You. Have. No. Life.Katsuki wrote:effing terrible mod and game...
/confirm
Disclosure: I have never heard of this book/movie before
Vote: Andrius
/confirm
You. Have. No. Life.Katsuki wrote:effing terrible mod and game...
/confirm
Disclosure: I have never heard of this book/movie before
Vote: Andrius
Do you mean posted without addressing it? Well it looks like everybody's guilty of that. I think it was a good idea that didn't have any chance of sucess with all the bickering between pacman and thor.RedCoyote wrote:Wingless 54 wrote:Why wouldn't we go out of RVS?This was a good idea, did you just think of it when you posted this?Kat 59 wrote:Oh hey guys, mafia get daytalk until 5pm PST. Let's stop posting until then shall we?
Also, do you think FC and Bub are slightly more suspicious because they ignored your request without addressing it?
@FakeGod: Why would you want to do that?FakeGod wrote:ok coolunvote
I'll put my vote on the highest wagon after Andy gives us a VC.
Hi, Thor! Fancy seeing you here.
Because of the way Pacman and you went out there in such a way as to draw attention to yourself. For a couple of pages, you were the sole attraction of the town. That is not a place scum want to be.Thor665 wrote:@Bub - you said you read Pacman/Thor as townie vs. townie - why?
Do you mean "@Bub"? It's got two "b's" in it, you know.Thor665 wrote:EBWOP - the above is @Bud
How's this for being "out there":thor wrote:How do you think pacman initiated/elongated the situation of being "out there"?
His head freakin' asploded. That draws attention to one's self, scum don't like to do that.pacman 43 wrote:head asplodes*
This is a circular reasoning. I make a second random vote, then you vote me by saying that it wasn't random because I said it was random? When my intentions were making a random vote?
I don't know how, but you WIFOMed yourself. Good job.
My vote, as you said, was totally random. Is there any particular reason (preferably other than that circular reasoning) to think that?
Far_Cry wrote:UNVOTE: Exilon. I need a little time to go over Exilon's posts. And I need to look at RC.
Ok, this makes sense. Only stupid scum would try to draw so much attention to themselves. My read on pacman and thor is similar to yours: town vs. town.Bub Bidderskins wrote:Because of the way Pacman and you went out there in such a way as to draw attention to yourself. For a couple of pages, you were the sole attraction of the town. That is not a place scum want to be.
It being my read is imaterial. The point is that you simply said "I agree" and left without adding anything useful or hinting at the fact that you would add something useful in the future. Now you've had two posts to explain why you think that Pacman and Thor are townies. Explain, in your own words.Far_Cry wrote:This is horrible. This is quite a scummy vote against me. What you're saying is: "Far_Cry, how dare you try to buddy with me?" Scum tries to avoid connections with people.Bub Bidderskins wrote:Far_Cry wrote:UNVOTE: Exilon. I need a little time to go over Exilon's posts. And I need to look at RC.
Ok, this makes sense. Only stupid scum would try to draw so much attention to themselves. My read on pacman and thor is similar to yours: town vs. town.Bub Bidderskins wrote:Because of the way Pacman and you went out there in such a way as to draw attention to yourself. For a couple of pages, you were the sole attraction of the town. That is not a place scum want to be.Vote: Far_Cry
Do you normally like to piggy-back on other people's reads without adding anything usefull?
Or, looking at it from a different perspective, are you accusing me of sitting on the fence or what? Is the fact that I agree with something you said mean that I'm just trying to go along with what you say and stay in the shadows? It's one fucking post. Give me some time to do some good analysis.
This was your third chance to explain.Far_Cry wrote:Man, and more things come up. I'll try to get a response up tomorrow.
Vote explanation fail.thor wrote:vote: Bub Bidderskins