VasudeVa wrote:I liked
his reaction to the beginning of my gambit(me asking Vimes to claim), and his reaction to my claim and his request to
daycop Tasky, to be more precise.
Hmmm. They're decent though not unambiguous points, especially given that Narsis' reasons for requesting the daycop on Tasky were basically the same ones I'd given when I said I wanted a Tasky daycop, and he'd expressed relatively little read on Tasky either way throughout the whole game. My STUFF is that Tasky did one thing weird Day 1 which was un . . . oh, never mind, it probably
was
to blatant buddying, for Tasky to have attacked the Narsis wagon so hard? I suppose. Hm, never mind (somehow in my mind it got transposed, so I remembered it as a more of a chainsaw defense. It wasn't, it really was an attack on all the Narsis attackers . . .)
VasudeVa wrote:Chronopie is Town then.
I'll hazard a probably there . . . I've seen scum pull some weird gambits on the fly with no daytalk whatsoever (gambits where people were like 'Do scum have daytalk, because if not Player X can't possibly be scum' when she was).
I'm still not really sure about TBM thar.
jimfinn wrote:Dorfl could be a safeclaim if not counterclaimed, don't let the claim get him off the hook.
Dorfl is publicly confirmed to be in the game. Dorfl is pro-City Watch in the books, as far as I can recall/determine via Wikipedia (I
did
read
Feet of Clay
, just a long time ago). Chrysoprase, scum-Tasky's character, was not (again as far as I can tell). While this isn't entirely conclusive evidence, Dorfl is almost certainly a role in the game and not a safeclaim, and Dorfl is very likely to be a Town role. I am disheartened to see you trying to cast doubt on this and find myself slightly suspicious of you.
For the benefit of VV:
Not On My 'Feel Town' List:
TheButtonmen
Budja
jimfinn
Chronopie??????