Nativity Mafia - Game Over, Praise The Lord!

Squonk · Post Post #5 (isolation #0) » Tue Oct 25, 2005 8:31 am

Confirmatory....

Squonk · Post Post #45 (isolation #1) » Sat Oct 29, 2005 8:43 am

Vote SSB!

Squonk · Post Post #51 (isolation #2) » Sat Oct 29, 2005 9:15 am

Upon re-reading:

Unvote SSB!
Vote Puzzle

Double-bluff attempt?

Squonk · Post Post #104 (isolation #3) » Sun Oct 30, 2005 9:38 pm

Unvote Puzzle
Vote babyJesus

Squonk · Post Post #112 (isolation #4) » Mon Oct 31, 2005 1:29 am

Gah...

Unvote babyJesus

until we have more clarity on this masonhood thing. SSB, please confirm that you are both masons, somthing that you so far have hinted at.

Squonk · Post Post #194 (isolation #5) » Fri Nov 04, 2005 10:19 am

Vote !Chucklez!

Probably a cultist, could be even the leader.

Squonk · Post Post #197 (isolation #6) » Fri Nov 04, 2005 11:11 am

And who says leadership cannot pass on?

FOS Fritzler

Squonk · Post Post #233 (isolation #7) » Mon Nov 07, 2005 6:39 am

I agree, vote stays.

Squonk · Post Post #254 (isolation #8) » Thu Nov 10, 2005 8:46 pm

Vote dybeck

Squonk · Post Post #261 (isolation #9) » Fri Nov 11, 2005 12:57 am

Works for me.

Unvote Darquiel
Vote SSB!

Squonk · Post Post #264 (isolation #10) » Fri Nov 11, 2005 1:55 am

Bah, too many D-players.

Correction:

Unvote dybeck
Vote SSB!

Now to TonyMontana: how about paying attention to what other players than I are doing?

Fritxler led the voting with a Dybeck vote without giving further explanation. Often this is a cop tell, so worth following. Dybeck countered with what basically amounts to a cop claim, with the statement "THIS is your boy. You'll see. " - well, we'll see and if it turns out that SSB! is innocent, we have a nice lynch candidate tomorrow with the would-be cop Dybeck.

Squonk · Post Post #269 (isolation #11) » Fri Nov 11, 2005 2:41 am

OK, so dybeck is probably not a cop, in contrast to what I thought, but his reasoning makes sense. I'm keeping my vote.

Squonk · Post Post #274 (isolation #12) » Fri Nov 11, 2005 4:12 am

I find it interesting that what I consider to be good logic leads to a pile up of votes on me, including unnecessary denegrating comments like those of Thoth and SSB! - I think you will find the logic that I have used in many other games.

Squonk · Post Post #280 (isolation #13) » Fri Nov 11, 2005 10:15 pm

No. You're picking the wrong victim.

I am a sheperd, a vanilla townie.

Squonk · Post Post #314 (isolation #14) » Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:24 am

Good. Now that we tend to agree that I'm innocent, I would still appreciate those who attacked my posts with the term "crap logic" to explain WHY they do not agree with the applied logic. I still maintain that my logic was sound.

Squonk · Post Post #316 (isolation #15) » Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:54 am

Point taken ont he Dybeck thing. But...

Puzzle wrote:the "cop-tell" reasoning falls in the bin considering that :
- we have lynched a paranoid cop.
- there is already another claimed cop.

I beg to disagee. We know we had a a paranoid cop, which opens up the possibilities of a quartet of cops of varying degrees of usefulness, as sometimes used in bigger games. The fact that we have another player claiming cop only strengthens that possibility, it does not weaken it.

Squonk · Post Post #376 (isolation #16) » Sun Nov 20, 2005 7:45 am

Bah.

Unvote SSB!
Vote Werebear

Squonk · Post Post #445 (isolation #17) » Tue Nov 29, 2005 4:39 am

I love simple situations.

vote Iammars

Squonk · Post Post #455 (isolation #18) » Sat Dec 03, 2005 10:25 pm

Why are you doubting that? We have a dead cult leader who had at least one night to recruit.

Squonk · Post Post #474 (isolation #19) » Tue Dec 06, 2005 6:40 am

Well done Puzzle! Very compelling.

Vote Tyfo

Squonk · Post Post #565 (isolation #20) » Thu Dec 15, 2005 9:05 pm

In general they are, but there are exceptions, This looks like one.

Vote no lynch

Squonk · Post Post #567 (isolation #21) » Fri Dec 16, 2005 12:49 am

I can't believe we had 4 scum, including a Godfather, in addition to a SK AND a cult. Way too unbalanced.

Squonk · Post Post #574 (isolation #22) » Tue Dec 20, 2005 11:16 pm

Fritzlers sequence is fine with me as well.

Squonk · Post Post #634 (isolation #23) » Fri Dec 23, 2005 11:51 pm

I'm ready to put the lynching vote on raj. Fritzler, is there any burning reason why you want Darquiel or her replacement to claim now instead of tomoorow?

Squonk · Post Post #642 (isolation #24) » Sun Dec 25, 2005 12:29 am

Ooohhh.... merry christmas everybody!

vote rajrhcpfreak

Squonk · Post Post #649 (isolation #25) » Mon Jan 02, 2006 11:48 pm

d8P, I think you really should claim your role powers now.

Squonk · Post Post #664 (isolation #26) » Tue Jan 03, 2006 8:02 pm

Any last words, VisMaior?

Squonk · Post Post #666 (isolation #27) » Tue Jan 03, 2006 9:04 pm

Scum away!

Vote VisMaior