Same thing I said I'd say: I was wrong. Let's move on. If you feel there was an anti-town motivation behind my push, analyze it. But sorry that I think players who act on "gut" are crocks.curiouskarmadog wrote:lol, M=W was lynched??...mother fucker....cant wait to hear what Agar and pac have to say today.
This post, this is called an "oh, shit!" post. This is the post of scum who false-claims to buy themselves some time, then doesn't think it all the way through and has no contingency plan.Haylen wrote:You'll notice that some of these letters are in the colours of the rainbow. Ignore the ones that aren't, they were used as red herrings to prevent scum from killing off my target just in case.Haylen wrote:I think we should lynched M=W today, for thereasons that have already been stated. I am seriously pissed that he didn't want me to use my track, it's not oftenthat I get to have any sort of ability in a game. I would also like to know why Iec was so interested in discussing the post in whichIgot told I had my ability, I was also like to know how,clearly, Iecerint knows that the scum give abilities.
What letters you have left, you need to put them in rainbow order to find the name of the person I targetted.
I
E
C
E
R
I
N
T
Iecerint.
I targetting Iecerint because I was getting some very odd vibes from him that I couldn't put my finger on - like I did with Ojanen in Ladies Mafia. I also believed it was feasible that he would gather a lot of heat rather soon in the game. Thus is my rationale behind my action target.
I did received "no result", so I conclude that either Iecerint has a hiding ability or there is a roleblocker in the game. If that player is scum, then I was obviously targetted because of my tracking ability and not killed because that would be stupid as I could still be lynched. If that player is town then they will receive a rather pissed off response from me after the game. If that player I town, I will not ask them to make themselves known, just...don't do it again. That was a one shot.
Haylen is scum, and the claim was a crock to get her through a day. See the light people, SEE IT.
VOTE: Haylen
Hmm. She's now claiming to have seen Iec go to Furc.
I still don't buy it. The story seems all too convenient.
Haylen "I got no result. I may have been blocked or Iec might have a hider ability"
Iec "I went to someone"
Haylen "Oh wait, I think I got a result! Was it furc?"
Note how she never says with CERTAINTY that it was Furc. She asks, like she's taking a stab in the dark.
Now, she's grasping at straws saying "It had to be this person who sent the message!"
Let's think:
If she says that only two people call her that nickname, and neither of those two people are in this game, what benefit does the person get from using a butchered half of that nickname - that isn't obvious as a nickname, and can be taken in a connotation in a completely different direction - in a message to SOMEONE ELSE? Too much room for error, I think. Too much grasping at remote possibilities to try and justify this lie, keep the aura alive.