Mini 1018ÔÇôÔÇôDNA Evidence (Game Over)

[Hrezs]

confirm

[Hrezs]

Vote:Korashk

holy crap that was a scummy reaction to a softpower claim

[Hrezs]

Unsolicited claims are pointless without justification, especially semi-power roles, all it does is give the Mafia more information. This is a bad thing.

Oh, So him giving information to scum makes him scum? Doesn't explain your "lynch the power" reaction.

How am I testing the waters to see who would make a good mislynch? I'm trying to evoke responses to get the game moving.

If my vote for someone has a weak reason, shouldn't I change it anyways? And how is it scummy to do so anyway? Isn't voting at a whim the

same

as voting for little reason?

I don't like this post. It feels panicky and is like he's trying real hard to justify himself in a "Hey, I'm doing normal stuff, right? right?" type of manner.

[Hrezs]

Unsolicited claims are pointless without justification, especially semi-power roles, all it does is give the Mafia more information. This is a bad thing.

Oh, So him giving information to scum makes him scum? Doesn't explain your "lynch the power" reaction.

Where I usually play most of the voting is not done with the intention of lynching. It is done to get those that act suspiciously to explain themselves. I call it pressure voting.

I voted, he explained, the explanation was satisfactory for now.

hmm, ok. I still find it suspect that you thought softclaiming was suspicious at all. You can ask people questions without voting for them.

Unvote

Still not liking Prox. You can be excited for a game without being eager and his rolefishing is mad suspect(just because you preface it with an "I know this will be seen as rolefishing" does not change what it is or how scummy it is)

Are you also suggesting zwek's supposed partner to claim just because you think that there may not be a doc in this game? Dunno what would give you the impression of maybe no doc already.

This is also a very good point. With 1 claim there's no way you can accurately guess things like that without being scum

[Hrezs]

If we were to choose someone, it would be one of you two. Not to mention depending on who you choose, the case against them will just be nonexistent, and defending yourself against a case like that is pretty hard/impossible

[Hrezs]

I would like prox to claim

[Hrezs]

EBWOP: @hrezs: and why would you prefer a prox claim over koreshk.

Right now with koreshk I have this weird idea in my head that makes me hesitate/confused a little. It basically makes it so that I'm much more comfortable lynching prox than him. His "I don't claim" is dumb and his weird defensive posts that he chained together strike me as off, like I can't really tell what he's doing.

Vote:Prox

Completely against No Lynching

[Hrezs]

glad he didn't claim a scan, just makes him super scummy
unsure who he's protecting, but I assume its a rber or assassin or something

[Hrezs]

Unvote
Vote:shotty

yeah, you're being extremely inconsistent as if you're making it up as you go along

[Hrezs]

still think prox is scum, but shotty is just asking to die

[Hrezs]

still think prox is scum, but shotty is just asking to die

How does this work out in your line of logic?

I am a cop, well half of one. Some one counter claim if they dont believe me

Town doesn't say things like this.

[Hrezs]

shotty at 6
prox at 3
3 nonvoters

[Hrezs]

recounted, 6 on shotty 2 on prox, did you miss zwets vote?

[Hrezs]

I am a cop, well half of one.

Some one counter claim if they dont believe me

His intentions are VERY clear. He wants zwets partner to claim and out more power in case a doc exists

[Hrezs]

EBWOP: to increase his teams chances of successfully getting off a NK on power.

Also, his backpedaling on his claim was ridiculous, why claim cop when he's a dna decoder or whatever

[Hrezs]

So you're saying he's bad enough to do that as town, but not bad enough to gambit like that as scum?

[Hrezs]

me too, but its directed at me so I'm biased

[Hrezs]

Korashk, what? Prox claimed townie

[Hrezs]

What does "I find it telling" even mean? Do you think it was scummy? If so, why not say that? Talk about a weak accusation.

FoS: Mysterio

Please tell me you did not just write this.

In other news, I am inclined towards a Prox/shotty scumteam thanks to shotty's refusal to act on his so-called investigation.

Unvote; Vote: shotty

That's L-1, I think, people.

Please explain to me what the problem was with what I'm saying. He accused me of tossing out "weak accusations", yet he does the exact same thing in the post. So I called him on it. The he goes on with his post saying that I must know something about shotty or be scum with him, when there are other explanations for my thinking, the most obvious being that I don't understand why scum would try claim the other half. What possible reason would he have for doing it, just being stupid?

What? He said you threw out weak accusations, (like against me) and said you were scummy for it(hing: "I find it telling" means scummy). He has a base, you however just said that I'm likely scum. It's not the same at all.

[Hrezs]

prox claimed vanilla
zwet claimed dna collector or something

can't tell if don is dumb or scum especially after his whole "everyone vote shotty" earlier

[Hrezs]

I totally overplayed my role, i felt it day 1 and was planning on claiming at the start of day 2 if for some reason I lived through the night(The only 2 other people I thought had a possibility of dying were prox and kat, if they were town. Its because the 3 of us are the ones that knew shotty the most)

i felt terrible when you guys lynched Zaj, with all the scanning power I'm surprised he wasn't chosen..

[Hrezs]

ebwop: its funny because