Mini 1037 - Madmen Mafia (Over)

[PieMan]

/confirmsauce

[PieMan]

@screl sorry, I have to talk in long and confusing, and muddling sentences which stretch to the heavens and back.

[PieMan]

What? I cant break my long super huge and complex sentence structure, which is the PR that was assigned to me, or I may face dire consequences that may cause the entirty of excistence to fracture into a million and a half pieces of unknown size and measure.

Also anyone getting any Deja Vu vibes.

[PieMan]

Some people police that arule a little bit harder, but over-all, ive always thought that really its a game, we should all try to be civil people.

[PieMan]

did we just roll up a vote tally before the game even started?

[PieMan]

I was under the impression that the mod would say game on, but either way I guess its time to get rolling.

I think if a jester wins the game continues, I believe theres a rule that says something to that effect.
If a win condition is achieved, and it doesn't directly interfere with the win condition of another faction, the game will keep on.

I would say it could be town, but it still was not maybe in the best intent. I have watched a game with someone who was aggressive and other words that would get me banned from this site, and he was a townie, I personally dont care to play a game with him anytime soon, but it can be used for town purposes.

[PieMan]

Um I think this is just how he plays, I have sources, but due to rules the sources I have are not useable, due to rules of stuff, but im sure if you check his history, you may note this is his normal strat, even though it is horrible, and needs revising, thats my view.

@nopoint could you link a game that you have used a similar strategy, I have heard you have before, and that would prolly show its just your way. (use a game that has finished) As a side note its a horrible strat.

[PieMan]

it is my personal opinion that we should allow the new guy to speak a little, and try to have some more conversation, about something, we seriously have discussed like nothing, but if we dont find anything really, ill gladly vote him off. His play doe seem jesterish, drawing attention to him in a way, that would not be done by a maf, and therefore he is probably a maf. I dont like the fact that he could be playing us, but even with the possibilities of negative reprecussions, we would be getting rid of one person that the maf would be able to use against us later, to force a mislynch.

small version, Im willing to kill him off, I just want to wait a little bit and see what info we can get to pop up.

[PieMan]

VOTE: mysterio

I dont like that concept. If he is being a good townie, hes prolly not the one we should kill.

[PieMan]

Mysterio so let me get this straight, you think its advantageous to kill the people who are not acting like jesters, and who are not being scummy? Thats what your saying right?

[PieMan]

Your going after townie players, it smells of mafia to me.

[PieMan]

I think the big thing nopoint is your an erratic player, and you went with an erratic move, and now we have to discern why in the world it could be made by maf, town, and jester.

its probably why u get killed a lot, though personally after my mind adjusts, i think it may make the games more fun.

[PieMan]

Well we are prolly dealing with 3-2 scum and 2-3 jesters, maybe more.
Id say, unless jesters are scum, that there chances of killing a jester tonight, has decent odds to it.
Plus we probably have at least one vig, and maybe a cop.
So I say we go for the no lynch, I am saying that we dont hammer a no lynch for like a week more, just to try and have a sound idea of people.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: No Lynch

[PieMan]

I was just thinking, why are we no lynching, why are we not just letting the clock run down?, or can we no lynch and then run the clock out? How does that all work?

and by my tally were at l1

[PieMan]

@Katsuki We have a jester team? When did we find this out?

[PieMan]

Jesters voting for nopoint, Id say its entirely possible, but really were not going to get anywhere worrying about jesters all game.

Where does this vig statement come from, I know it was discussed "yesterday" ie game day, but im fairly sure most people would agree we probably do not.

As for a no lynch, I dont know. We seem to have a doctor in our midst, and the longer we go not lynching the more chance the maf will kill the doc.

[PieMan]

VOTE: Percy

I can believe your sane. Theres a few oddities in his play, that dont make complete sense, plus with jokers and maf, a sane cop would make the game more balanced.

[PieMan]

@ gand Why would it say anything about jesters being guilty or innocent in his pm?


@ dr I didnt notice anything on the website saying that they come up as guilty, so unless its a new variant id say they show up as innocent.

[PieMan]

Im not so sure on the bussing, but Ill look back on once my stomach has finally forgiven me for all the pain ive put it through.

VOTE: Percy

[PieMan]

@scorp, just because locke died does not mean screl is the bad guy, it shows probability but its still questionable.

@mysterio what was so wrong with how scorp tried to kill percy day 2?

also there was discussion about the possibility of jesters showing up as guilty, The DR didnt have knowlege of if it was possible, and I know I looked it up on the site and could not find precedence for them showing up as guilty, so the only people who would possibly know, would be the jesters.

@screl what were you looking for with the question about do jesters come up as guilty, the one person who could possibly tell you was dead, and he was not even for sure.

[PieMan]

@mysterio can you tell us what was wrong with scorp trying to hammer percy.

[PieMan]

Percy clearly states in p 329 that he refused to claim.
I can see what your saying about the possibilities of a bus, but it seems that things should have gone differently, in order for it to be a bus. I just dont see how that whole thing was them bussing, I can see how it could be, but I just dont see it as what probably happened.

[PieMan]

it would appear that half the game is not currently here.

[PieMan]

@mysterio What makes you believe Screl is not scum? You have also never said anything bad about him, is there nothing that comes off as wrong to you?

what makes you so sure those two are jesters, it seems counter-intuitive for jesters to sit back and coast, when they need to get themselves killed.

@xscorp I now understand why you hold so much weight for who Locke looked at, I had not realized that he had only commented on Screl.

[PieMan]

@stef could you please give us your opinion on well just whoever, and state your reasoning.

as for your current vote, is it only based on the fact that Katsuki was considering whether a policy lynch on you was a good idea?
Even though I tend to disagree with the ideals of a policy lynch, it is still a held idea on this site.

[PieMan]

Its certainly anti-town behavior, but it is not necessarily scummy behavior. So to me a vote to kill Stef off would seem like a policy vote, instead of a scum vote.

[PieMan]

No if you receded from your normal posting habits, at least one of us would hopefully call you on it. Is this his normal posting habits, or is he playing differently?
Ex Personally I do not like how infrequent and lacking Screl's posts seem to be, but I have played in a game before, and now know that is his style, so personally even though I find his posts lacking, I know to take that with a grain of salt.

@stef Im also expecting an answer to that question, and I expect something that has more than just a simple one liner to it.

[PieMan]

@stef

p152
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 7#p2486747

p398
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 8#p2533108

@katsuki what was his town style of play?

[PieMan]

@katsuki hadnt noticed that was a link to another game.

@stef Do you have anything to say for your apparent lack of posting and content, which is no where near what you appear to do in games?

[PieMan]

VOTE: Stef

are you seriously going to ignore everything people ask you?