Scandalous! Following that logic, and since he won't be around to defend himself...HackerHuck wrote:Vote: xvartHe was scum in the last game we played together and I can't see why he wouldn't be scum again.
Just a warning, but I had to do some unplanned travel for business so I may not be very active this week.
I think it is a little premature to decide about someone's general dedication to bandwagons, don't you think? Is the set of one bandwagon (especially one during "RVS") a good representation of all bandwagons? I think not. I think this "additional" justification for the vote is ridiculous.Nachomamma8, 21 wrote:In addition to Ectomancer's reasons, I am voting you because you seem afraid to remain with a bandwagon very long.
This is a good question, especially considering the response.Nachomamma8, 28 wrote:@raider: Why are you trying to extend the RVS when it's obviously already ended? What is your opinion on what's happened so far?
raider8169, 37 wrote:Why not? There is no official ending for the RVS so I thought it would be fun to change my vote a few times. Besides, if the RVS has officially ended wouldnt all the votes casted during the RVS be removed?
You thought the conversation was stupid, yet it was good because it was conversation; but you did not want to participate? You felt the best move was to just ignore the good, stupid conversation and let everyone else participate while you switched your "vote a few times"?raider8169, 37 wrote:I thought what was going on was stupid but I wasnt about to say something as it was sparking conversation which is always good. I saw the third vote as a null tell as well as the unvote.
1. completed two games so far on this site and in a couple others. Played a handful of games at another forum where there was less concern with balance, etc. and a strict 2d day/1d night.kikuchiyo wrote:1. What is your experience level?
2. Do you prefer scum roles or town roles?
3. Favorite color.
4. How many players in this lineup have you played with before?
I also apologize for my comment. I never said I endorsed any implication in it and I read it as a joke. I really thought it was a funny thing to say regarding asking a series of questions during the "alleged" RVS "phase." Of course, since I've played a game with kikuchiyo before I might have a little more experience discerning that. But I agree, let's all be friends... at least until someone turns up scum.Nachomamma8 wrote:And I also think that kiikuchiyo's comment + xvart's reaction to it was a bit immature; after all, this is still a game, and you don't have to call people assholes in order to play it properly.
So you have since decided that being totally unhelpful is the better strategy?5cvm wrote:Sometimes I think people on this website get so caught up in being belligerent and accusatory that what they're actually talking about goes right out the window. In my first game here, I got really caught up in a entirely useless and unneccesary argument with one of those people, so needless to say I decided I'd never letthathappen again.
Who accepted your soft "role claim" and what did they accept about it?5cvm wrote:Ok, while I admit that my "gambit" (which hardly deserves the title) was anything but inpenetrable, several people accepted it, and in the process of making it I made a second post with much more convincing wording.
I'm not familiar with what you are suggesting. I'm somewhat familiar with 5cvm.Unity wrote:ok. I understand what you're saying but not why he would do such a thing. Is that a common role element in these alternate games? You seem very familiar with it.xvart wrote:No. He's implying that he is scum and the role information is his scum buddies.
xvart.
I'm bothered by it, too. As I noted, I'm especially bothered by the fact that he said he had inside knowledge saying Nachomama was scum and now Nachomama is a solid town read.HackerHuck wrote:This is close to what I was thinking. 5cvm's information claim did not at all seem genuine, so I didn't even take it at face value when I voted. It became scummier to me when he confirmed that he was really trying to imply that he had inside knowledge of Nacho's alignment, but was doing it as a gambit.
I'm really surprised that no one else is bothered by it.
I would love to hear those responses, too.Green Crayons wrote:·Would love to have 5cvm response to 105 and 110. I'm also curious as to what extensive professed insight as to players' alignment 5cvm has apparently gleaned. Something other than names would be nice (hint: explanations!).
lol. I truly hope that isn't true.5cvm wrote:Xvart, I don't believe you and I will ever get along. <3
5cvm wrote:"It's not you, it's me."
In all honesty, and without speaking about ongoing games too much, I like you just fine in this game. Your first post, right out of the bat, seemed like exactly the same thing from the other game, only a little more passive aggressive about self claiming scum. I now realize that was my mistake and I shouldn't have jumped so high so fast. However, I still think you are scum5cvm wrote:You should be happy I got off of it pretty quickly, compared to our other game.
I look forward to reading your role when the time comes.5cvm wrote:Although, if it ever comes time for me to claim, you will see that my randomgambitclaim was inspired by my real role.
Dang. I hope you get better soon.Ectomancer wrote:I'm not getting over this, coughing up blood this morning so I'm headed back to the doctor.
Welcome, wolframnhart. Happy hunting.Budja wrote:wolframnhart replaces Ectomancer
Is the scumtell you are talking about the not knowing the votecount or misrepresenting the votecount?Nachomamma8 wrote:I know a scumtell when I see one, despite whose name is to the left of it.but for that "scumtell", I don't think you can really say that. you've never played with me before.
Especially when they both may very well be scum. My vote tomorrow is heavily leaning towards MrSuave tomorrow unless he posts something incredible. I believe we have legitimate cases on both 5cvm and MrSuave.kikuchiyo wrote:Competing wagons are good for town.
I would be willing to switch votes from 5cvm to MrSuave based on this post alone.MrSuave wrote:Happy new years everyone!
So you think there is only one scum in this game? The odds of randomly hitting a scum member is probably around 25% - 33% (if there are three or four scum respectively).Gerhard Krause wrote:Also I don't have my probabilities wrong. If you want me to discount myself, that's reasonable. 1/11 of hitting scum. Happy?
I definitely think 5cvm is scummy. I'm fencesitting on MrSuave, and switched my vote based on his responses to the increased pressure. I was hoping some increased pressure (up to L-2) would get some answers, content, responses, etc. and would be satisfied returning my vote to 5cvm but with the lackluster response by MrSuave I can't tell if he is just a townie who doesn't know what to do to get out of his current predicament or a resigned scum member.peanutman wrote:@xvart, am I correct in thinking you don't feel that Mr Suave or 5cvm are scummy, but rather badly playing townies?
I'm going to keep my vote where it is for now, but I would switch to 5cvm or even raider when the deadline approaches and their responses. I think I was the first one all over raider and my pursuit of him went nowhere; but since others are chiming in now I would be happy to go back and put some more pressure on him. My top clear scum reads are 5cvm and raider.peanutman wrote:If so, who does strike you as scummy currently?
I initially did not like his "happy New Year" post, especially when he had not commented on the vote on him, nor provided any discussion. He did not mention anything of the sort about posting later. It appeared to be an obvious posting as not to get prodded or possibly active lurking. Then, when another vote (or couple votes, can't remember) were placed on him the only thing he said was "le gasp." So I put my vote on him to put him at L-2, which I was comfortable doing to see if that would make him take the votes more seriously. As I've said, I'm not sure if he is resigned scum now that he has so many votes or just a townie who doesn't know how to get out of the place he is in.Gerhard Krause wrote:@Xvart - What did you find scummy about MrSuave in the first place?