Mini 1080 -- txtMafia -- Game OVER

[Korts]

vote: The Fonz

; hasn't posted yet, must be lurking. I would prefer if noone used annoying txt abbreviations and shorthands. Preciate it.

[Korts]

I agree, Herodotus. Double or tripleposting is acceptable but no further than that please.

[Korts]

You must be a sadist, hence the vote.

But sadism doesn't equal scumminess. Your case is flawed.

[Korts]

Fonz: Txtspk annoying but if anything, more pro-town than anti-; game reference not ongoing; Tasky referenced game as well. Why target mothrax?

[Korts]

EBWOP: correction, the game mothrax referenced is indeed ongoing. Moot point. Antihero, feel free to explain.

[Korts]

Antihero re: RayFrost vote, that should imply RayFrostscum too. Why no mention of him on your part? Re: reaction, fair point. Re: awkward, debatable tell.

[Korts]

And yes, I expect an explanation of fishy as well.

[Korts]

Aurorus: I said "if anything". It's more reasonable to say it is pro- than to say it is anti-. Most reasonable to say it is neither here nor there.

[Korts]

Equinox 55: first silly argument I could get a foothold on. Trying to get into pseudo-serious discussion. Nowhere near hypocritical, try again.

[Korts]

Equi58: assuming your vote is suspicious (Antihero says so) Ray is different from other oldies, likely in alignment. Hypothetical; Antihero missed/ommited this.

[Korts]

Ray: if we go with the theory that Equinox hypo-scum had other reasons for voting you, as Antihero suggests, you are likely scum bussed.

[Korts]

Equinox 78: Antihero has a point, but I'm undecided as to whether it's alignment relevant.

[Korts]

Equinox: yes it fucking is an answer. Scumtells aren't fucking magic.

[Korts]

Equinox: You asked me what my opinion is regarding Antihero's case, I told you I have none right now.

[Korts]

Antihero, please answer my question whenever it's convenient.

[Korts]

You really don't. I have to know whether his case is genuine. I can see where he's coming from but I'm not sold.

[Korts]

I didn't know about equiscum at that point yet

yes you did.

[Korts]

You don't make pairs without scumflips? Fair enough. Post 25 implied otherwise.

[Korts]

Expect substantial contribution from me on Monday, probably. Have various deadlines. Apologies for inconveniences.

[Korts]

got deadline extension on essay, tomorrow i'm unlikely to post. in exchange i'll try some catching up now.

[Korts]

Tasky's a run of the mill policy lynch. I've seen too many town have bad playstyles to accept this as a scumtell. Let's move on to actual scumhunting.

[Korts]

Fishy is suspect. Makes a case with two null points and one terrible: depicting rhetoric as scummy is a scum tactic. WAGON HO

VOTE: unvote, vote: Fishy

[Korts]

Vote tags are weird. Back in our time all we had was bolding...

[Korts]

What purpose does a vote on a player on V/LA without prior offenses serve? Scum purposes more likely. IGMEOH and Fonz/Herodotus were both town reactions IMO.

[Korts]

Actually

VOTE: Tasky[/b]

Fishy can go tomorrow.

[Korts]

grumble grumble vote tags

VOTE: Tasky

[Korts]

I'm torn on Tasky. My intuition tells me nothing about his V/LA vote thing now that I've calmed down. Fishy, however, I'm increasingly sure of.

VOTE: Fishy

[Korts]

Tasky: whatever you think your about your playstyle, we know better. Get to work.

[Korts]

Meanwhile, I'd appreciate if more people realized that I'm right about the Fishy wagon.

[Korts]

Fonz, tell me, how many semi-exp. VTs have you seen professing the same playstyle as Tasky? I'd rather have him interact than be the butt of a policy lynch.

[Korts]

The town's made the ultimatum requesting contribution from him. If he continues to be passive I'm happy to lynch him, but beforehand I want to see him do stuff.

[Korts]

will post tomorrow. busy day, need sleep now.

[Korts]

Sorry about my recent silence, had an unexpected job taking up my mental energies. I will catch up tonight, hopefully.

[Korts]

mod: replace me please

my lifestyle doesn't support playing forum mafia even in txt form. :sadface: