CAUSE YOU SAID NO GRAMMAR, YET YOU FAILED TO END YOUR SENTENCE WITH A PREPOSITION
THOUGH YOU DID LEAVE OUT A COMMA
I don't like how he dropped his yelling act at the same time that he made this post. Seriousness + worry = I think he's scum, so I'm going to keep my vote on him at the moment.Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:One it was because it was RVS. Two was to help form a bandwagon on him to see how he would react. So far, it's working. Like for example:Socrates wrote:@SSBF: Why did you vote MPR?Why is he concerned about a bandwagon that isn't even based on him being scummy? It's not like we're planning on lynching him yet.MehPlusRawr wrote:Oh, hey, I don't feel like shouting. Let's wagon someone else. I have a feeling this MPR dude is town.
MehPlusRawr wrote:Actually, I just couldn't figure out a way to say it in caps that didn't sound grammatically awkward. And yeah, anyone who gets voted 5 times in 5 posts gets concerned, unless they're a jester. Hi Elli.
Then what are you concerned about?MehPlusRawr wrote:And no, I'm not *concerned* that I'll be lynched, as such. I figured that I should comment on the fact that I'm the closest to dying as of yet.
Yeah. But first, as far as MPR goes, I'm doing some thinking and I'm also very familiar with his meta...however, I believe you have it wrong.Socrates wrote: Thoughts on anything other than MPR?
The speed of the wagon was pretty alarming, I'll admit, and he reacted exactly like a townie should, IMO. I found it pretty alarming that the reaction to my post pointing out that I thought he contradicted himself a little created a firestorm of votes on him. So, for right now, he's fine in my book.MehPlusRawr wrote:This, by the way, is not a contradiction. Again, a rephrasement is in order- I'm not worried that I'll be lynched from scumminess right now, but I'm slightly nervous that a whole bunch of people voted me quickly. Quicklynches are bad. Like quicksilver. I think that gives you cancer.MehPlusRawr wrote: The second quote was attempting to rephrase the term "concerned," because though it's obviously a matter of interest to me that I'm being wagoned, I'm not actually worried that I'm about to be lynched.
The wagon was growing too quickly for my liking. And yes, you did say that I was concerned about being lynched, in this quote.
The first bolded quote: How does he know what scum's going to do? Furthermore, that's -quite- a lot of speculation of the twist we have in this game.Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:@Korts: Keeping xRECKONERx alive until endgame will be a very daunting task to do. We do not want to lynch him for sure and we obviously cannot afford him to be NK'd. With no protection role for the town, scum is going to be hard-pressed to keep him around, especially if he were to give his all to help the town. Prehaps him being completely useless until endgame would help his chance of survival, as scums like useless townies, but we all know how much we hate useless confirmed townies.
Basically, the chances of xRECKONERx living to endgame is very, very slim.
However, while we don't want xRECKONERx to die, one benefit of his death by scums hand is that scum would have to give up one of there power role and become Mafia Goon. It would suck to see a confirmed townie die, but at least scum loses a power role, so that's something to gain from xRECKONERx's death.
Either way, the Town Power Roles should do nothing to him during the Night.
And I had another realization. With a Vigilante, if we lynch scum ToDay, kill scum ToNight, and lynch scum agan Tommorow, town wins. Yes, a Day 2 victory for the Town is possible. But we need to be completely accurate with lynching and the Vigilante killing scums and hope that the Vigilante doesn't die.
RVS ends for different people at different times. You can't dictate when someone's RVS is over.Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:Just want to say that we're out of RVS already. Do you have anything you want to say about the game?RayFrost wrote:ugh... 3 pages while I'm asleep. Not cool guys.
Vote: Incognito
You didn't say hi.
Well, I like to pick up psychological tells as well as logical ones. Eagerness, jealousy, anger and frustration are good places to start, and I see his post as nothing but eager to get the killing started. Otherwise, all of SSBF's contributions have been about MPR's wagon (which I don't like the speed of) and dictating peoples' RVS lengths. Right now, he's the scummiest person I know, but it's only page 4.SpyreX wrote:SSBF doesn't even strike me as all the scummy at the mo.
Regardless of that aside from twirling mustaches that 87 reads like some magnificent stretching.
Time for a crusade!
Unvote, Vote: DemonHybrid
First bolded quote: Notice how I said otherwise. Spyre said I was stretching on my vote of SSBF, and my vote of SSBF was due to the Reck post.RayFrost wrote:Lies -SSBF has "discussed" the matter of lynching reck, how we should spend our time day by day, and the MPR wagon stuff (along with a style-wise attack on me).
You just have your MPR wagon stuff and this new attack on SSBF soon after people question / attack you about only focusing on MPR
Comparably... you would be scummy from your own standards.
First bold: Logical clarification: I didn't say that he was scummy because and only because he was only talking about the MPR wagon and dictating RVS votes. Again, you missed the word "otherwise".RayFrost wrote:DemonHybrid wrote: First bolded quote: Notice how I said otherwise. Spyre said I was stretching on my vote of SSBF, and my vote of SSBF was due to the Reck post.
And sure, he talked about how we should spend our time, but that post isn't really relevant to the scumminess of people nor who should vote who. It was merely a suggestion of how to use a minor mechanic of the game, so I didn't really consider it important.
Also: I never said that he's scummy ONLY because he's talking about those things and only those things. You're warping my words around a bit.So... "aside from the other things he's said, he's only said this" - really great argument here. I'm just blown away by your genius.Care to point out which reck post?If you are talking about the only one I've commented on, it cameafteryour vote, so yah.
Fair enough.
I'm pointing out standards - you are as guilty for a limited quantity of discussion as SSBF is, and you've jumped ship from MPR as it shows it's not happening to SSBF right when pressure is mounting on him, which can be seen (and is being seen by me) as opportunistic wagon hopping.
Read again: "and my vote of SSBF was due toSuper Smash Bros. Fan wrote:@Korts: Keeping xRECKONERx alive until endgame will be a very daunting task to do. We do not want to lynch him for sure and we obviously cannot afford him to be NK'd. With no protection role for the town, scum is going to be hard-pressed to keep him around, especially if he were to give his all to help the town. Prehaps him being completely useless until endgame would help his chance of survival, as scums like useless townies, but we all know how much we hate useless confirmed townies.
Basically, the chances of xRECKONERx living to endgame is very, very slim.
However, while we don't want xRECKONERx to die, one benefit of his death by scums hand is that scum would have to give up one of there power role and become Mafia Goon. It would suck to see a confirmed townie die, but at least scum loses a power role, so that's something to gain from xRECKONERx's death.
Either way, the Town Power Roles should do nothing to him during the Night.
And I had another realization. With a Vigilante, if we lynch scum ToDay, kill scum ToNight, and lynch scum agan Tommorow, town wins. Yes, a Day 2 victory for the Town is possible. But we need to be completely accurate with lynching and the Vigilante killing scums and hope that the Vigilante doesn't die.
Yeah, lots of posts = the ability to take another minute to write something else. Humans are miraculous creatures and can really multitask + manage their time in amazing ways.RayFrost wrote:So lots of posts = lots of time?DemonHybrid wrote:SSBF contributed to a big chunk of this topic's posts. He's had time to talk about other things.
I guess that means lurkers are completely innocent if they only talk about a couple of things?
Because, on a subconscious level, it expresses the fact that he wants the game to be over regardless, which is non-conductive to a pro-town attitude. Sure, he posts it from the view as town wanting to rid scum quickly, however, I find it weird that he needed to express it in such a fashion and might be an attempt to just win over town instead of making a good argument against scum. Town shouldn't be focusing on the end of the game unless they have scum in their sights (as in, one more scum to kill between X amount of people) or it's a LyLo situation (both are high pressure situations); they should be focusing on who's scum and who isn't, and on a psychological level, it rings out asIncognito wrote:Can you explain this more? SSBF talked about the game being over quickly from the perspective of town ridding scum quickly, so I don't see how you jumped to the conclusion that he seemed eager to have the game over as a scumbag.Post 87, DemonHybrid wrote:The second bolded quote: He seems to be very set on how long this game should last. Call it gut, but that kind of speculation subconsciously rings out as somewhat scummy to me. It shows eagerness for the game to be over.
Sort of....basically, I think he's trying to look pro-town when the very very basic concept of that post is something town shouldn't be worrying about at this point in the game (The very beginning of Day 1). The end of the game shouldn't matter at this point, and he's thinking way too far ahead. Therein lies the scumminess.Incognito wrote:So, I think what you're basically trying to get at is that you feel like his post basically just pointed out the obvious and that it looked like an attempt to seem like he was analyzing stuff when in actuality he wasn't.
Why the emphasis on "somewhat scummy"? You voted him in that post - wouldn't that mean that he was your scummiest pick at that moment?
vezokpiraka wrote:Anything intresting in the last 6 pages?
I am always down for a lynch on DH
Vote DemonHybrid
So, no thoughts, whatsoever?vezokpiraka wrote:I did a bad thing. I read the entire thread out of boredom.
Now I am sure my vote is where it should be. On scum.
And why not, since you seem to have the time and the desire to make a case against me? Withholding information is anti-town, and it doesn't help us out in the least.vezokpiraka wrote:I don't need to do that now.
Not really.MehPlusRawr wrote: However, I did just ISO DH, and so far, he's been pretty passive. Though he weakly posts twice about my wagon, he soon drops it and defends me as town- I notice, however, that most of my wagon had dropped by this point. There's a possibility that DH was scum trying to push a lynch on me (before he realized that my wagon was RVS/stupid), then attempted to make it look like he hadn't pushed a wagon on somebody who wasn't scummy.
I believe this is the invitation of the speculation that you meant.Korts wrote: I really don't like DemonHybrid's post 87. What little of the post is actually spent on answering the question in reply to which the whole was apparently written is concerned with SSBF's setup speculation, which was well-reasoned as far as I can see. Nor can I see scum motives that DemonHybrid is ascribing to the bolded sections. Seems like a bad attempt at painting someone black. I somewhat agree with the target, but not with the particular reasoning--why not attack me, for instance, when I invited that speculation you so harshly attack?
While I disagree and ultimately feel that a confirmed townie should -never- be targeted for a lynch regardless of the situation, I thought SSBF's reply was scummy simply because of his wording. It feels like he's speaking for the scum, something which I find to be somewhat of a slip.Korts wrote: As for Reck getting vigged: no. If Reck is to die by the town's hands, he will be lynched, no way are we going to vanillize a town killing role. I think this discussion can be fruitful--Reck's death means robbing the scum of being able to fuck with our heads, but also the town of a confirmed innocent down the line. Now, I think having a confirmed innocent in the endgame is very valuable, but will the scum keep him around for that long? Discuss.
^Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:He has still not answer Socrates's question on who else is scum.
I gave you way more than enough time to find an example of mine of which you find scummy. Now another question comes up, someone asks you for a scum-list (which is way more important than your weak backing of one person) and you completely ignore them.vezokpiraka wrote:All of DH posts are scummy.
Yeah. Elli is town. That's all for now.
1. I'm seriously astounded that you'd attack such an obviously silly RVS vote. I really have nothing else to say other than it feels like you've never played mafia before if you think RVS posts like that are "useless". So, why my RVS vote, and why not -anyone elses-? Curious.vezok wrote:
1. Useless.
2. Says someone is scummy just cause of RVS. I don't like this statement. He is trying hard to find a way to keep his vote there.
3. Asks a good question. Townie points.
4. Sees the wagon on MPR stalled. Starts voting for SSBF. With little to no reason.
5. I am not sure what to make of this post.
6. Says SSBF is scummy for telling some people that the RVS was over. Says SSBF is his major suspectbutthis can change because there are only 4 pages.
7. This is exactly what you said. You said he was scummy because he only discussed this points. You are back pedalling now.
8. This is some kind of AtE. I see it as scum concerned with his image. He tries to defend every little thing that people acused him for.
9. Tries to discredit SSBF.
10. He says that Ray is town. Especially if SSBF flips scum.
11. Says that SSBF is scum because he wants to end the game quickly. I want to end it quickly too. An open setup is not something too intresting. You want it to be over quickly. It feels to me that SSBF is VT.
12. He says he is scum because he wants to end the day quickly. It's just bored town from my perspective than scum.
13. Again some AtE. FoSes me in case my wagon goes off. He wants to be able tow switch without too much trouble and at the same be able to say : " It was just a FoS".
14. Still thinks SSBF is scum. Now for some very stupid reason. He feels like he is trying to get people to follow him and vote for SSBF. He tries to find every minute detail on him.
15. He begins to suspect me. More like go with the flow.
16. He now switches his vote on me because there are less people voting for me. Why not continue to vote for suspect SSBF.
Actually, I wonder two things about Socrates at the moment.vezokpiraka wrote:I think this is the fourth PBPA I did.
Demon's last post. Now he is trying to acuse Socartes because he didn't lash out at me to respond his questions.
I'd like your reply to my rebuttal of your PBPA, since you seem to have time to post.vezokpiraka wrote:If SSBF flips town we lynch Sera.
End of deal.
I agree...things are getting much more jumbled.Nachomamma8 wrote:Is it just me, or do the reasons people have for switching get shittier and shittier as we build more wagons?
Consider yourself #2 on my scumlist now.Nachomamma8 wrote:Unvote, Vote: Seraphim
What is it about this post that compelled you to make a decision to switch your vote?xRECKONERx wrote:Nacho, don't be fucking stupid.
We're fucking lynching Seraphim.
Because it shows lack of care about who dies and a willingness to go with the flow. And no, I don't. But at the rate that you switched your vote, it's a bit irking.Nachomamma8 wrote:And why is being flipfloppy scummy? Do you honestly expect me to have rock-solid reads on Day 1?
It is a bit strange that him, one of the more vocal players, just completely dropped off of the face of the earth now that he has pressure on him.Fate wrote:I'm willing to hammer Seraphim for the greater good, obv.
Debating fakeclaims in the QT Seraph?
Ray makes a TON of good points about Korts. Lots of contradictions and a complete overlook of Vezok and right onto Seraphim.RayFrost wrote:I'm just going to start with korts here, as I feel taht his 15 posts will be the quickest to read through and deconstruct.
I'm going to ignore some of them to deal with the ones I feel are scummy. Feel free to bitch and moan abut how I left out like... two posts that seem remotely townish and a bunch of worthless ones. You might get a reply.
Quick comment on a perceived contradiction with this post and korts' later comment that his first "100% serious vote" is here.
The contradiction here is brought to light by the extensive discussion that korts made aboutlots of players other than nachothat were actually more solid than his reasonoing for his vote, not to mention theutter and complete lack of any mention of seraphim. This means seraphim didn't catch his eye...at all. Looking at the actual timing of the post, I would like to point out that this is whentremendous pressureand an entire wagon was forming on vezok, not to mention the attacks on DH. The sudden attack on seraphim was born from nothing new that was major since his previous postings: deflection at its finest. Not to mention that he's made multiple spiels regarding vezok, but has yet to actually vote him. Oh, he hims and haws, saying that he would,but...and then points to something else.
I also find the contradiction of emotion in the talk about reck's lynching or not-lynching relative to his posts regarding play to be odd, not to mention the fact that korts barely pushed his wagon on seraphim. He made a small case (small compared to the reasoning that he pointed out for disliking other players in his initial catch up post + the combined cases of other players), and he just makes small nudges, such as this one.
I would also liek to point out theextreme disparitybetween this post and this post, each made a day apart. The first one is before my own case on the vezok lynch, and he states seraphim is active (when sera hadn't really been posting at all... HMMMMMM). And then, after my case, he just goes "is this a policy lynch?" when it clearly wasn't. I'd made a case, he went against his previous comments on getting behind a vezok lynch and instead sat happily on his seraphim vote without contributing virtually anything and making weak questions with no real evidence of having actually read the case put forth or, if he had, that he had deliberately misrepresented it in order to weaken it and provide an excuse to either draw out the game or at least not change his vote.
Each instance he's spoken of vezok, he's had a distractor along with it. I'm going to call korts + vezok right here and now.
I'd also like to point out to the rest of you yet again that korts' postings have repeatedly stated that vezok is scummy, but he's also then said "BUT WAIT, LOOK OVER THERE!" instead of actually pursuing it.
I actually had this written in my head before the day started, but it changed a bit when I actually read korts' postings. He's avidly avoided joining a vezok wagon at all times: when it was starting up, an apparantly non-serious vote on nacho, and when it was peaking: a mention that he disliked vezok's play but a distractor in the form of a seraphim vote. Korts has made many mentions of vezok, not pursued them, not fully engaged in them, and held them at arms length as if hoping that the stink will not attract to him. Distancing. Defending through distraction. Ignoring cases.
I don't really like it.MehPlusRawr wrote:Korts, L-1, claim.
If he's scum, he'll claim gunsmith to get a CC. Let's *not* get a CC if he claims that, unless everybody talks and agrees on letting a possible CCer claim.
So explain what changed your mind about him. It looks like you're bandwagoning blatantly.dramonic wrote:Yes, I said those two things.
So?
...and that's it. That's an important vote, a vote ending the day, and you aren't going to say anything else?vezokpiraka wrote:unvote
Vote MPR