[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 1984862 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Newbie 873 - Game Over. - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #29 (isolation #4) » Mon Nov 30, 2009 12:38 pm
Postby McGriddle »
Accusation on CSL, I understand he is trying to help us, but it makes it seem like he is trying to persuade us to appreciate his knowledge on the subject.
Accusation on Foilist, same, only a little bit more suspicious to me. I enjoy the quick vote. It's a good way to get some responses.
Post
Post #42 (isolation #6) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:23 am
Postby McGriddle »
Well, easy explanation for this. When you are friends with people on this game you are less likely to lynch and more likely to find excuses as to why not we should lynch. All I said was I am suspicious. I did not vote CSL, I am just watching him. I unvoted foilist with the hopes that the voting would slow down and we can have discussions over time that will result in a vote, rather than a first post. I admit I probably shouldn't have voted so soon, but I unvoted to get a fresh start at this and to give everyone a chance. My focus is slightly lifted off of CSL and foilist. I honestly don't have any ideas as to who could be scum.
As for Crimmys vote, I don't believe for 1 second that it was a Random Vote, but I don't know if I can recognize that as a scummy thing to do, or a newbie way to get someone lynched to narrow down possibilities.
Post
Post #54 (isolation #8) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:33 pm
Postby McGriddle »
dimaba wrote:Well you could at the very least explain who you were referring to with that remark about friends being less likely to lynch eachother...
At a stretch I could accept that you're not able to explain any further, but it's a very simple question I asked and you didn't answer it. It's very possible that it's my fault that I don't get it, but would it hurt you to help me figure it out?
vote: McGriddle
for the reasons I gave in post 41 and for being uncooperative
Pay attention. I said he is trying to appeal to everyone, meaning make some virtual friends. Not saying I don't LIKE the guy, just saying if I did like the guy I would be less likely to vote him.
Post
Post #58 (isolation #10) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 3:24 pm
Postby McGriddle »
dimaba wrote:
McGriddle wrote:
Pay attention. I said he is trying to appeal to everyone, meaning make some virtual friends. Not saying I don't LIKE the guy, just saying if I did like the guy I would be less likely to vote him.
Right, now you're finally making some sort of sense. Would've been nice if you'd answered the question first time around... Now I finally get the connection between your opinion on CSL and the post where you explained your reasons. Thanks for clarifying that for me and yes you were right. It was my fault that I didn't make the connection. In the future, maybe you could use quotes to make it more obvious what you're responding to so even morons like me can see the connection instantly.
As for your theory... Well I find it rather obvious that he'd try to make us his virtual friends. I think most of us want the others to be our friends, since none of us want to be lynched. That's why most of us try to cooperate as much as possible (unlike you), answer any questions about our reasoning (unlike you) and try not to rub people the wrong way (also unlike you, if you ask me, but that's just bad manners and not a reason to vote for you).
The vote stays in place. Your reasoning is still unsound, you're not being cooperative when asked to explain your actions and you seem to be bullying us into not voting for you ("You are making a mistake") rather than convincing us of your innocence.
Right. All is forgiven. And I apologize for not quoting. I don't have a vote, so my actions aren't done in a manner to get anyone lynched. I was being cooperative, just not smart lol. I did answer questions to the best of my ability. I might have rubbed people the wrong way. But I apologize.
Post
Post #62 (isolation #12) » Wed Dec 02, 2009 2:55 am
Postby McGriddle »
Jackabomb wrote:Awww...my cades drive isn't getting any attention? I'm still not happy with either mcgrill OR crimmy's excuses for thier bandwagon of foilist.
\
I slightly see your point. Although I can't see a vote yet. It's still pretty early.
Post
Post #69 (isolation #13) » Wed Dec 02, 2009 10:19 am
Postby McGriddle »
Vote Crimmy
For sounding very suspicious to me, and after realizing how suspicious became inactive. Seems scummy to me. Personal opinion. Sorry Crimmy, but in this game you can't trust anyone.
Post
Post #83 (isolation #15) » Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:22 pm
Postby McGriddle »
Crimmy wrote:
McGriddle wrote:
Vote Crimmy
For sounding very suspicious to me, and after realizing how suspicious
became inactive.
Seems scummy to me. Personal opinion. Sorry Crimmy, but in this game you can't trust anyone.
Oh sure.
I can't have personal life, because I'm always in front of a PC.
I can't have my life because I need to be here so I'm not suspicious, is that it?
Well, have it your way. I'm sure this is THE most scummy thing I've seen so far. I mean, you only say "sounding suspicious", and then you say you'll get me for "absence". I went away, what, 7 hours? Maybe you don't eat, or do homework, but life happens.
So, basically, you vote for one person because they "sound suspicious" without giving the specific quote where it sounded suspicious; not to mention people who go out to eat, instead of sitting in front of a PC are scummies.
People, go figure. I'll just raise a Finger of Suspicion on McGriddle.
IGMEOY McGriddle.
Lol everything you have done sounds scummy. I'm not trying to offend you I promise. I just had a feeling you were scum because you were so active and then when the focus was taken off of you, you seemed to just lay low. I'm sorry mate, just a personal opinion. No need to get offended.
Post
Post #88 (isolation #16) » Thu Dec 03, 2009 3:46 am
Postby McGriddle »
Lol everyone who says I am riding bandwagons, I am a newb, my tells usually aren't as good as anyone elses, so obviously if someone puts up a tell and it sounds like a good tell I am going to lean towards that person.
Post
Post #91 (isolation #17) » Thu Dec 03, 2009 1:59 pm
Postby McGriddle »
cades wrote:
McGriddle wrote:
Unvote: Vote Cades
Obvious reason. Post number 76.
I haven't defended Cades at all. So if you think I am on his team you are sadly mistaken. I even threw him in front of the bus on accident lol.
so you vote me because they said that we were a team, would you vote them
anyway, I didn't realize I tried to make everyone feel sad for me, but I guess I did, and of course that is scummy, as everything is even this emoticon
anyway, sadly I was killed during the night in my other game, as I was a townie, but I probably will die here during the day as a townie.
the worst part is, I might live, but then Jack will be killed during the night, so everyone will think it was me, but of course how could jack kill himself?
Unvote: Vote McGriddle
you voted me for no reason, I'm not voting you because you vote me, but because you voted me for a dumb reason.
No I meant I was suspicious of you Cades. Now I am almost positive you are scum. You make that obvious scum post, then put me in L-2 (was almost L-1) and after all of that you attack me individually because right now I am the most suspicious and hurting player. (My fault, again, I am a newb and I am still getting the hang of this and trying to find the right way to get through this game alive lol) But back to what I was saying it is obvious that are scum to me because I DID vote you for a better reason than you are voting me. Also for putting me in L-2 because of a personal voting opinion where as yours was via a previous post that is scummy to me.
Post
Post #97 (isolation #18) » Thu Dec 03, 2009 4:34 pm
Postby McGriddle »
Uhm I had 3 people and almost 4. And to answer your question, He made an obvious "oh look at me! I am being sarcastic about being a scum" post. That's a dead give to me. My opinion is that it was obvious.
Post
Post #104 (isolation #20) » Fri Dec 04, 2009 7:32 am
Postby McGriddle »
Crimmy wrote:McGriddle, it seems you have forgotten you simply jump at bandwagons "without" an apparent reason, and when you start bandwagons, you don't give reasons, just "gut feelings" as one could call them.
As such, it could be that you're simply thinking of bumping people off without any reason, other than the fact that they either are inactive, or because they "sound suspicious".
In this game, it's almost hard evidence, or nothing. You seem to give nothing, and as such that's why you have jumped to the top of the scummy list for me as well.
Lol I'm not trying to persuade anybody, nor am I band wagoning. I thought the post was scummy, and I even said that, I can't explain it to you people if you're just going to accuse me of bandwagon riding every vote I give.
Post
Post #107 (isolation #21) » Fri Dec 04, 2009 8:17 am
Postby McGriddle »
Lol way to read it out of context. It was meant as in if you can't understand why I vote someone after I explain it then it's your problem, and then you accuse me of riding a bandwagon because of it.
Post
Post #117 (isolation #22) » Fri Dec 04, 2009 1:35 pm
Postby McGriddle »
I am sorry if my posts sound mean or scummy, like I have said, I am new to this game (VERY new) and I am still learning how to get tells from people without sounding scummy, doing pretty bad, but my point is, I really don't know how to explain myself without sounding scummy. I have read tutorials and everything but I still have no idea. But if there is one thing I am trying to tell you is that I am working very hard at being pro-town, and I never meant to be a jerk.