OK. Going back for my posts, I only found this:
pacman281292 wrote:Me=Weird wrote:lol at the hypocrisy in furcs 1248 post.
Friend:
You voted me for voting furc, b/c we disagree about whether he's VI-scum or VI-town. Y/N?
You said the way I've been presenting myself about thinking he's VI-scum is scummy. Y/N?
I asked why the way I've been presenting it is scummy. Y/N?
Instead of answering, you said my case on mothrax was scummy too, for the following reasons:
I basically paid no attention to him for a while(I was trying to get my first suspect lynched).
I focused on VI-type "easy targets" instead(It's called voting my top suspects, and they were, regardless of how much of an "easy target" they were).
I made a IIoA case on him later(How would we lynch if everybody joined wagons quicker? And how is it IIoA? If it was, why did you ignore up until now? You got plenty of posts in after my case and before the lynch). Y/N? Most importantly, why did you deflect my question?
FoS: Friend
Many of these questions are actually loaded questions, or rhetorical questions. While Friend's dodginess and "furc is town by meta blah blah blah" is unhelpful for the town as well as confusing, this post is very poor.
FoS: M=W.
This post was the one which struck out the most to me. Explanation already there.
However, in second thought, many of the posts I considered initially scummy weren't such, actually. However, his lurking isn't helping either.
Furthermore, upon reading Beefster the only things I could find were that he was active lurking (maybe overwhelmed by activity?), plus that he had tunneled Locke.
WTH.
Unvote.
Gah, my head is now confused. New vote coming up tonight.
