Mini 1056 - NFL Mafia (Game Over)

[GhostWriter]

/confirmed first.

[GhostWriter]

Tis a name, not a word. A pen name, to be exact.

OMGUS VOTE: Jim for making false assumptions.

[GhostWriter]

I agree with the vote on Mongoose, but I disagree with your stance on Kdub. I don't much like or understand townreads based on 2 or 3 posts during the RVS.

[GhostWriter]

Not to mention the whole "and the rest of his post was also pretty good" bit.

[GhostWriter]

My condolences, Jason. I wish you the best.

[GhostWriter]

Coach travis says my post was bad and suspicious, but doesnt really explain

Polly wanna cracker?

right after he agrees with my post.

I don't see it.

He also says anti hero is town because his post was good. Again, no explanation.

I totally referenced that, Polly.

He also hasn't made any serious posts outside of this one.

And hes a Raiders fan.

Pot calling kettle black, plus a little extra pointless joke to attempt to lighten up the post right after having talked about someone not having serious posts. Lovely.

I didn't like his post, and I'm still decided whether I like your post even less or not. I probably will.

[GhostWriter]

That wasn't the only problem with the post. Don't pick one thing you can counter and ignore the rest. And there you go again with calling the kettle black.

[GhostWriter]

What didn't I counter? You mentioned twice I Copied what you said, which I responded to. I admitted to not posting much in the first paragraph of my original post, so you can't really complain about not responding to that. Read the first line of what he says, saying he doesn't agree with policy lynches, which is pretty much what I said. Anything else?

Pretty much what you said? All you said was:

Are you one of them? jk. I dont see what the whole "policy" fuss is about at all.

And that doesn't sound at all like someone disagreeing with policy lynches. Like, at all. And as for admitting to not posting much, if that's the case then stop trying to drop "CT hasn't posted much" so much. Shifting the attention to his lack of posting and away from your own. And you can't even really mention the most recent posts, because they come as direct responses to me. Between the copying you did in that original post, the fact that you never really said anything close to what he said on policy lynching, and the fact that your own lack of content kind of makes me wary of the fact that you pointed to his, I think I'm fine with the following: VOTE: Mongoose.

[GhostWriter]

HOLY SHIT GUYS!!!
I was joking and just saying that I hate playing with a missing player, because if he is scum then he slips under the radar and we won't lynch him.
Also @ Raj, you just said "I've been trying not to OMGUS you because that would make me look to scummy, but now that I can justify it by post nothing again, and even more fluff I will OMGUS you and maybe people won't figure out I'm scum"
I LOVE my vote.
And @ Jim finn- STFU and unvote me you make no sense, you just seem like opportunistic scum right now and if I didn't know your meta I would vote you

This I agree with. Both of those votes look absolutely pathetic.

[GhostWriter]

As far as I'm concerned, all I heard was that if one flips scum, I'm not trusting the other. Is it because they buddied like that? Nope. I'd have been fine with the way inHim explained things. But Raj's explanation leaves me with a bad taste in my mouth.

PREVIEW EDIT: Why do you say they would lead the town? And you say it like they would be replacing you. I wasn't aware that you were leading the town.

[GhostWriter]

Welp, that previous post couldn't have been aimed at me.

Also, you never answered me.

[GhostWriter]

Policy lynching never comes before the lynching of scummy players. Hands down. Not in any game I play in. Not when I have a say so in what's going on. It's just that, now, if you both seem scummy, you're easy to link together.

[GhostWriter]

It's a bloody nulltell. Let's move past it.

[GhostWriter]

Then the proper phrase would have been "may not want the pressure of being a PR", not naming a specific role.

Also, I agree that the buddying theoretical discussion can be dropped. It's being used as a way of talking in circles while seeming to go forward.

[GhostWriter]

So he's like Mongoose, but he's not Mongoose, making you fine with voting him?

I understand seeing him as scummy. As my previous post mentioned, I don't like the discussion he so willingly just threw himself into. However, that vote essentially says what my first line in this post says.

[GhostWriter]

So he's like Mongoose, but he's not Mongoose, making you fine with voting him?

I understand seeing him as scummy. As my previous post mentioned, I don't like the discussion he so willingly just threw himself into. However, that vote essentially says what my first line in this post says.

They're both doing the same thing. Everyone is focusing on mongoose and ignoring jim. Jim needs a little pressure, too. Does it upset you that he is no longer flying under the radar?

Oh, that's fun, let's point fingers at people and imply them as scum. I could do that, and say something along the lines of "does it upset you that Mongoose is getting such a huge bandwagon". But that's rather pointless, isn't it? I think so. Why would I dislike the fact that someone has been called out? Like I thought I implied before, I understand seeing him as scummy, and don't mind that you've pointed him out. But that doesn't change the way that post came across. And I stated how that post came across. Aggressive much?

[GhostWriter]

But I wasn't being aggressive. Seems we aren't very good readers of posts that the other makes.

My problem with your original post wasn't that you pointed out Jim. It was that you point out Jim for reasons similar to Mongoose, who has a wagon and could surely use another vote, and then didn't supply that vote to the Mongoose wagon. I don't feel like Mongoose is taking the votes serious and might need to feel more pressure.

Then again, I don't actually know the vote count.

[GhostWriter]

God dammit...

[GhostWriter]

I think you misinterpreted that "God dammit".

[GhostWriter]

Dammit, I'm upset at the breadcrumbing.

[GhostWriter]

Allow me to elaborate:

I do not actually think you have an investigative role. However, that post was very well written, up until that point. In the future, just leave that part out.

[GhostWriter]

I'm actually fine with Jim for now though. I cannot wait to she him live up to this.

[GhostWriter]

I'm actually fine with Jim for now though. I cannot wait to she him live up to this.

That should be "see", not "she"...

[GhostWriter]

It really is. Tell me, where do you think my vote is?

[GhostWriter]

Wait a second, hold up there. Why the hell is my vote there?

Mod: I never voted Jim. My vote never left Mongoose.

[GhostWriter]

So he's like Mongoose, but he's not Mongoose, making you fine with voting him?

I understand seeing him as scummy. As my previous post mentioned, I don't like the discussion he so willingly just threw himself into. However, that vote essentially says what my first line in this post says.

They're both doing the same thing. Everyone is focusing on mongoose and ignoring jim. Jim needs a little pressure, too. Does it upset you that he is no longer flying under the radar?

Oh, that's fun, let's point fingers at people and imply them as scum. I could do that, and say something along the lines of "does it upset you that Mongoose is getting such a huge bandwagon". But that's rather pointless, isn't it? I think so.

Uh... isn't that what you just did?

Unvote, Vote: Ghostwriter

What, pray tell, did I do?

[GhostWriter]

Mari/Locke:
I think you misunderstood my post. I am saying that GW/Mari thought jim was breadcrumbing *having an investigative role that he would use on N1* (which obviously he doesn't so the point shouldn't even have been made), not that he already had a result..

Speaking of misunderstandings...

You do understand that I specifically said that I did NOT think that? Like, said it in the very next post, I think. Or close to it. My problem was with how close it comes to breadcrumbing. Not that it was breadcrumbing. Thus why I specifically said that I needed to clarify that I didn't think he actually had such a role.

i do want to say that there is a Ghost-antihero connection that makes me feel uneasy. but it might just be analogous to mine and inhims relationship. but other than that connection i find both of them pro town.

What connection?

[GhostWriter]

Oh bloody hell, really? Of course this happens... Bah.

[GhostWriter]

Why the hell was I even killed?

[GhostWriter]

Sort of like Peter Wiggin from the Ender's Shadow storyline...

[GhostWriter]

Well, if there are authors worth emulating, Card is certainly high on the list.