for trying to bring us out of RVS brfore I got my randomvote
Budja, explain
Aurorus , I see no buddying up, just him saying something random in RVS
Yah-huh! You were at the top of the page, no one was above you.Adrien C wrote:LIES!!!Xite91 wrote:A-hah! there is in fact no post above o\you!
because of that falicy i will vote you with an obvious non OMGUS vote now!
Unvote, Vote:Adrien C
Uhm, I use sarcasm wherever I go, especially this game, I don't see how that's a scumtellCol.Cathart wrote:All I know, is that your inital reaction looked pretty much like a sarcasm (the 'Fantastic' part), and I learned already that sarcasm is one of the most common reactions when trying to hide uneasy feelings or outright lie your way out of situation (to avoid stupid misinterpretations: I'm talking about the former one right now). So far it's the only thing that looks even remotely interesting (in 'maybe he's a scum' way), so my vote stays for now.
Uhm, how was that really a back and forth? Besides, that was still RVS and I have high hopes for good content from him when we all decide to stop fooling around (except for me though, because I never stop foolin around, I'll just do it in a more scumhunting way when I deem fit)d3x wrote:First question - Not really as long as it's not setup spec (for the most part) or stupid stuff that isn't scumhunting at all. In that case I still call it RVS. But I wanted a reason to vote him, and it was RVSAV wrote:Xite22/23- Do you believe taking us out of the RVS early is a bad thing? How long would you like an RVS go on? Do you buy the 3rd Vote ScumTell?Why?Xite wrote:the 3rd{Vote}in a game this size should not be a crap reason
Second - Uhm because it's a 9 person game so 3 votes = L-2
d3x wrote:@Adrien- I'll allow that I asked the question in an odd manner. Let me rephrase... Please comment on something actually happening instead of RVS crap. What are your thoughts on what is legitimately happening in the game{as opposed to the back and forth with Xite}. I tend to agree that the RVS benefits Scum more, thus I'd like us out of it.
Yeah, but even with a slight explanation, you can make them feel a little more pressured. Honestly, when people vote me without a reason, even if it is a wagon, I feel a lot less pressured than when someone comes at me with a case. I think starting off with a flimsy case is fine, because the rest goes based on their reaction.Budja wrote:Unexplained votes have more pressure at this early stage where cases are quite scanty.
Also, you call that WIFOM? That doesn't make sense.
AurorusVox wrote:To be fair to budja, you can vote someone for minor reasons to provide pressure, and build your case off of the resulting responses.Offering no reasons is...odd, since it doesn't allow the person to defend themselves.
I meant without an explanation.Xite91 wrote:Hey guys, I have a suggestion to move the game forward a little bit faster.
Before you read the suggestion, I would like to point out that this is a yes or no (to the suggestiong) type thing and there is a valid reason for it.
Now that I have said this, I would like the earls to claim
If you don't like this plan just say you don't like it, trust me I will accept that, as long as you accept that I will not at this time give a reason to why.
Clarification as to why?nocase wrote:i'm caught up. i'll probably reread for some clarification but i'm caught up.
vote: adrien c.
fos: beefster.
How do you figure?Budja wrote: @Xite, you miss the point, massclaim is more powerful if we wait.
7 but what's your point? that's not really a case just n opinionnocase wrote:xite, on a scale of one to ten (one being super town, five being neutral, ten being super scum), where would you place budja?
budja, yes, i do realize you've switched your read on vox, but how does trying to disguise discomfort with cool when under pressure indicate uncomfortable scum as opposed to uncomfortable town?