Mafia on Holy Orders (Game Over!)

[Locke Lamora]

I'm back, should be catching up and posting by tomorrow.

[zwetschenwasser]

furcolow = fail

[Furcolow]

zwet = evil demon

[Furcolow]

"responsibility" for a hammer?
I honestly don't care about a case sticking to me this game. I am following my gut. I either want zwet dead through this, or a lot of the town to agree it's the best option. I'm trying to roll with the consensus, so if you don't like that, you must be mafia.

[zwetschenwasser]

rolling with consensus for the sake of rolling with consensus = scummy

[pacman281292]

my read on him is townie
i'm sticking by my read
i am not hammering him, unless 3 people in a row tell me they want me to

Why in the world are you trying to get other people to peer pressure you?

You very obviously want to hammer, and you very obviously don't want responsibility for said hammer.

Fate, should we be derailing this wagon?

This.

We're not discussing. Not even scumhunting. Wraith doesn't want even want to defend himself.
I'll ask Fur why does he think Wraith is obvtown. I totally disagree.
And, no need to consensus, Fur. If you are cowardly avoiding responsibility for the hammer, then don't think on hammering. If you think Wraith is town (and I disagree) then don't offer to hammer, because you're contradicting.

That's it. Good bye Wraith. Slammah hammah.

Vote: Wraith.

[Vi]

Mod scene forthcoming. Don't panic.

What do you MEAN I can't delete this post? <.<** ~Vi

[Vi]

Vote Count X

~ At last, the hammer!

Wraith (LYNCH) ~ Iecerint, Socrates, mothrax, vezokpiraka, Friend, zwetchenwasser, Fate, SocioPath, pacman

vezokpiraka (L-5) ~ Plum, AGar, Me=Weird, Wraith
Furcolow (L-7) ~ animorpherv1, Sebguer
Beefster (L-8) ~ Locke Lamora
zwetschenwasser (L-8) ~ Furcolow

Not Voting:

pacman

ani 0 | Seb 0 | AGar 0

--With 17 alive, it will take 9 to lynch.

Battery power:

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

(30%)

----

--- Wraith ---

Righteous

--- Ran Out of MoHO Day 1.

-The remaining battery power was converted!

--- Fate ---

Righteous

--- Corrupted Day 1.

----

Vote Count XI

~ Twisted Fate

Not Voting:

AGar, animorpherv1, Me=Weird,

Fate,

Friend, Furcolow, Iecerint, Locke Lamora, mothrax, pacman281292, Plum, Sebguer, SocioPath, Socrates, vezokpiraka,

Wraith,

zwetschenwasser

-It is now Day 2!

--With 15 alive, it will take 8 to lynch.

---I will check on prods

in the next few minutes

tonight. Prods are now automated; you don't have to request them.

---Have I mentioned in the last few hours how stupid it is that I can't post while my own topic is locked?

Battery power:

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

(100%)

[mothrax]

VOTE: furcolow
his seeking approval strikes me as trying to distance homself from a mislynch.

[pacman281292]

Dang.

Vote: Furcolow.

[Friend]

vote: mothrax

He's still scummy as all hell

[Furcolow]

what the fuck
i said wraith is town
bandwagon me when i was right? he was green dumbasses

[Furcolow]

vote: mothrax

[Friend]

what the fuck
i said wraith is town
bandwagon me when i was right? he was green dumbasses

[Furcolow]

I guess "scum would know he was a townie" would be a good argument, but if you actually read what I said you would see I was saying it was a read.

Mothrax and pacman are likely scum for trying to get an easy mislynch of me on day 2

[Wraith]

Haha

/bah

[Me=Weird]

Fur, yes but you expressed willingness to hammer. Now, I still want a lynch on vezo, but I don't see that happening.

Vote: Furcolow

[mothrax]

Furc I read what you said. Doesnt mean I approve. Willingness to hammer plus seeking town approval even when you had a "town read" is scummy.

[AGar]

Apologies for my absence. I was down with my girlfriend enjoying some time off, then came back and dove into MLG Raleigh stuffs. Now to answer things since I've been gone.

@Mothrax - Hopping back onto a wagon you tried to push when it gains support != buddying. Learn to fucking play.

Oh hey, a Vezo wagon day 1. I have yet to see a game that he is in where this hasn't happened.

Hey, Agar! I KNOW you've played with Vezo before. How is this any different from how he normally plays? And I don't want to hear any "I don't care if he does it every time he is town, it's scummy ANYWAY" bullshit.

I've never seen vezo as scum, he acted like an idiot when he was confirmed town in one game that I replaced into 90 pages in, and in the other [redacted - ongoing game].

So you may be able to meta him, but I have not seen a scum meta, nor am I inclined to build one atm, so I'm going with what I've seen other scum do.

---

Day 2!

Scamp/Furcolow, you're terribad. But probably just idiot town. This isn't TL, and L and Ace aren't here to save your ass buddy.

Mothrax, you're terriworse. With that having no reflection on your probable alignment. However, your behavior says scum. Let's string up you or Vezo (I'm still up for that wagon).

VOTE: Mothrax

[animorpherv1]

vote:Furcolow

I don't remember this being Nightless...

[AGar]

vote:Furcolow

I don't remember this being Nightless...

Did you read the OP? It's a modified Deep South.

Also, are you really going to keep on this Furcolow policy lynching bullshit?

-_-

FoS: animorpherv1

Consider yourself special, I don't use them very often.

[animorpherv1]

Yay, I'm special!

Honestly, I would like to see him lynched, but I'm not going to hound over it.

[pacman281292]

vote:Furcolow

I don't remember this being Nightless...

Did you read the OP? It's a modified Deep South.

Also, are you really going to keep on this Furcolow policy lynching bullshit?

-_-

FoS: animorpherv1

Consider yourself special, I don't use them very often.

We're not policy lynching Furc.
We're lynching him due to his scummy reactions against Wraith's stuff.

[mothrax]

Wow AGar. It's my turn to say rtft! How is my vote on furc policy?

[AGar]

Wow AGar. It's my turn to say rtft! How is my vote on furc policy?

I never said it was. I said Ani's was. So I'll see your rtft and raise you one.

He has not provided any real reasoning for his vote being based off of a case, only flip flopping after initial votes between "It's policy!" and "It's cuz he's scummy." If he has posted a case, I really didn't solidly implant it in my brain because of the flip flopping and the case conveniently building on Furc after his initial policy vote. I've basically viewed any "cases" after his initial vote as a twist of confirmation bias on his part. "I see him as scummy and thus I will vote him. This benefits my position, let me use it."