MUNSCM - Abandoned

Leonidas · Post Post #8 (isolation #0) » Mon Dec 08, 2003 1:29 pm

Salaam aleikum, band of heretics.

Leonidas · Post Post #36 (isolation #1) » Wed Dec 10, 2003 3:39 pm

I'm going to speak against the proposal.

Leonidas · Post Post #45 (isolation #2) » Thu Dec 11, 2003 1:55 am

* a fly is flying *

* the paint is drying *

* elephants are mating *

Leonidas · Post Post #72 (isolation #3) » Fri Dec 12, 2003 4:05 pm

Honorable delegates, Algeria believes we should either protect a country which has veto power, or determine randomly the country that is to benefit from the anti-missile shield.

Leonidas · Post Post #74 (isolation #4) » Fri Dec 12, 2003 4:17 pm

Honorable delegates, the proposed motion, while guaranteeing the usage of our anti-missile shield, does NOT provide us with optimal use of this precious ressource. Several methods have already been suggested to determine the country we choose to protect: more specifically, a random deployment, as proposed by Germany, would give us an opportunity to trick the axis of evil.

Algeria also believes that, if such a method cannot be worked out by the delegates, we should choose a country with veto power as the beneficiary.

Leonidas · Post Post #78 (isolation #5) » Fri Dec 12, 2003 6:15 pm

Point of order directed to the Chaiman:

I thought delegates opposed to a motion were entitled to speak. I fail to see why this makes me vote automatically in a separate motion, which is 'Should we close the discussion on the proposed topic'.

Leonidas · Post Post #79 (isolation #6) » Fri Dec 12, 2003 6:16 pm

The delegate from Algeria is

in favour

of the motion.

Leonidas · Post Post #83 (isolation #7) » Sat Dec 13, 2003 5:18 am

Respectable delegate of Brazil, countries with veto power are more powerful, and therefore more likely to be targets of the axis of evil. They are likely to have additional capabilities that Chile does not have.

I am now stepping down as speaker.

Leonidas · Post Post #101 (isolation #8) » Tue Dec 16, 2003 2:16 am

Leonidas · Post Post #156 (isolation #9) » Thu Dec 18, 2003 5:21 pm

Algeria votes

in favour

.

Leonidas · Post Post #176 (isolation #10) » Mon Jan 05, 2004 8:40 pm

* lays praying carpet on the floor *

* turns towards Mecca*

* prays *

Leonidas · Post Post #185 (isolation #11) » Fri Jan 09, 2004 12:08 am

* stands up *

* picks up carpet *

Leonidas · Post Post #190 (isolation #12) » Fri Jan 09, 2004 5:40 pm

Algeria is

in favour

of closing the debate.

Leonidas · Post Post #271 (isolation #13) » Wed Jan 28, 2004 2:38 pm

(The UK has already vetoed.)

Leonidas · Post Post #278 (isolation #14) » Fri Jan 30, 2004 3:23 pm

Alright. Algeria

votes against

.

Leonidas · Post Post #321 (isolation #15) » Mon Feb 16, 2004 1:13 pm

Algeria votes

in favour

.

Leonidas · Post Post #549 (isolation #16) » Mon Apr 12, 2004 8:27 pm

Algeria votes

in favour

.

Leonidas · Post Post #570 (isolation #17) » Sun Apr 18, 2004 12:28 pm

Hmm... yeah.

vote: in favour

.

Note to self: I really, really have to catch up on this one. Sorry - I promise to participate more.

Leonidas · Post Post #819 (isolation #18) » Sun May 30, 2004 8:05 pm

(Night prayer is finished. Stands up. Cleans carpet. Goes back to seat).

I'm here your Honor. Err.

Algeria votes

in favor

.

Leonidas · Post Post #822 (isolation #19) » Sun May 30, 2004 9:52 pm

(Apologies Mikehart)

(leaves the UN, resumes prayers outside of the building, waiting for his colleague)