Open 245 - Mini Love - Scum win!


User avatar
WingsOWisdom
WingsOWisdom
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
WingsOWisdom
Goon
Goon
Posts: 109
Joined: January 3, 2008

Post Post #9 (isolation #0) » Mon Sep 06, 2010 12:49 pm

Post by WingsOWisdom »

/confirm
User avatar
WingsOWisdom
WingsOWisdom
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
WingsOWisdom
Goon
Goon
Posts: 109
Joined: January 3, 2008

Post Post #19 (isolation #1) » Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:51 pm

Post by WingsOWisdom »

VOTE: Tasky
Your avatar creeps me out.
User avatar
WingsOWisdom
WingsOWisdom
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
WingsOWisdom
Goon
Goon
Posts: 109
Joined: January 3, 2008

Post Post #44 (isolation #2) » Thu Sep 09, 2010 3:31 pm

Post by WingsOWisdom »

quadz08 wrote:I'm gonna kickstart the game a bit, and toss in some RQS.

1. Lynch all lurkers?
2. Lynch all liars?
3. RQS or RVS and why?
4. Favorite previous game?
1. Pressure? Yes. Policy lynch? No.
2. Same
3. Never played with RQS before.
4. The resume's thin (appears to be a common trend), but I liked Mini 932
User avatar
WingsOWisdom
WingsOWisdom
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
WingsOWisdom
Goon
Goon
Posts: 109
Joined: January 3, 2008

Post Post #64 (isolation #3) » Fri Sep 10, 2010 5:32 pm

Post by WingsOWisdom »

Mokujin_ wrote:Quad's Q's only sparked discussion of his Q's usefulness. All in all, RQS only has any usefulness because there isn't a consensus on its validity. The questions themselves are irrelevant. And in the end, Day 1 will slump because of the RQS. RVS creates more content.
Unless you've got some examples, that's purely speculation. Day 1 will only slump if we let it slump.
andrew94 wrote:u said your vote was serious. now your saying ur vote is an rvs?
I don't know where you're getting that impression. "RVS creates more content" != "My vote is random"
User avatar
WingsOWisdom
WingsOWisdom
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
WingsOWisdom
Goon
Goon
Posts: 109
Joined: January 3, 2008

Post Post #147 (isolation #4) » Mon Sep 13, 2010 6:07 pm

Post by WingsOWisdom »

All this arguing is making my head hurt. Anyone that wants to be replaced shouldn't be pressured into staying; it's no fun to be in a game that you're not enjoying.

Personally, I'm trying to sort through everything and figure out what is personality clash and what is opportunistic scum.
User avatar
WingsOWisdom
WingsOWisdom
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
WingsOWisdom
Goon
Goon
Posts: 109
Joined: January 3, 2008

Post Post #323 (isolation #5) » Tue Sep 21, 2010 8:00 pm

Post by WingsOWisdom »

Oh, hey, this game.

Zed's not unvoting andrew after his claim (she posted while he was at L-1) in 188 and disbelief of his claim in 204 are at least consistent with her later counter claim, so I'm inclined to believe her. Her reluctance to vote for him, while puzzling to me, mostly confirms this, as she's had two opportunities to hammer him now, and I can't imagine scum passing up the opportunity to lynch a claimed doctor.

So, hammer time. UNVOTE: VOTE: andrew94

I thought about waiting for a replacement for andrew, but don_johnson is right. Unless andrew's replacement acts even scummier, I doubt anyone will change their minds about this lynch (that is, andrew's replacement might convince people to vote FOR him, but I don't think anyone currently voting for him will be persuaded to unvote). I'd rather not give potential scum andrew's replacement the opportunity to mess with our perception of connections to scum buddies.

Also, this.
ZeroFang wrote:Leaving the scum to choose is a bad idea.
Also also, gut says Tasky is scum for trying to keep andrew alive today.
User avatar
WingsOWisdom
WingsOWisdom
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
WingsOWisdom
Goon
Goon
Posts: 109
Joined: January 3, 2008

Post Post #358 (isolation #6) » Thu Sep 30, 2010 4:21 pm

Post by WingsOWisdom »

Sorry for disappearing. Catch-up/re-read tomorrow evening, and I should be more active after that.

Return to “Completed Open Games”