The above statement is true.Scott Brosius wrote:ConfidAnon replaces Xite91 effective immediately
Also nocase . . . I am nadroj15.
The above statement is true.Scott Brosius wrote:ConfidAnon replaces Xite91 effective immediately
I agree with this.Col.Cathart, 28 wrote:Random wagon is good in RVS, and in 9 people game, going at L-2 is not that hard either. But since it's a random wagon, it has about 1% of ending with an actual lynch, and yet you are concerned already. Why is that? Something to hide?
This rubs me the wrong way, but purely gut.AV, 35 wrote:This might be something to do with the fact that it's the first non-newbie game I've played and its a lot more active than what I'm used to in the newbie games xD I admit I was initially a little nervous that I went to L-2 in less than a day. But I know that it's nothing to be concerned about, because it's RVS and someone needs to get voted in order to get the game rolling, and so I didn't want to explicitly show my immediate reaction in my posts (head over heart). Perhaps it still filtered through, which is why I look shifty?
My only modded game he played erratically as town.AV, 238 wrote:Based on what? I think I could do with hearing some "XS is town" reasoning to balance out my brainload of "XS is scum" reads.
This seems like a pretty big stretch.AV, 269 wrote:Adrien C has never actually voted for Budja.
He earlier said that Budja's actions were the scummiest thing he had seen, but never voted for him. Has he posted this unvote of Budja by mistake, just because he was playing too many games? Or was he trying to blend with the town, by misrepresenting his vote?
Vote: Adrien C
At the top of the page you voted for him. You are now on Budja, true, but you were one of the four AC votes on the page.XScorpion, 275 wrote:Since when was I voting Adrien?
No way I would suggest four scum. I wouldn't be surprised for there to be one scum (at least, but probably not more than one) in the group.AV, 276 wrote:Are you suggesting there are actually four scum in this setup? (of course you aren't, I jest) How many scum do you think are in that list of four that you've identified?
But seriously, I don't think it's odd that we've all started picking up on AC. After all, due to his somewhat-lurky behaviour, I had been getting a neutral vibe from him because he hadn't really been posting much, in the way of townie or scummy posts. But his recent post with the unvoting was a tad suspect, and that caused me to pay more attention to him. I understand that you think my vote might be harsh based on his unvoting of Budja, but as I said to XS, it was that combined with an uneasy feeling from the rest of his post (especially his desire to vote for one of Beefster or XScorpion, without actually making an effort to get any reads on them)
Also, yes, I acknowledge that it can just be a mistake on his part, in which he thought that he had already voted, but even given this, why did he feel the need to clarify who he was unvoting? It seemed like he wanted to point out who he was allegedly voting, as though, perhaps, he had realised that he hadn't voted Budja and wanted to pull the wool over our eyes. I know that I didn't realise his vote was elsewhere until I ISO'd him recently.
-Pure numbers, nothing more.AV, 288 wrote:-What has made it less likely that there are scum in that group than before?
-You said that you thought there was probably only one, even when the group consisted of four players. This would assume that three players are town who have been convinced to vote for another town aligned player. Isn't it more likely that just two town players would be convinced to mislynch, as opposed to three making this mistake?
-Do you think that the votes on Adrien are because of a particular player's arguments, or because of Adrien's actions themselves?
I agree, but it can still be a scumtell.Budja, 289 wrote:Wagoning is good (@Xscorp, within reason).
I don't see a particurlarly townie or scummy slant to that post . . . just a player interested in the game, which can happen regardless of alignment (admittedly though, I'm not that suspicious of him right now, just wondering what you see that I don't.)AV, 323 wrote:XS gaining townie points for his last post imo...
Alright, I see, that's possible.AV, 326 wrote:Oh, I thought scum might prefer a game where not much is going on and things stagnate because players who are less interested might be less committed to scumhunting and reading posts as carefully. So by venting his frustration that people are allowing the discussion to slow down, I took that as a townie frustration.
I checked nocase's profile. His most recent post was on the 15th . . . maybe he's just away?Beefster wrote:I claim cop.
I'm still waiting for nocase to respond to my defense. Seeing how he hasn't replied for a over a day, something fishy is going on here.
Not posting a response =/= failure to read a post.AurorusVox wrote:Rhinox, Budja, ConfidAnon -
None of you have made any responses to my defence against Rhinox's points. Anyone fancy saying something about that or do you just want to lynch me without even reading my posts?
It is this argument in particular that has led me to vote you.Rhinox wrote:Final thoughts: I think its saying something that Beefy voted, suspected, or questioned everyone in the game at least once, accept for AV. That is noteable because beefy was always demanding reasons or responded whenever someone suspected him or voted him, and beefy didn't even respond at all when AV called him his top suspect and voted. I think that points to a solid connection between the 2, and AV is scum #2.
Suspicious of it as well. My vote for you might as well be him, I approve of both lynches, but you are slightly scummier to me (purely gut).XScorpion wrote:Okay, that's all I wanted to know. What do you make of XScorpion's lack of vote/scumhunting of Beefy, and his defences of him as townie (meta) and his faith in the claim?
I was hoping this could have communicated the save in the event I died before time to claim.ConfidAnon wrote:nocase, sorry, I should probablygo back and readthe thread, I totally did not realize you were voting him prior to voting BeefsteR. I didn't spend my time during the night phase thinking about this game mucH.
Don't worry, I'll try to reread and have a clearer mind about how this game has gone.Of course, when I need time, I happen to get busier, but I will make this happen soon.Considering my reasoning so far today has been horrible, I'll go ahead and unvote now.
Unvote, Vote: d3x