Mafia on Holy Orders (Game Over!)

[Chronopie]

EBWOP: L-2

But add in Furc and/or plum and that's lynching territory, so... yeah.

[Furcolow]

I feel like sociopath doesn't resolve the issue, really. CKD/Iecerint = one of these are scum according to Socrates.
Iecerint claims this is bullshit, but I am going with Socrates on this one. One of these guys are scum.

If Iecerint is scum, I wouldn't be surprised if Sociopath is scum.
If CKD is scum, I would be surprised Sociopath is scum.

Perhaps we can lynch Sociopath, and if he isn't scum, it somewhat clears both of these guys?
That's actually not that bad.
I'm considering voting just for that reason. Plus it's at 24%.... I just don't want to be finagled. I hope that is the right word. I don't want the wool pulled over my eyes.

[AGar]

/prodded. I liked your previous picture moar Vi.

Plum's still not voting. Battery's at 24%. SP is spouting shit. What's new?

And you're not either.

Hypocrisy much?

Also, Chronopie #2049: Baaaaa

Goddammit.

I'm not thrilled with SP lynch.
But it's decently pointed.
But I want Pac or Iece lynched.
Fucking battery powered deadlines.

How many unspeakable things do I have to do to get my Iece lynch?

[Plum]

How many unspeakable things do I have to do to get my Iece lynch?

Hopefully not too many . . .

VOTE: pacman281292

I prefer this. I really am having a hard time reading the SP/CKD debate and Socio is

not making it any easier

(hint: he should be).

[Vi]

Vote Count LXVI

~ Decision time

SocioPath (L-2) ~ Iecerint, curiouskarmadog, Chronopie

curiouskarmadog (L-3) ~ pacman, SocioPath
Iecerint (L-4) ~ AGar
pacman (L-4) ~ Plum

Not Voting:

Chronopie, Plum,

Furcolow

AGar 0 | Chronopie 0 PROD1 1 | Furc 0 | Iece 1 | pacman 1 | Plum 0 | ckd 1 | Socio 1 PROD1 7

-A small glow surrounds Plum as of post 2053...

--With 8 alive, it takes 5 to lynch and 4 to No Lynch.

---I don't remember if I included Chronopie in the statistic in my sig. I think I did.

Battery power:

||||

|

||||

|

||

(12%)

[Plum]

Guys.

I got a glow.

Hate to break it to you, but I'm taking that as a positive sign.

[Chronopie]

UNVOTE: Sociopath
VOTE: Pacman

aye aye, mam.

[SocioPath]

sorry for multi posts...just pissed now....but found interesting on further thought.





I was pissed because the quoted is a different scenario, but then I started thinking about it from SP's POV

you JUMPED off a scum wagon (vezo) to vote with Vezo on Pac...

I jumped off your wagon, to vote with you on pac....

are you calling me a hypocrite with that vote...you must be?

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
....think you just slipped up bud...
.
for me to be a hypocrite and the scenarios to be exact....I had to have already been on a scum wagon (yours) before switching to Pac...

thank you for making that easy SP.

sorry plum, this seems obvious at this point.

unvote, vote SP

I say both Pac and SP are scum, but SP leads the two...going with gut....

This is the biggest "NO U" misrep of all misreps.

Lets take this step by step, shall we?:

Nope, you voting with that guy again you want everyone to believe you thought was scum…on Pac….who is the other wagon???....oh yeah..that guy you want everyone to believe is scummy.

This is a pretty discombobulated line of thought, but what it is saying is:
'Socio claims that Vezok is scummy, but at the same time Socio unvoted Vezokscum to vote for pacman, why would Socio claim that Vezok is scum and yet vote the same person that Vezokscum is voting for?'

Then in his very next post:

My gut is now screaming SP, but at one point Pac did stand out..

Unvote, vote Pac….

Which is saying:
'I think SP is scum, but at the same time I will unvote Socioscum to vote for pacman, which is the same person that Socioscum is voting for.'


SORRY FOLKS, IT DONT WORK THAT WAY.

[pacman281292]

Argh. Got distracted by Marathon Day.
Sorry. First thing I'll do tomorrow when I log in will be catching up with what I promised.
Damn.

[curiouskarmadog]

Guys.

I got a glow.

Hate to break it to you, but I'm taking that as a positive sign.

Haylen got a glow too....

[Plum]

Yeah but I've been getting mega radiance.

Also read back the glows from the last 10 votecounts and see if you see a pattern. Or multiple patterns.

[Furcolow]

unvote (if i need to);
vote pacman

legend of zelda music plz

[AGar]

Pac is suitable.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Pacman#####

L-1. That be claimin' time for ye.

[curiouskarmadog]

Yeah but I've been getting mega radiance.

Also read back the glows from the last 10 votecounts and see if you see a pattern. Or multiple patterns.

I think you are town...I think the "powers that be" think you are town....please can we lynch SP instead?....I will hammer pac if needed....but would rather we go SP

[pacman281292]

@AGar: I already claimed in the D3 wagon. I'm vanilla townie with absolutely no special power.
Time for defense. First, completing the CKD reread I never finished. Hold on.

[pacman281292]

Before starting, I want you to think something here. On ISO157, CKD says that he can understand my vote, as I do have a case, and Furc doesn't. This, alone, means nothing. However, shortly thereafter, the idea of lynching me got reborn (thanks to Plum *cough* *cough*). Then, at ISO171, CKD decided that I didn't actually have a case, and he voted me with no good reasons (as far as I saw, only thing you noted was the quoted post from... what? 5 PAGES into the game). On the meanwhile, CKD decided to keep his vote on SP because of him "withholding his vote". What could have caused that flip-flop, other than the idea of my lynch reappearing?
Seriously, I don't know.
Also, the case on me: Plum's case is her D3 case. I think I already replied it back there, and Plum decidede that my reply wasn't convincent enough. Either I missed something really big, or she did never state why wasn't my reply adequate. Then, her D5 case ended up being the same than the D3 case. Chronopie sheeped because of the lights (WARNING don't forget that one fo the lights comes from scum. Don't get fooled!), then AGar and Furc jumped without much reasons either (AGar passed from not mentioning me on his posts to suddenly call me scum. whut? Furc had been flip-flopping between SP, CKD and me the whole day). All I can wait for is CKD or Iecerint quickhammering.
lol.
If I do have time, I'll try to skimread Chronopie. I want to recheck what Plum said about him being obvtown.
Humm...

[pacman281292]

EBWOP: means nothing scummy, at first paragraph.

[Iecerint]

I lean SP slightly, but I'll hammer pacman. He's definitely my second. Are we ready for it, or are we wanting to watch him temporize a bit?

[Iecerint]

DON'T TEMPORIZE.
IT'S ILL-ADVISED
TO MOISTURIZE.

?

[pacman281292]

@Iecerint: Heh, as I expected. However, I want to finish my deeds before getting hammered.

ISO100: Complains about Furc callig himself obvtown as of Soc's chart.

Fair enough I guess. What makes Furc so obvtown is his interaction with vezokpiraka early in the game. That was discussed on early D3.

ISO101: Asks for reasons behind the M=W lynch.

This question, coming four hours after your "hey guys Iec is scum because pwnsome gut says so" post, looks *somehow* hypocritical. However, it's still a good point.

ISO102-103: First points out some flip-floppy posts by Furc.

Is there any point you're trying to show, other than Furc's flip-flop? It would have been better to elaborate. No need now, but...

Then, more of "why the chart explains you're town".

Again, lacks content.

ISO104: Elaborates on the previous attacks on Furc.

Aahh, better.

ISO105-106: Repeats the question in ISO100, then points out Haylen's flail post.

Not sure on what should I feel here.

ISO107: Posts his stance on Furc: Poorly-playing Town.

I don't like this post. Basically, you have just been pushing hard against a player that... humm... you consider town. This means all the string of aforementioned posts were just useless posting. You just slipped that all your posting was active lurking.
LOLWUT

ISO108: ISO100.
ISO109: Gives up on questioning Furc.

Indeed, it's better to stop this. What you had been trying to do was just useless anyway. I don't think the chart implies Furc town. What implies Furc town is different. I just don't know which point were you trying to prove here.

ISO110: M=W points out player interactions to CKD. CKD misunderstands, asking what would that imply on M=W's case.

No, that means nothing for M=W's case. That is, indeed, the reason why Furc is actually town. He basically answered you the question on ISO100. The chart doesn't imply fact without analysis; what implies Furctown is player interaction.
The post itself is null IMO.

ISO111-112: Repeats question in ISO101.

Still good point. When I tried to answer it, I didn't find much things implying M=W scum.

ISO113: Asks lights whether hammering would be a good idea.

What made you switch from thinking "There is no case on M=W" to think "I'm thinking on hammering M=W. Thoughts?"?
WTF

ISO114: More questions for lights.
ISO115: Tries yet another reckless push for the Iecerint lynch, as the M=W lynch had again fell through.

If you want to achieve a lynch on yourself, act scummy. If you want to achieve a lynch on Iecerint, make an actual case. This kind of posting is plain useless.

ISO116: Votes Chronopie.

Mind saying why do you think Chrono is scummy?

ISO117: Jumps back to Iecerint.

What the heck?

ISO118: I'll directly quote this post.

Agar, is my "doing nothing" scummy? Why or why not.

Two words. ACTIVE LURKING. It's what you've been trying to do. Looking active, while actually not contributing to catch scum.

when Iece flips scum, how will that affect your opinion? What will you be saying tomorrow if M=W flips town?

Two words as well. Loaded logic. You say "Iece will flip scum" as it was fact. If you do actually want Iece to ever flip, make a f***ing case, explaining us why do you think he'll flip scum. M=W flipped town, yes, but...

ISO119-120: Useless one-liners.
ISO121-122: Asks AGar to say a percentage of how scummy M=W is. Asks me why do I think he has no case on Iece.

I don't know how would the first question be of some use. Second question... I replied it back there, and after rechecking my answer still stands.

ISO123: Useless one-liner at the very end of D4.
M=W (town) is lynched.
ISO124: Comments on the M=W flip. Claims feeling the Haylen claim was a lie. Turns around on his gut Iece case (

maybe the fact he wasn't able to back it up forced him to drop it? IDK

).

I don't know what to feel. The sudden Iece turn-around looks fishy, and I don't know whether the speculation on Haylen's claim is sincere or just staged. Humm...

Pages 6-8 of ISO in next post.

[pacman281292]

DON'T TEMPORIZE.
IT'S ILL-ADVISED
TO MOISTURIZE.

?

What is this supposed to mean??

[Iecerint]

It's a song that has the word "temporize."

[Plum]

Pacman, you're avoiding the issue.

Top suspects in a form that's not tl;dr ASAP if you're actually Town. If not, we can skip that step.

[pacman281292]

@Plum: I don't know what do you mean.
My reads are (mostly) stated at post 1980. My top scum read is still CKD.
Do you want them more elaborated? or briefer?
Also, is there anything on my case other than your D3 case? Or not?

[Plum]

A blow-by-blow rendering of someone's ISO is not going to help us in the long run if by some miracle you're actually Town. Conclusions of the ISO stated without excess fat just might. Mkay?