I won'tekiM wrote:@mod--- normal wording would be "half rounded down plus one", I guess...
@yabba - From experience, games where people vote early and start bandwagons get going quicker. It rarely hurts.
What's a semi-random vote? You've got a semi-reason you don't want to share, yet you chastised Alduskkel for the same thing. Huh?
Ehh, the thing that bothers me about that question was it seems like pretty obvious rolefishing to me. Anyone who replied that they were in favor of N0 vigging was not the vig, and vise versa. From a town standpoint, what were you trying to gain by asking that question?Ythan wrote:Then you don't believe me. What am I supposed to freak out about it or try to prove to you what I was thinking? No. I was speculating on the setup and thinking about the one kill.
No, finding the number of players who would vig would narrow down the people who would be a vig and out them to the mafia. That is extremely anti-town.Ythan wrote:Knowing how players in this game would act as a vigilante, a role whose actions are immediately apparent if successful, would aid in my speculation. I was trying to narrow it down but in this complicated setup that really won't be fruitful for some time.