Succession Mafia (OVER!)

[animorpherv1]

Aim: Abdrius

For being alphabeticaly before me.

[animorpherv1]

Go for it. Can't hurt us, and will hurt scum.

[animorpherv1]

zwet, I was replying to this:

Guys. I have role related information that an only help town.
I know one of the game mechanics the scum use.
I will claim in my next post if I don't see objections. (not a full claim just the mechanic)

[animorpherv1]

woo

Yeah, this.

[animorpherv1]

Hai Furc. I <3 you to.

Also, inHim makes a point. If Seraphim is scum, then vezo is likley town, and Erg0 is likely scum.

Aim:Seraphim

because we all want to see.

[animorpherv1]

I'm up for a Furcolow lynch. Seraphim's replacement can get lynched another time, depending on how everything goes.

Holster, Aim Furcolow

[animorpherv1]

Don't be alarmed guys, Furcolow automatically says that most people voting him are VIs. I've gotten used to it.

Furcolow, I w'm not an idiot. Trying to policy lynch in a game with lots of respectable players = BAD.

[animorpherv1]

I'm going to say this, then stop, because I don't want to break out into an argument.

Furcolow, those times were because you are a VI. This time is because voting someone for the sole reason that they are being replaced out is anti-town.

@zwet: Trust me, your not the only one.

[animorpherv1]

WTF ARE YOU DOING. NO CLAIMING. GEEZ. DID YOU LEARN ANYTHING FROM HARRY POTTER MAFIA?!?!?

Multiple things: You are a terrible player who spams even worse than I do, has bad logic, and derails a thread

I'm sorry, but if playing bad is posting content and getting the game on track, then Andrius is horribl./

[animorpherv1]

I'm sorry, but if playing bad is posting content and getting the game on track, then Andrius is horribl./

Your spelling is horribl./

Yea, that was bad...

Furcolow, not everyone posts 20 times every hour.

Truly, all we are trying to do is help you get better, through whatever means we are using. So, would you lease listen to us every once and a while instead of shoving us off?

[animorpherv1]

@Furc:

Point taken. In relation to some Scummers, I'm not that good. I don't take myself to be one, to the best of my knowledge. I'm not sure how on your other site you play how you fair there. But in relation to MS, your not that great. Everyone has there own playstyle, and I guess that's just yours. However, maybe if you read through the Mafiawiki you may find some interesting points and tips.

The best way to act as a VT, if you are one, is to get the scum to think you are a PR, so they kill you, and not the real PR. Also, constant lynching is mroe of the assault method, as I like to call it. eventually, most people, if policy lynched enough, would figure out that there play is bad, and that they can improve. The next time someone says "Furcolow, don't claim at L-7, take it as constructive critisim, and try not not claim at L-7 again. Generally, L-3 is when you should start thinking about claiming.

[animorpherv1]

EBWOP:

Mafiawiki.

[animorpherv1]

@Furc:

Point taken. In relation to some Scummers, I'm not that good. I don't take myself to be one, to the best of my knowledge. I'm not sure how on your other site you play how you fair there. But in relation to MS, your not that great. Everyone has there own playstyle, and I guess that's just yours. However, maybe if you read through the Mafiawiki you may find some interesting points and tips.

The best way to act as a VT, if you are one, is to get the scum to think you are a PR, so they kill you, and not the real PR. Also, constant lynching is mroe of the assault method, as I like to call it. eventually, most people, if policy lynched enough, would figure out that there play is bad, and that they can improve. The next time someone says "Furcolow, don't claim at L-7, take it as constructive critisim, and try not not claim at L-7 again. Generally, L-3 is when you should start thinking about claiming.

L-3, really? I'd be very iffy about that.

That's just about when you should start thinking about softclaiming. I do recommend claiming at L-1, but when youre at L-3 and several others would gladly vote you, I'd claim then.

[animorpherv1]

@Furc:

Point taken. In relation to some Scummers, I'm not that good. I don't take myself to be one, to the best of my knowledge. I'm not sure how on your other site you play how you fair there. But in relation to MS, your not that great. Everyone has there own playstyle, and I guess that's just yours. However, maybe if you read through the Mafiawiki you may find some interesting points and tips.

The best way to act as a VT, if you are one, is to get the scum to think you are a PR, so they kill you, and not the real PR. Also, constant lynching is mroe of the assault method, as I like to call it. eventually, most people, if policy lynched enough, would figure out that there play is bad, and that they can improve. The next time someone says "Furcolow, don't claim at L-7, take it as constructive critisim, and try not not claim at L-7 again. Generally, L-3 is when you should start thinking about claiming.

L-3, really? I'd be very iffy about that.

That's just about when you should start thinking about claiming. I do recommend claiming at L-1, but when youre at L-3 and several others would gladly vote you, I'd claim then.

EBWOP

[animorpherv1]

I didn't mean to say softclaiming.

[animorpherv1]

The shit underlined is true, you are providing no basis for it being wrong other than your opinion that it is wrong. Your opinion sucks.

This is the thing that will make you lots of enemies. I think this site can reccommend you don't do that often.

[animorpherv1]

I don't think he worded it that strongly.

[animorpherv1]

Ugh....

Friend, less quote, more response please...

[animorpherv1]

@Friend:

That's not a defence. THAT'S A MONSTER.

[animorpherv1]

QUOTE STRIP[ES. MUST DESTROY.

*ATTACKS QUOTE STRIPES W/ NUCLEAR MISSILES*

[animorpherv1]

I hate them too usually but I felt that shitty of a case required it.

NO CASE EVER RQUIRES QUOTE STRIPES.

[animorpherv1]

what case?
and i say this with 100% facetiousness

It might as well be Britney Spears lyrics in Quote Stripes, just hidden under the guise of a case. WE DON'T KNOW.

[animorpherv1]

Four posts does not a scum read make.

[animorpherv1]

Due to this game's amazing* posting rate, I am not doing 'Vote Counts' every new page - I have a job and fiancée to keep, after all, and these are kinda complex to write.

Instead you'll get one when I judge that the situation is sufficiently different - usually that will mean a minimum of 6 hours, or a new vote leader, whichever comes first. I'll do one when I get home, since gandalf is drawing fire.

* Seriously, do you people sign up for my games JUST to break records???

I'd <3 to see if we CAN get over 4000 posts, though..

[animorpherv1]

Hey, is it just me, or has zwet started posting more than four words?

[animorpherv1]

how old is furcolow anyway?

It says 24.

[animorpherv1]

@xvart:

Post 84, I was not lynching Seraphim because he was replacing out. it is a valid reason, IMO.

Post 237, I was telling Furc that you can't decide if someone is scum based on four posts.

[animorpherv1]

Basically I find myself agreeing with Faraday. Chaz's case against Freind is him saying Frind has provided no content. No content =/= Scum.

[animorpherv1]

THAT'S ONLY TO PAGE 8?!?!?!?!?

Geez, we are all in for a massive post.....

@Friend:

It makes sense, if scum canc recruit. If so, then it's something like farside's Zombie mafia. I'll try pulling up the link for you guys.

[animorpherv1]

EBWOP:

Found it. http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=56&t=13512

[animorpherv1]

388 doesn't doa lot for me. I think it's pretty unfair to say he's provided no content, I think saying X is town or Y is scum is content. It's the main thing that matters really. IDK the whole thing seems to be you disagreeing with the way he plays.

No its not. Saying whos scum and town is useless posturing. It doesn't give the town anything, at the very least its a very anti-town way to play. Giving reasons is what pushes the town forward and separates us from other sites where lynches start being random. Making cases, working out who is scum and town by analysis helps us work out who to vote and should influence who we should vote or not vote. By cutting that out we are no longer playing a game of skill and we start playing a game of luck.

Tell that to DGB......

[animorpherv1]

I've decided that Andrius is town with that catch up post. As such, since he gave a fair case on dramonic, and Furcolow is getting better,

Holster, Aim: dramonic

.

Personally, I like a combo of both.


Predit:

EVERYONE STOP NINJAING ME.......

[animorpherv1]

@Andrius. If you link it, I wont read it. Id prefer you to quote.

That's fine, because I didn't hav anything for you in 426 anyway.

@ Ani: Keep buddying to me. It'll make you seem more town.

[animorpherv1]

@Yos:

I understand where your point comes from, but, IME, it's hard to grab a strong scum read from someone that has only posted four times.

[animorpherv1]

there's a difference between "strong scum read" and "scum read"

Yea, there is. That was me fault.

[animorpherv1]

Yos, did you learn ANYTHING from Zombies? It's nice to find the recruitier, but if you found a recruit, stalling the recruiter is good to.

[animorpherv1]

xvart:

Go back, and read my reason. I tohught that that reason was good.

[animorpherv1]

Also, inHim makes a point. If Seraphim is scum, then vezo is likley town, and Erg0 is likely scum.

Aim:Seraphim

because we all want to see.

Mainly between the interactions between all of them.

[animorpherv1]

@ooba:

I've been helpful in town games. Namely, SWN II, when I pay more attention, I can do real well.

[animorpherv1]

I'm going to ignore you Porochaz untill you stop commenting on playstyle. OK?

What Erg0 found is definitley scummy on Furc.

[animorpherv1]

Hey guys, can we lynch Porochaz? Everything pro-town he has done now means nothing since the start of wanting to lynch Friend via playstyle. Voting and commention on Playstyle =/= pro-town.

Holster, Aim:Porochaz

[animorpherv1]

I didn't say anything about playstyle being not antitown, said that commention basically ONLY on playstyle for the [ast few pages is.

[animorpherv1]

Porochaz, I udnerstand you don't like certain playstyles. Noone likes everything/Everyone/verybody. But you don't have to contsantly annoy them about it.

[animorpherv1]

ITT I am playing.

[animorpherv1]

Is this going to turn into another case of "You agreed with someone so your obvioiusly mafia?"

[animorpherv1]

No this is going to turn into a case of 44 of your posts are useless, the one that isn't ironically is the vote against me, which you managed to make a case for all by yourself. In response to that case of yours,

I feel that all there is to talk about in this game is playstyles and that people shouldn't get a free pass for playing rubbish.

If there was anything else significant to talk about I would.

Im going to hold my opinion and hope that in your next 40odd posts, you make a golden post, until then I am going to say your playstyle is scummy and save myself from going to blue in the face by leaving this conversation at this post. In that neither of us are going to budge,

you are going to keep playing the way you are and Im still going to find you infuriating

and I am going to find alternate ways to actually scratch a miniscule amount of anything from you, even if it is by doing the annoying 2 year old thing, of Why? Why? Why? something I shouldn't have to do but there you go...

Bold, I agree with. But playstyle shouldn't be the ONLY factor in your decision.

Italics, I think there is something you can talk about. The rest of us have certainly found something.

Underlined, I am trying to get better. Be it a little bit at a time, or not, but I feel like I am getting better slowly.

[animorpherv1]

For one, the Yos-Friend debate. That definitley should get your opinion.

[animorpherv1]

zwet:

I was only trying to convince Poro because he was pursuing me on playstyle. I have not tried it anywhere else.

[animorpherv1]

That one about discusison points? That was the only one I saw. I answered it.

But TBH, if you can't find something to read in 27 pages, YOU ARE DOING IT WRONG. goo back and read the last 10 pages, and say that there is NOTHING that is scummy/townish at all that you haven;t touched on.

[animorpherv1]

Sure. I'll lynch dramonic unles she claims to have an excellent reason why he's lurking.

Holster, Aim: dramonic

[animorpherv1]

You all sadden me. I'd much rather have the kurker die than someone who will actually be posting content.

[animorpherv1]

I meant lurker.

[animorpherv1]

I meant lurker.

Please answer my questions.

I only saw one. I answered it.

[animorpherv1]

Ah, thanks.

I still stand by my point that if you can't find ANYTHING to talk about in 29 pages, you are doing it wrong, and should do some rereading.

And TBH - You could comment on dramonic vs. Andrius.

[animorpherv1]

FTR, I found another Furcolow scum game.

[animorpherv1]

Honestly, Poro, I try to comment on most of what comes up, so I couldn't really give you a number of what I think are the best, IMO.

[animorpherv1]

Honestly, Poro, I try to comment on most of what comes up, so I couldn't really give you a number of what I think are the best, IMO.

Really? Where.

I'm not sure if this is an insult, a question, or both. But nonetheless, I'm going to answer it.

You've read my ISO, I'm sure. I'm always commenting on things that I can squeeze my opinion into.

[animorpherv1]

@animorpherv1: did you have any analysis of that Furcolow game you linked?

No, but from what I can tell, the players there think he was the exact same as here. Biggest VI ever. Everyone except the mod, that is.

[animorpherv1]

I can attest to the above. I was playing the game, and shot down TL D1 on a gut hunch. Andrius survived 'til lendgame and won.

[animorpherv1]

IMO, dram is scum. We lynch him, and if he is town, we lynch Andrius. Problem solved.

Also, proven role =/= proven alignment.

[animorpherv1]

DERP. Somewhere along the lines, I thought he said he did.

I take back that post.

[animorpherv1]

If we do end up lynching Furc, I call hammer. I've wnated to hammer Furc for a while now.

[animorpherv1]

Not a fan of furc being lynched, he's not town because he's a VI, but I think his VIness has been town in a horribly scummy sort of way so far.

This makes less sense to me than just about every other post in this thread.

[animorpherv1]

Not a fan of furc being lynched, he's not town because he's a VI, but I think his VIness has been town in a horribly scummy sort of way so far.

This makes less sense to me than just about every other post in this thread.

Even

this one?

roflmao

Not that one, but I did say "just about"

[animorpherv1]

happy scumday xvart.

@Faraday:

Mutiple Recruiters in one Faction is possible, but unlikley. Check Zombie mafia (which I linked somewhere in this thread).

[animorpherv1]

Yo guys, day ends in less than a week. I say we just lynch someone and get into Night phase.

[animorpherv1]

Honestly, since we do have multiple recruiters, I wouldn't trust either of their words after today. Probability is higher that they will get recruited ow that they are outted Power Roles. RC lynch is stil la go, though.

holster; Aim: ReaperCharlie

[animorpherv1]

Wow, POSTS HAVE BEEN HERE. Heh. I read through, and I def. Agree with the ooba thing.

Aim:ooba

IMO, ooba is flailing like a flag in the wind.

Also, @ooba:

What makes you so sure that there is no mafia recruiter? IMO, while it may not be likely, is still possible.

[animorpherv1]

Also, @ooba:

What makes you so sure that there is no mafia recruiter? IMO, while it may not be likely, is still possible.

I don't think he said that?

He said that he doesn't think that mafia can't recruit and kill. That is just my interperation of it.

[animorpherv1]

Yo. I'm alive. IMO, opba is still the best lynch.