Open 258 --- Night Watch --- Game Over

2003041 · Post Post #11 (isolation #0) » Thu Oct 14, 2010 1:57 pm

Vote Antihero

You're negative to my Guitar Hero.

2003041 · Post Post #45 (isolation #1) » Fri Oct 15, 2010 5:24 am

clarifying: you mean 'lynch all lurkers', right?

2003041 · Post Post #50 (isolation #2) » Fri Oct 15, 2010 6:43 am

nameloc1986 wrote:
2003041 wrote:clarifying: you mean 'lynch all lurkers', right?
No I mean 'lynch an idiot'

Ah, okay. That's why I asked.

I ran into this problem in my first game here. In a sense, it really depends on the situation of whether its the best lynch for the day or if there's someone posibly acting scummier. If you have to do this sort of thing, then I agree that it can only really be done on the first day.

As for 'lynch all lurkers', it also depends on the situation, but I'd rather wait for a replacement before jumping to do anything.

2003041 · Post Post #77 (isolation #3) » Fri Oct 15, 2010 5:36 pm

I wouldn't choose anyone right now because those votes are from the RVS stage. I would note vote for either one because there are no arguments for them (even there are no arguments agaisnt them either). As long as everyone participates and we don't lynch too early D1, we stand a better chance of catching scum.

Going to Joystick's point, even if we get a VT claim D1, that's not such a bad thing because we would have a better idea of who the scum may be. And, if they're ruly acting scummy (as in their on everyone's list), it wouldn't be the worst lynch possible IMO.

Also, BAZZ!!! YOU'R HERE TOO!!!!!! Here's hoping that you don't get replaced lol.

2003041 · Post Post #79 (isolation #4) » Fri Oct 15, 2010 5:45 pm

I still wouldn't. There's no evidence. I really don't support a lynch if there's little to no evidence.

2003041 · Post Post #104 (isolation #5) » Sat Oct 16, 2010 4:07 pm

@DF: I really don't know if a no lynch would be beneficial at all in this type of set-up (probably not), but my point was that if there is not enough evidence for me to merit a vote, I will not vote. I stand by what I say in post 77 that a lynch will give us more info than a no lynch, but I don't want to vote for someone just because I HAVE to vote.

2003041 · Post Post #160 (isolation #6) » Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:11 pm

nameloc1986 wrote:
2003041 wrote:@DF: I really don't know if a no lynch would be beneficial at all in this type of set-up (probably not), but my point was that if there is not enough evidence for me to merit a vote, I will not vote. I stand by what I say in post 77 that a lynch will give us more info than a no lynch, but I don't want to vote for someone just because I HAVE to vote.
Alright, let's say that hypothetically that two people were at L-1 right before deadline. You don't have strong scum reads against either of them but your decision was key to making a lynch. What would you do?

I don't know whether in this setup if a no lynch wouldn't hurt town or not. Even if I don't have a strong read on a player as scum, it would be very difficult for me to hammer. I would probably do a re-read and look at all the evidence and make a choice based on that. If a no lynch has a negative impact on the town in any way, I would vote, but not before looking at the cases presented.

Also, I apologize for not posting much. I've been running around everywhere recently. I'm hoping that either tomorrow or wednesday I can do some isos and get some questions out there.

2003041 · Post Post #396 (isolation #7) » Fri Oct 22, 2010 12:35 pm

I apologize. I have a lot going on right now and didnt want you guys to suffer any longer from my lurking. I apologize.