Vote: dalt54321
For having more than two numbers in his username. (/unoriginalreason)
That's not what I meant. She/he (goddamn lack of gender icons) either agreed with one or another, at least in my view. If she thought that it was scum distancing, as she said later, she should have elaborated, no? We all could be missing important things here. Besides, I asked her. Not you. I don't really mind you answering, but may I ask why did you answer?PranaDevil wrote:Erm... Because everyone should suspect everyone at this stage, just some more so than others? That's what I would suggest anyway. It seems strange to say you can basically only suspect one person at a time, especially to then push that issue.
FoS: Saga
Wrong. Completely wrong. My post was 1 minute before you posted. Then you said "preview edit" which was obviously going to be my answer. Don't go "I answered it lolz". Then what was the preview edit about?Xite91 wrote:Ironically, this post was right after it;
Xite91 wrote:I think it has something to do with the suspicion on you. I dunno, you two just seem to be scum-distancing to me (Of course it's RVS, so I'm waiting to actually vote you until you do something vote-worthy. Also, I've always wanted to lynch a commie )
Preview edit - Already on it
/buddying and attacking the person who attacked Prana. Which is moar buddying. /audienceclappingplzI'm going to ignore that as a part of the case, becuase Mr.Old Timer, there are plenty of times that I'll just facepalm at someone asking stupid questions, then I'll answer the stupid question, whether it was directed at me or not, I know others to do that too. Also, what if he were to try and push a lynch on me? Then come to find out that I actually DID answer the question. I'm more apt to believe that Saga is scum based on this than Prana, unless he's coaching Saga, but eh /shrug