Mini 967 - Mafia War (Over)
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
If you call acting overdefensive to a vote (such as calling the voter an angry child) or trying to minimize a serious vote by saying its because the voter doesn't like cupcakes, or an inability to contribute constructively despite getting not a small number of votes. "nothing" . Then I'd ask you to look up the definition of nothing so you'll stop being suspicious of me.pman5595 wrote:
I agree in principle, but this case does not apply. It wasn't a "small tell", it wasn't a tell at all. I was commenting on how I didn't like the way Empking was making something out of nothing.deadjoker wrote:There is no such thing as "benign" this early in the game, considering there is a lack of information thus far and even very small tells are worth pursuing.Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
1. Katsuki, you called a player a "child". Y/N
You said that to a player who voted you. Y/N
You said that in response to the post where he voted you. Y/N
A child's vote has less meaning than an adult's (When thinking of following.) Y/N
That voter never gave any reason to beleive he was a child. Y/N
Your post wasn't serious. Y/N
When somebody voted you, you called them a child in response to that vote. (AKA you were overdefensive). Y/N
2. Where is the word "All" in this sentance.
You called a serious vote a vote based on not liking cupcakes. Y/N
Trying to minimize a serious vote by saying its because the voter doesn't like cupcakes
This is calling it a random vote. Y/N
A random vote has less worth than a serious vote. Y/N
You were trying to reduce the worth of a serious vote. Y/N
3. Are you saying that saying I'm reacting to "cuddly bears and cupcakes" rather than my serious reasons, is not a comment related to my vote?Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
Katsuki: Now that Soundwish has posted. Can you finally admit that you're trying to make serious votes look like baseless random votes?
Katsuki: Are votes a reaction to things?
Katsuki: Please explain what your reactions to random votes has to do with my case?
Katsuki: Have you made any posts that you're not going to brush off as "sarcasm".
Katsuki: You called Soundwish's vote an overreaction but haven't given any reasons to support that. Y/N.Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
I hadn't mentioned the contribute constructively because before that post I wasn't certain if it was noteworthy.
How is "an inability to contribute constructively despite getting not a small number of votes." vague?Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
Ah. I thought it was clear that there was no contribution. I guess it wasn't crystal clear.pman5595 wrote:
It's just saying that he is not contributing enough, which is vague because there is no specific amount that constitutes bad contribution.Empking wrote:How is "an inability to contribute constructively despite getting not a small number of votes." vague?Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
Its a group tell though. If you don't know someone's alignment you shouldn't link with them, plus if somebody's of unknown alignment you'll want to know how they'll react.Amish_Charney wrote:I'm with pman, I once believed Katsuki's defense to be weak, I take no issue with his more recent posts and responses to the cross examination by Empking. And defense of someone looking down the barrel of charges that could be interpreted as silly isn't a scumtell either.Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
What reasons are based on WIFOM?Katsuki wrote:Vote Empking
Reasons given for AC vote are totally based on WIFOM. Either AC is indeed scum, or mafia NK'ed unsight to frame AC. Convenient way for mafia to frame a scummy-looking AC, and seems more like the later of the two possibilities I stated.
My vote has absolutely nothing to do with the death?
Are you trying to misrepresent my vote?Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
Any reasons for me being the one your voting?horrordude0215 wrote:Vote: Empking
Even though he knew it was required to be a majority lynch, he didn't hammer the Me= case, despite the fact that there was really no way any other lynch would happen.Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
I don't think there's anything wrong really with going "all right, but what else have you got?" scummy as long as you don't use that to discredit what the person has which Exemption isn't doing.Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
AC is still miles ahead in the scummy stakes but he hasn't voted for ages.Exemption wrote:Hey empking just been looking through all your last posts and the last few don't include much more than just commenting on things and repeating questions. I know it's exam time (i'm having trouble finding time to post too) but your levels of lurking are really starting to make me wonder if you doing it on purpose?
FOS: empking-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
I'd be fine with starting at AC. Soundwish not so much.Hrezs wrote:
While I disagree with lynching me, I see no downside of lynching AC who everyone has a general feeling that he is scum. The same applies to soundwishdeadjoker wrote:Question to all players: Do you think we should start a lynch all lurkers campaign? I see three: AC, Soundwish, and Hrezs.-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
I disagree with you that I randomly did anything.horrordude0215 wrote:Vote: Empking
You just randomly sheep off of what FakeGod said without any real contributions of your own? Why?Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
DJ, makes a snide comment against one of the (or the only (I'm not sure)) without giving any weight to it, suggesting that its just a scum-like way of defending himself, without actually addressing FG's analysis. (the attack on FG suggests that the comment about me was not just a coincidence.)Hrezs wrote:
Do you have anything to add to the argument, at all?Empking wrote:
I disagree with you that I randomly did anything.horrordude0215 wrote:Vote: Empking
You just randomly sheep off of what FakeGod said without any real contributions of your own? Why?Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
I don't think the problem is he didn't understand you. Its just that he's pick at straws.FakeGod wrote:ah, I see there has been a misunderstanding.
I meant that "do you disagree with my analysis?", and "do you agree that there are no scum among the three?"
Hopefully that helps clarify things.
Everybody. Secondary suspect?Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
No Result. As in Results were not their. It wasn't a the-target-didn't-act but more roleblock-esque.
b) I waited because of my last nights result. Day 1 I investigated Stef (Town obv) I watched somebody day 2 but I'd like to hold off claiming that until you claim.
c) I'm leaning no. Rolename is Townie Detective.Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.