Mini 1023 - City Watch Mafia - Game Over!

[Narsis]

flavour-wise i can see how drunkenness corresponds to daycop, although i dont think it's overly important.

as for the Vimes claim...i'm inclined to believe VV. first, there hasnt been a counterclaim, although i wouldn't expect scum to pull that kind of gambit to just get a cc. secondly, why would scum get a daycop ability? perhaps they have a different ability, but even then how would it benefit scum? maybe a DV kind of power, but then wouldnt it be obvious he was lying if he actually used it to get a lynch? dayvig has a similar limitation, and beyond those two i cant really think of a daypower that could benefit scum. maybe a dayprotect?(preventing the lynch of a person) but that seems a bit overpowered, especially if scum got it.

anyway i'm at the very least interested in the result VV will get of whoever he investigates.

as for who i would investigate...probably Tasky simply because my reads on him are all over the place. even so i would be supportive of any investigation.

Another "No change" VOTE COUNT

Chronopie (4): Narsis, Thor665, Budja, Tasky
FakeGod (3): VasudeVa, jimfinn, Chronopie
VasudeVa (1): TheButtonmen

Not Voting (2): FakeGod, Plum

With 10 alive, 6 votes are needed to lynch.

[VasudeVa]

Explain to me what your trying to get at with this post cause I honestly don't understand.

EBWOPS indicate panic(or something else but hey, whatever. I can live with confirmation bias when I'm right.). You panicked in that game. You were scum in that game. Therefore, you are scum in this game.

You thought he was so obvscum that investigating him would have been a waste, surely it can't be that hard to make a case agianst him?

I did.. T'is short and sweet. Just how I like 'em.

[VasudeVa]

I have sent it. I investigated Tasky. If he turns out innocent, we lynch FG then BM then find the third scum. If he's guilty, we can lynch FG, BM and Tasky in any order and win the game.

[TheButtonmen]

You thought he was so obvscum that investigating him would have been a waste, surely it can't be that hard to make a case agianst him?

I did.. T'is short and sweet. Just how I like 'em.

Once agian I'm going to be quoting the post VV linked for everyone.

eh VV, it's cool if you don't believe me. But I was just being honest.

O well, Cheers.

Is there like, a tool somewhere here to ignore obvscum posts?

I'm not even gonna investigate you, so shut it. We lynch you after I get my guilty. There is absolutely no town reason to make a large wall post for my lynch like that when you claim to have seen my breadcrumb.

Great case.

Explain to me what your trying to get at with this post cause I honestly don't understand.

EBWOPS indicate panic(or something else but hey, whatever. I can live with confirmation bias when I'm right.). You panicked in that game. You were scum in that game. Therefore, you are scum in this game.

How many EBWOP's did I make in that game then?

I love how for all this flailing your doing.

[VasudeVa]

1. I know right. Oh, wait was that sarcasm?
If sarcasm: Why?
If not sarcasm: *Virtual Fist Pump!*
2. None, but hey panic has many faces.

This political smear campaign you are doing is just horrible. You are nit-picking my words and choosing the most vague ones and then giving a bad interpretation. I know I may not be the best expressor of what I'm doing but I'm generating a fuckload of content and catching scum, whatever you're doing is a horrible unprecedented tunnel on me.

Are you scum tempday-godfather or something?

[TheButtonmen]

You are nit-picking my words and choosing the most vague ones and then giving a bad interpretation.

Link?

I'm generating a fuckload of content

Link?

catching

bussing scum

FTFY, Your statment about how you were going to get a guilty before you even chose a target made me lol.

whatever you're doing is a horrible unprecedented tunnel on me.

Are you scum tempday-godfather or something?

Aw does me not believing your fake claim make you sad?

[VasudeVa]

Amazing. You ignored my questions. Tell me why I should not extend to you the same courtesy?

[TheButtonmen]

Your question was asking me if I'm the scum temp godfather, for what it's worth I deny that.

Now please answer mine.

[VasudeVa]

1. I know right. Oh, wait was that sarcasm?

If sarcasm: Why?

If not sarcasm: *Virtual Fist Pump!*
2. None, but hey panic has many faces.

Obviously, the question you are referring to that I did not answer is not a serious question.

[TheButtonmen]

Your Case (the one explaining why FG is so obvscum that investigating him is a laughable waste of a one shot):

Is there like, a tool somewhere here to ignore obvscum posts?

I'm not even gonna investigate you, so shut it. We lynch you after I get my guilty. There is absolutely no town reason to make a large wall post for my lynch like that when you claim to have seen my breadcrumb.

First off I'm really digging how you know your getting a guilty before you even know who your investigating, secondly there is a town reason for making long winded some what weak attacks on you after seeing your bread crumb (to see how your respond, to give cover, to distract attention ect) and thirdly that's not a case.

Now please answer mine.

[VasudeVa]

I'm digging this 'how you respond' thing you came up with. Why is it so hard to think that I might be trying the same?

Furthermore, FakeGod exerted a lot of effort to try to get me lynched when he apparently saw my breadcrumb.
So what you're saying is, this is a logical Townie thing to do:
Townie: I saw Vas' breadcrumb! I must make a massive mega post to get him lynched so that scum won't catch on to it!

It is a case. Case don't have to be massive mega walls of analysis. It can be short and sweet as I did. What makes you say that it was not a case?

Also, don't you think by quoting specific parts of my explanations and then asking 'link?' it's nitpicking? I think you've answered your own question.

FTFY, Your statment about how you were going to get a guilty before you even chose a target made me lol.

In this statement, it seems like you believe my 'fake claim'. *snicker*

Please die.

[VasudeVa]

EBWOP: 'I'm digging this 'to see how you respond' etc. etc.

[TheButtonmen]

Also, don't you think by quoting specific parts of my explanations and then asking 'link?' it's nitpicking? I think you've answered your own question.

No, I'm asking you to back what your saying up. That's not nit picking at all.

FTFY, Your statment about how you were going to get a guilty before you even chose a target made me lol.

In this statement, it seems like you believe my 'fake claim'. *snicker*

Please die.

Since you apprently don't understand what I'm saying I'll be blunt.

Your scum.

Your trying to get confirmed(ish) as town by claiming Daycop and "proving" it.

You know you need to get a guilty for maximum effect and thus you refuse to investigate me or FakeGod (Your top scum reads) and instead are bussing a partner (hence premtivly knowing your going to get a guilty).

Now please answer my questions?

[VasudeVa]

I met a guy today with a wooden leg named Fred.

[TheButtonmen]

Right.

Thanks for giving away your partners though.

[VasudeVa]

Who? Fred?

[TheButtonmen]

Chrono and Trasky.

[Thor665]

Hell, I'm not even sure why Drunkenness = Daycop.

*cough*everything looks clearer through the bottom of the glass*cough*
I was pretty much certain Vimes would be a single shot cop of some variety due to the flavor.

@VV
@TBM

Egads, zip it, I think we know where you both stand. I don't need to read an entire page of 'no, u!' to get taht you don't trust each other.

I believe VV.
I'm 'meh' on the Tasky pick, but, hell, I was conflicted on my Tasky read as well, so c'est la vie.
I think FakeGod looks bad for reasons VV has noted, and would love it if he would address them.
I'm really conflicted on TBM, I understand his doubts, I don't understand being so intense about a player who just claimed Day Cop.
Plum is town (or is just a better player then all these anti-town players we're stuck with, but I prefer looking on the bright side)

[VasudeVa]

Guilty result. Speed lynch, nao.

[VasudeVa]

Vote: Tasky

[Narsis]

Unvote

Vote: Tasky

also i'm not necessarily in favour of a speed lynch. i'd like to at the very least hear what he and others have to say.

[Plum]

Guilty result. Speed lynch, nao.

VOTE: Tasky

Fistpump.

Though I don't object to Tasky saying anything he likes.

VV, you're sure you're sane, right?

[TheButtonmen]

I'm really conflicted on TBM, I understand his doubts, I don't understand being so intense about a player who just claimed Day Cop.

-shrug-

When I see something that to me seems super scummy start trying to lead town I start playing a lot more aggressively in an attempt to show the rest of the town the issues I see before their way of thinking is changed.

In this case I wanted to stop anyone from treating him as confirmed town for what seems like blatant bussing.

Guilty result. Speed lynch, nao.

Shocking.

Unvote; Vote: Trasky

[Plum]

Whatever. If this lynch pans out as it should there are some interesting implications beyond VV/TBM.

[VasudeVa]

That won't save you from your D3 lynch, Buttonmen~. You'll have to nightkill me tonight if you have any hope of surviving mah RAAGEE.

@Plum: Nope. Pretty generic 'You get a guilty or not guilty' PM + the 'this only lasts for Day two' stuff. *Fist Pump*