Mafia on Holy Orders (Game Over!)

[Vi]

Vote Count I

~ Squirrel Rave

Furcolow (L-5) ~ animorpherv1, AGar,

Locke Lamora, Friend,

vezokpiraka, Sebguer

Beefster (L-6) ~ Locke Lamora, Friend, Iecerint
Friend (L-7) ~ Socrates, Plum
Locke Lamora (L-8) ~

Sebguer, Furcolow,

Furcolow
Iecerint (L-8) ~ SocioPath,

Furcolow

zwetschenwasser (L-8) ~ mothrax,

Furcolow

Sebguer (L-8) ~ pacman
animorpherv1 (L-8) ~

Friend, Furcolow,

Wraith

Plum (L-9) ~

Friend

Wraith (L-9) ~

Plum

animorpherv1 (L-9) ~

Friend, Furcolow

SocioPath (L-9) ~

Beefster, Iecerint

vezokpiraka (L-9) ~

Wraith

Not Voting:

AGar, animorpherv1, Beefster,

Fate,

Friend, Furcolow, Iecerint, Locke Lamora, mothrax, pacman, Plum, Sebguer, SocioPath, Socrates, vezokpiraka, Wraith,

zwetschenwasser, Beefster

-Fate and zwetschenwasser are being prodded...

-All players have confirmed!

-The smell of smoke surrounds animorpherv1 as of post 41...

-A warm light shines on Iecerint as of post 138!

-Morning is now over.

--With 17 alive, it will take 9 to lynch.

---For my own sake, I'm taking the numbers off pacman's name.
---I can safely say I didn't expect THIS much activity. Let me know if I missed something.

Battery power:

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||

(97%)

[animorpherv1]

@Wraith:

If he is town, he is going to lose it for us. I DO NOT want to risk it. I almost never spport policy lynches, but I feel like we need to lynch Furcolow.

Also, hmmm.... something is in the air...

[Iecerint]

Also, Furcolow:

I'm lynching you because I've taken a look in several other games, and you have provided

terrible

reasoning in every game, and you act even more scummy than I DO.

This is the one policy lynch I support.

This put something in the air.

I like the burgeoning Beefster wagon better than my RVS SP vote.

Unvote; Vote: Beefster

.

Different reason, though. First, the claim that they're "playing on one another" (positing 2 scum) looks like an attempt to tie someone to a scumfriend more than a reasoned analysis. Second, the worry about hammering looks faked; I don't think Furco has more than a handful of votes, and this is a Large game. Third, I think the defensiveness about his prior post that begins that one ("Of course my last post wasn't very useful") leans scummy.

This gave me a bright light.

[Beefster]

Unvote; Vote: Beefster

That post screams of posting just for the sake of posting.

Yeah. You're not much better. Try again. At least I've tried.

VOTE: Locke Lamora

From skimming earlier, I noticed that SP tended to post one liners. I would like it if he contributed more than one context-sensitive line at a time.

I did see the exchange between Furcolow and Friend (I think). It looked like they could both be scum playing off each other. It doesn't seem like the exchange that would happen between 2 townies.

[Iecerint]

Hmm?

[SocioPath]

That has to be the most amazing information-based vote count I have ever read.

It of in itself is almost like another player doing detailed wagon analysis.

As well as the deadline timer.

I mean, I read before hand that the vote counts were going to be like that, but seeing it in action is a wonderful site.

And thats only the first real one!

[zwetschenwasser]

Message from Heaven: Hello, I can only talk normally like this one post every two hundred. Otherwise I post like below.

zwet<knowledge of day start
furcolow>wraith
wraith=furcolow cheapness

ergo

zwet=

Vote: Wraith

[zwetschenwasser]

deadline timer importance<Wraithlynch
Wraith=scum <> $10

[Iecerint]

I wish you had formalized your limitations a bit more clearly.

[zwetschenwasser]

limitations=post by comparison
full sentences < legal
= = is

ergo

partial PR fail

[zwetschenwasser]

ergo = final clause of post
ergo = unnecessary
ergo = necessary for vote
<> = because

[zwetschenwasser]

PR = inconvenience
inconvenience > restrictiveness
communication impairment < most other PRs

[Beefster]

I'm going to take a wild guess that there is another player with post restrictions like this- and one of those 2 is scum.

[zwetschenwasser]

speculation < valuable
speculation < meaningful
speculation < thought out

ergo

Unvote; Vote: Beefster

[Plum]

Zwets, you should adopt this posting style more often. I agree with you in general and it's put Beefster on my map thar.

[Fate]

HAPPY SCUMDAY PLUMZ

[Fate]

Lol Nikanor made Vi change his bah post rule

[Fate]

Something's strange. Why would Ani not mention me and the supposed need for my policy lynchinz?

DONT U </3 ME ANI?

Vote: Ani

[Plum]

HAPPY SCUMDAY PLUMZ

AWWW FATE.

[Friend]

Beefster, what gives you the impression there's more than one player with a post restriction?

[AGar]

My oh my, what have I missed?

Happy scumday, Plum.

Furcolow (who I assume you are Scamp?) I have seen play like this before. As town. As scum, I don't recall playing with him, off site, and NY 114 wasn't really an accurate assessment of his play. He replaced in and then out. I didn't have any real read on him, so meh. Note: If he is not Scamp offsite, this half of the meta is null.

Otherwise, I don't see the scum motivations anymore from him. Yeah, he had one small ping on my radar with the "anyone who pushes a case on me is scum," but other than that I don't see much from him in the way of being scummy. He's been pinned into a corner, and the pressure has been largely unfounded, and I know policy lynch reactions usually end up ugly. His reactions are parallel to what I'd expect a town player with a policy lynch being pushed onto him to do. Ani is just an idiot for his shenanigans with supporting a policy lynch over a couple lost games. Get over it and play this game dammit.

vezok is pinging my scum radar hard right now

Vezok has been a ghost thus far. His 4 posts include a "random vote" on the leading bandwagon, claims that it was a random vote, claimed nothing really happened today after his random vote, attempted directing the vig, but kept his vote on the policy lynch, and tries to meta Furcolow off of a game he replaced out of...

Brilliance.

Really.

Locke Lamora is also giving me some unfavorable vibes. Voting Beefster who "posted for the sake of posting," but the vote looks like a vote for the sake of voting. Then follows up with no actual reads, just "Oh hey. Here's my fence and I'm gonna sit on it for a while, ok?"

[AGar]

Preemie posting fail XD

UNVOTE:
VOTE: vezokpiraka

[Furcolow]

holy mother of god I am so confused. I saw iecerint post this, but i'd like to reiterate on this:
The smell of smoke surrounds animorpherv1 as of post 41...
-A warm light shines on Iecerint as of post 138!

[Furcolow]

zwetchenschweisser, is there a reason you changed your vote? I am voting with this guy. His post restriction implies an awesome role to me.

unvote
vote: beefster

If you have knowledge of someone as scum, unvote beefster and vote them

[Furcolow]

However, I'm assuming that by you using the word "speculation" in connotation with beefster's post, that you are not certain of anyone yet. Where this is a Holy War between Demons and Forces of Light and Everything Good, zwetch has to either be a) extremely bad, or b) extremely good. Like a being heaven-sent, or b being the most unholy of holy orders.