Mini 228 - Smash Brothers - GAME OVER

[TBuG]

Ha! Second post.

Vote: inHimshallibe

for beating me to the first post.

[TBuG]

You're just jealous .

Wh do you think I voted for you?

[TBuG]

Average fos on armlx and indentured

Like Bacde said, that seem's kinda weird...

[TBuG]

I don't know who to vote for. I don't buy Jigglypuff as a townie, but I don't really know what the mod would do.

[TBuG]

Fine then,

Unvote; vote: id

Mod edit: Fixed the tags

[TBuG]

I'm sorry that I haven't been around, I've got high school to deal with...

I have my suspicions too, but as Someone said, not enough to vote.

[TBuG]

Vote: Chaos

FoS: inHim

How's that for content? I meant as in my suspicions are the same, not I have suspicions but I'm not telling.

[TBuG]

Finw then. I'm Kirby. I'm a role-copier. I may choose any one person to copy their role and also find out who they are, and last night I chose Bacde to copy. Bacde is telling the truth about his role (Mr. Game and Watch) and his ability. I was immune to all night kills as the random choice.

How's that for a claim?

[TBuG]

Just wondering PBuG, since you already know my role anyway. What happens If I roll a six. Lets say that tommorow night I happened to role a 6, what ability would I gain?

You get an investigation.

I claimed because I thought I had three votes, which put me two away, but I misread Bacde's post.

[TBuG]

Oh, sorry, didn't read the whole line.

6 - You may investigate the player of your choice this night, and the mod will tell you that player’s role name.

[TBuG]

Done.

Imo there's two ways to go from here. We either go bandwagon somebody else that looks suspicious and hope we don't hit the doc, or lynch the most suspicious looking claim.

If we're looking to lynch a claimant than I motion it to be chaos. I'm not throughly convinced of his innocence and his claim is not rock-solid. However, it is a power role.

I'm throughly against a mass claim, as imo we have a doc left (unless anyone wants to try to convince me otherwise.)

As for unclaimed targets...you'll have to wait for me to do another re-read for that info.

Obviously, the choice would be Chaos, he's the only claimed player that is unconfirmed. You're just a regular genius, aren't you?

[TBuG]

Eh. He can be confirme hough. Just have him block PBuG tonight (maybe Bacde, but I don't know if that would actually block him.)

Have him block me, who's practically confirmed? Funny. My ability is useful because I can find out someones exact role. I don't think that should be blocked.

[TBuG]

Yes, for that night.

[TBuG]

I agree with armlx except I think Chaos is scummier than SO, and I think inHim is scummier than both.

Unvote, Vote: Someone

[TBuG]

Unvote; vote: rajr

Yup.

[TBuG]

Unvote: rajr

I feel safer with

Vote: inHim

right now.

[TBuG]

Unvote: rajr

I feel safer with

Vote: inHim

right now.

oops.

Unvote: rajr, Vote inHim

[TBuG]

I also think I know what their roles are.

I'm entirely willing to keep my vote on inHim. The only reason why I believe Blackberry is because in the very second post, mod said that having a scummy cop Capt. Falcon was just as likely as a good roleblocker Capt. Falcon, and not to think that knowing the roles will make the abilities obvious. The only obvious ones so far are mine and SO's.

[TBuG]

Unvote; vote Iammars

Okay, think. Scum can't kill you both in one night. We don't seem to have an SK. And even if we did, they'd probably target the same person.

[TBuG]

Says someone who pays attention to the Day 2 opening post.

[TBuG]

Go ahead and claim, it could be really helpful.

[TBuG]

Blackberry, is it one-shot? Not that it matters too much, but I'm curious.

In case I'm not voting for inHim already,

Unvote; vote: inHim

I know it's a far cry, but hear me out: it's ossible we DO have two vigilantes. One is one-shot and the other is every three nights at least, so that means we'd probably have at most 4 vig kills in the game, which adds up to less than a full vig. Sorry if my logic is crappy, my vote stays on inHim anyway, and I'm probably going to copy SO tonight. If he is a vig, I won't use the kill, even if I can, which I probably wouldn't be able to. That is, unless you guys want me to use the kill.

[TBuG]

Chaos, it does no good to roleblock me. I've used up my only shot.

How about: Chaos blocks PBuG, and PBuG copies me. If Chaos is indeed a roleblocker, then PBuG logically won't be able to copy me. If PBuG does copy me, then it's obvious Chaos is lying, and then he can use my one vig shot to take out Chaos. The only thing I don't like about this plan is that I'm not certain whether or not PBuG would get a vig shot. PBuG - do you copy roles as they are now, or as they started out? Or is your role description not so explicit?

Or we could see if I am an actual roleblocker by having PBug target me.

My way: We get to block

2

unconfirmed townies and confirm me.
Your way: Confirms me or kills me. But we get

0

roleblocks.

My way is infinitely better unless you present a better argument.

Also, why are you so against being blocked anyways? *raises eyebrow*

Won't copy:
Bacde (because I've already proven him)
rajr/Iammars (because I believe them and I don't see the point in copying a Mason)
armlx (because I believe him)
Chaos (because I believe him)

Might copy:
SO (to prove him)
inHim (to prove him and possibly to kill believed scum)
Blackberry (to prove a very obscure role)

Unvote, Vote: inHim

[TBuG]

Copying a claimed vig won't clear them.

Yes it will because I'll get their role info.

[TBuG]

Okay, listen to this. We think that scum being on the bandwagon is probable, if not certain. Why don't we lynch inHim, and if he's town or (unlikely) SK, lynch armlx. If they're both town, we should go back and evaluate the people who voted for him.

Seems awful scuumy of me, but I thought I'd just put the idea forward.

[TBuG]

I was looking back at D1 and SO was voting for indentureddjinn, but switched to Bacde when a lot of epople were, and didn't have the chance to switch back. Just stating something that may be helpful.

[TBuG]

SO

is

a close second for me, but only because of lurking & the two-vig thing.

[TBuG]

But we'll have SO for future use if we strongly think that someone other than him is scum, but lynch someone scummier. I think your plan is good, or at least the best we can hope for.

[TBuG]

Okay, I can tell I'm not gonna get my way so

Unvote, vote: SO

[TBuG]

Okay, I can tell I'm not gonna get my way so

Unvote, vote: SO

Remeber, if you copy me, you can roleblock one of either armlx or blackberry. I'm gonna get InHim tonight.

@Blackberry: Don't use your ability tonight.

I'm planning on copying armlx then copying you, if possible, to roleblock Blackberry, although my plans may change.

[TBuG]

Okiedokie... I copied armlx and got my role back. I then copied inHim (sorry, I just was really curious) and got that he was Ness, and that he didn't have a night ablilty. it could be because he already used his role, it could be because he's the SK. it's up in the air right now. My role DID say there are some roles I cannot copy.

Vote: Blackberry

I cleared the other two most suspicious people in the game with one shot. Impressive, huh?

[TBuG]

Yes, I could easily be scum.

[TBuG]

Agreed...

[TBuG]

Vote: Raj

I win.

[TBuG]

P.S. I copied Bacde and was lucky enough to get the double vote.

[TBuG]

Oh, and killing raj kills Iammars, and my night kill leaves it at the endgame.

I win

[TBuG]

I was hoping so much that Bacde didn't get it. I knew armlx would use his reflector thingy, and I'd die...

[TBuG]

Oops. Did you say it was one-shot?