktheWolf

since he's not backing a no lynch anymore.

vote: Dranko20

for the same reason I was voting him earlier.

CoolBot · Post Post #140 (isolation #7) » Wed May 18, 2005 4:15 pm

Why shouldn't I switch my vote back? You've done nothing to acquit yourself. I certainly didn't unvote you because you somehow became unsuspicous.

CoolBot · Post Post #183 (isolation #8) » Fri May 20, 2005 2:53 am

unvote: Dranko20
vote: Esme

I'm not too sure about Dranko's claim, but we have plenty of time for him to make a mistake.

Esme, why go after the non voters? Is there some reason mafia are more likely not to vote than town? It seems pretty much the opposite, since they are trying to direct the lynch away from them.

CoolBot · Post Post #207 (isolation #9) » Sun May 22, 2005 1:20 pm

Esme wanted us to limit our bandwagons to non-voters. There's no reason why non-voters would preferentially be mafia, so this was crap logic probably designed to keep us from bandwagoning mafia.

CoolBot · Post Post #244 (isolation #10) » Thu May 26, 2005 7:12 am

I want her to claim. I can't see anything changing my mind on the count. We should probably concentrate on brushhpper next, though.

CoolBot · Post Post #288 (isolation #11) » Tue May 31, 2005 3:41 am

Why the confusion about esme's bandwagon? She continually tried to move the towns attention to non-voters without really explaining why scum would likely not be voters. She jumps from bandwagon to bandwagon while still advocating votes for non-voters.

Mod

, we have a few lurkers; could we get prods?

CoolBot · Post Post #306 (isolation #12) » Wed Jun 01, 2005 2:38 am

I take it villiager is just a vanilla townie?

CoolBot · Post Post #320 (isolation #13) » Wed Jun 01, 2005 6:37 am

I don't like Brushhoopper's claim. As been said, there was no need for it. I wouldn't be surprised if Brushhopper is making an aliby by confirming esme.

unvote: esme
vote: brushhopper

If need be, I will switch to esme before the deadline, as her claim doesn't really explain her actions.

CoolBot · Post Post #359 (isolation #14) » Thu Jun 09, 2005 8:44 am

I'd like to hear from Dranko, too. Though I can't help but think esme's quick vote on Dranko is preemptive attempt to keep the town from turning its attention to her.

CoolBot · Post Post #383 (isolation #15) » Sun Jun 12, 2005 10:16 am

I don't think PB is acting scummy. Yeah, the shouting is annoying, but nothing he's done indicates scum.

I still don't like esme's attempt to focus on nonvoters, and I do believe she was looking for an easy bandwagon on Dranko

vote: Esme

CoolBot · Post Post #399 (isolation #16) » Tue Jun 14, 2005 5:06 am

So esme,

we're

supposed to come up for the justification for

your

vote? That doesn't seem like a good way of doing hings. I'd rather hear your justification and then evaluate it.

CoolBot · Post Post #415 (isolation #17) » Wed Jun 15, 2005 5:03 am

I don't know about anyone else, but I intend to lynch esme. This isn't an info wagon.

CoolBot · Post Post #440 (isolation #18) » Sun Jun 19, 2005 5:25 pm

Dranko said he'd investigate me Day 1. The first thing he said after daybreak was I was innocnet. Why is this a problem now?

CoolBot · Post Post #449 (isolation #19) » Mon Jun 20, 2005 7:43 am

mikehart wrote:because it gives you a rather large bullseye on your back. as you should know coolbot, scum loves to kill confirmed townies. its better to kill a confirmed townie than an unconfirmed anything and their target turn out to be evil.

I understand that, but Dranko already said I was innocent. Why make a big deal of it now? And there certainly is an arguement that once a cop is in the open, he should make his info known before scum targets him.