Mafia on Holy Orders (Game Over!)

[curiouskarmadog]

it was more of a knock on Friend...but ok, I get your point

[Vi]

Vote Count XIX

~ Budgetary constraints mean no new vote count gimmick

pacman (L-4) ~ Plum, Socrates, vezokpiraka, SocioPath

Furcolow (L-5) ~ mothrax, pacman, Chronopie
mothrax (L-5) ~ AGar, Friend, curiouskarmadog
Me=Weird (L-7) ~ Locke Lamora
Plum (L-7) ~ zwetschenwasser
vezokpiraka (L-7) ~ Iecerint

Not Voting:

curiouskarmadog,

Me=Weird, Furcolow

AGar 0 | Chronopie 3 PROD1 0 | Me= 1 | Friend 0 | Furc 0 | Iece 0 | Locke 1 | mothrax 0 | pacman 0 | Plum 1 PROD1 7 | ckd 0 | Socio 1 | Socrates 1 | vezo 2 | zwet 2

-Chronopie is being prodded...

--With 15 alive, it will take 8 to lynch.

---Ugh, that size=1 line looks hideous now that I'm using a browser that can see it at all. More reason for all of you to switch to Firefox :fascism:

Battery power:

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

||||

|

(50%)

[Iecerint]

Unvote; Vote: mothrax

I guess.

[Furcolow]

@AGar: I don't disagree with your case; it makes totally sense. What I hate about your posts is when you start getting offensive with them.

i'm voting pacman for this post and response to agar

vote: pacman

[Friend]

What about that post is scummy, Furc? What makes it scummier than, say, anything mothrax has done?

[pacman281292]

What about that post is scummy, Furc?

[Furcolow]

1) misuse of words
2) disapproval of ad hom
3) active lurking

[Furcolow]

i guess 2 is null sometimes, because i get offended on personal issues as well as town the more i think about it

[Friend]

How in the world has pacman been active lurking?

[Furcolow]

his last 3 posts have been responding to the post right in front of it

[Furcolow]

he's either actively lurking, or not reading

[pacman281292]

1) misuse of words
2) disapproval of ad hom
3) active lurking

1) Why misuse of words?
2) What the hell is this?
3) Hypocrisy much?

Well, I tried to reply to Plum's case. She wasn't satisfied. So, I wasn't sure on what to say from there on.
The case on mothrax does make sense. I tried to give in some points there (not sure this is the right wording), but then decided against because stuff was already spoken. So I answered other stuff.
I also decided to not to bother about CKD's try, because I did think it would fail. I found what I was going to say already spoken in-thread so much times, I just decided to let it go.
You have been active lurking even worse, Furc. Don't come up with hypocrisy there, scum.

[Furcolow]

I don't actively lurk. I am the most prolific poster within this thread hands down.

I am not satisfied with any of your responses, either, and you are not making sense if you're town. What does the case on mothrax have to do with the case on you? are you saying you know mothrax's alignment?

ad hom is a shortened version of a term for slander/baseless attacks which generally contain many cusswords
attacking the person instead of their argument

no, it is not hypocritical
i do not actively lurk
i spam, if anything

and don't call me scum, when you are the one who is more likely mafia

[Chronopie]

Going to be semi-V/LA over the next week, have a group presentation to work on. posting this across all games.

(Sorry about the V/LA so soon after I replaced in Vi)

[AGar]

1) misuse of words
2) disapproval of ad hom
3) active lurking

I smell a contradiction.

Oh, you caught yourself.

But how about this one?

And stop with your filthy, filthy lies.

[vezokpiraka]

I was away.
Back expect reread.

[zwetschenwasser]

Furc, you active lurk. Deal with it. Pacman has scum on his wagon.

[Friend]

pacman (L-4) ~ Plum, Socrates, vezokpiraka, SocioPath

Give 'em to me.

[zwetschenwasser]

Cool

[Friend]

You can't say "Pacman has scum on his wagon" and then not name names.

[Furcolow]

ok, well, i'm happy with a couple wagons rolling
and i still dont believe i actively lurk
i always post when i get on
plus it's good to pressure people the way ive been pressuring pacman for town imo

[Friend]

The way you've been pressuring pacman?

[AGar]

pacman (L-4) ~ Plum, Socrates, vezokpiraka, SocioPath

Give 'em to me.

I already have - vezok.

Vezok and mothrax, both uberly scummy. Both deserving of lynching. Get mothrax first, then kill vezok. Or vezok first then Mothrax. Your call.

[Friend]

I was talking to zwet, but whatever.

Mothrax needs to go before vezo. I wouldn't mind seeing vezo eat some rope, though.

[AGar]

I was talking to zwet, but whatever.

Mothrax needs to go before vezo. I wouldn't mind seeing vezo eat some rope, though.

Yeah but 3 hours ago all he said was "cool."

I figured I'd point that out anyways.

And I'm fine with Moth first. Just want something to happen, honestly.