Mafia on Holy Orders (Game Over!)

[zwetschenwasser]

or creature, you know what I mean.

[Vi]

Mini vote count:
Furcolow (L-4) ~ mothrax, pacman, Me=Weird, animorpherv1
mothrax (L-5) ~ AGar, Friend, zwetschenwasser
pacman (L-7) ~ vezokpiraka
Me=Weird (L-7) ~ Iecerint
vezokpiraka (L-7) ~ SocioPath

Not Voting: Locke Lamora, Plum, Sebguer, Socrates, Furcolow

Official stuff, bells and whistles, etc. to come at regularly scheduled time (three hours from now).

[pacman281292]

@Socio: OK IF YOU WON'T REPLY TO ME THEN I WON'T ASK.
BUT A BAD LYNCH I AM

I'm really tempted to switch my vote to vezokpiraka. He's not even able to explain why did he want to throw the "follow-the-shoutposter" vote. Scummy vote.
Now call me OMGUSer, scums...

[zwetschenwasser]

vezok is playing to town meta.

[Furcolow]

vote: mothrax

don't know if he's mafia, I know my role, and he's the next highest wagon.

[Socrates]

:|

I'm kinda at a loss right now.

vote: Sebguer

mod: Have sebguer or Plum picked up their prods?

The list is obviously activity information. Number of days since last post and number of prods.

[Furcolow]

@socrates why did you change/remove your icon?

[Socrates]

@socrates why did you change/remove your icon?

Its the hip new thing. All the cool kids are doing it!

[Furcolow]

I blame benmage.

[Plum]

Plum didn't even

get

prodded, yo. But she's gonna be reading up &c. in a sec, okay?

[Socrates]

I blame benmage.

Look, if you don't want to be cool by removing you avatar, then you can at least make up for it by voting Sebguer.

[Me=Weird]

Zwet, what experience do you have with vezo? Linkies please.
@avatarless: Case on sebguer, or is it still RVS?
Iecerint, can you please clearly state why you think I'm scum, and in what way, if at all, the recent going-on's have influenced that?
Vezo, you're digging your own grave.
"Vezo: 'pacman is a good vote'
Socio: 'EXCELLENT. EXPLAIN WHY HE IS A GOOD VOTE.'
Vezo: 'Cause he is not a bad vote?'"
Seriously?! He's a good vote because he's not a bad vote, and he's not a bad vote because he's a good vote. Is that what you're trying to say? Because if so, FAIL LOGIC IS FAIL.

Furc, you are admitting to voting someone just because they are the next biggest wagon. You need to die. And then, if there's a vig out there, shoot vezo.

[Iecerint]

I'm voting for you because my biggest second-tier targets were Beefster and Friend, and I think Friend has evidenced more pro-town play in the past several pages than have you. Refer back to my votepost for Beefster for why I thought he was scum.

Also -- and this is peripheral, cuz it's harder to interpret -- I got my shiny light when I was targeting your slot before, so I have relatively good feelings about targeting you. The light could've been due to other things -- maybe someone rapid-investigated me around that time or something -- but the fact that the lights are tied to specific posts makes me think it has something to do with, well, the specific posts. The whole thing could also be a wily scum mechanic, I guess, or sanity-influenced, but ye know.

Yesterday I thought I was being Neighborized into the "warm light" Holy Order or whatever, but I guess I was wrong.

[Iecerint]

I'M POSTING THIS IN A SEPARATE POST SEE HOW HANDY?

Or it could be that the lights are the !!!!!!!! players ways of expressing their views of the game.

[Iecerint]

Or they might be a non-!!!!! player's way of expressing game views.

[Iecerint]

Or it may be investigative!

[Iecerint]

Maybe at least some of them are scum-based?

[Iecerint]

Maybe not the obvious ones?

[Iecerint]

Maybe we should make up a system for letting !!!!!!!!s endore specific combinations of posts...?

For example -- this post means all of the above except for 613.

[Iecerint]

This one excludes 614.

[Furcolow]

Zwet, what experience do you have with vezo? Linkies please.
@avatarless: Case on sebguer, or is it still RVS?
Iecerint, can you please clearly state why you think I'm scum, and in what way, if at all, the recent going-on's have influenced that?
Vezo, you're digging your own grave.
"Vezo: 'pacman is a good vote'
Socio: 'EXCELLENT. EXPLAIN WHY HE IS A GOOD VOTE.'
Vezo: 'Cause he is not a bad vote?'"
Seriously?! He's a good vote because he's not a bad vote, and he's not a bad vote because he's a good vote. Is that what you're trying to say? Because if so, FAIL LOGIC IS FAIL.

Furc, you are admitting to voting someone just because they are the next biggest wagon. You need to die. And then, if there's a vig out there, shoot vezo.

good post, good post, good post,
shit conclusion

likely scum right here

[Furcolow]

ok, so we can write off animorpher as a VI, and pacman is obviously of the same light, so I am considering me=weird and mothrax to be the scum that i felt on my wagon

[Vi]

Vote Count XIII

~ Adventures with your invisible best friend!

Furcolow (L-4) ~ mothrax, pacman, Me=Weird, animorpherv1,

vezokpiraka, zwetschenwasser

mothrax (L-4) ~ Friend,

Furcolow,

AGar, zwetschenwasser, Furcolow

pacman (L-7) ~

SocioPath,

vezokpiraka
Me=Weird (L-7) ~ Iecerint
vezokpiraka (L-7) ~ SocioPath
Sebguer (L-7) ~ Socrates

zwetschenwasser (L-8) ~

Furcolow

Not Voting:

Iecerint,

Locke Lamora, Plum, Sebguer,

SocioPath, Socrates, vezokpiraka, zwetschenwasser, Furcolow

AGar 1 | ani 1 | Me= 0 | Friend 0 | Furc 0 | Iece 0 | Locke 1 | mothrax 1 | pacman 0 | Plum 0 PROD1 1 | Seb -- | Socio 0 | Socrates 1 | vezo 0 | zwet 0

-Somehow the Plum prod never went out. Sebguer definitely hasn't picked up his, and since it has been a week, I'm replacing him.

--With 15 alive, it will take 8 to lynch.

Battery power:

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||

(92%)

[animorpherv1]

@mod:

I never got my prod, either...

Have I mentioned in the last few minutes how much I hate phpBB3? ~Vi

[Furcolow]

I like how 4 relatively smart people are voting mothrax, and how a Village Idiot, a Convict, and two scum are voting me