MUNSCM - Abandoned

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #13 (isolation #0) » Mon Dec 08, 2003 7:19 pm

Pakistan? That's the best you can do? Pah.

*strokes nuclear bombs*

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #42 (isolation #1) » Wed Dec 10, 2003 7:26 pm

I request time to speak against the proposal as well. However, if the speakers before me make the same points I am planning to make, I will withdraw.

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #53 (isolation #2) » Fri Dec 12, 2003 5:48 am

*makes rhubarb rhubarb noises, while waiting for the speaker to get to the point*

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #57 (isolation #3) » Fri Dec 12, 2003 6:47 am

Point of information directed toward the speaker:

does the speaker realise that what he is saying (as long as someone gets it) is not equivalent to a random choice?

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #60 (isolation #4) » Fri Dec 12, 2003 6:53 am

Point of information directed toward the speaker:

Does the speaker realise that this point of view is likely to bring him Pakistan's vote when we get to decide whom to nuke first?

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #62 (isolation #5) » Fri Dec 12, 2003 7:01 am

Point of information directed toward the speaker:

I am not threatening. I am simply stating a fact. Once we will vote for a nuclear strike on a member, you will be on my shortlist.

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #88 (isolation #6) » Sat Dec 13, 2003 6:55 pm

The delegate from Pakistan votes in favour of the motion to end discussion.

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #106 (isolation #7) » Tue Dec 16, 2003 5:12 am

Point of information directed toward the speaker:

Whilst I agree with the principle behind this, I wonder whether using a BNG to determine the country to be inspected would not be more effective? Or in other words? Why in particular China?

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #107 (isolation #8) » Tue Dec 16, 2003 5:13 am

(BNG is of course the new TLA for random number generator)

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #109 (isolation #9) » Tue Dec 16, 2003 5:40 am

*hangs head in shame*

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #113 (isolation #10) » Tue Dec 16, 2003 7:14 am

Point of information directed toward the speaker:

Whilst I agree with the principle behind this, I wonder whether using a RNG to determine the country to be inspected would not be more effective?

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #151 (isolation #11) » Thu Dec 18, 2003 8:44 am

Pakistan votes in favour.

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #175 (isolation #12) » Mon Jan 05, 2004 7:53 pm

*snores*

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #195 (isolation #13) » Sat Jan 10, 2004 1:31 am

Pakistan is in favour as well.

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #198 (isolation #14) » Sun Jan 11, 2004 7:44 pm

Pakistan thirds that motion. We're "playing" this game now for a month, and are still establishing the mechanics.
I liked the set-up, but this pace is frustrating.

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #212 (isolation #15) » Fri Jan 16, 2004 7:58 pm

I don't like dropping out of games unless I'm going on holiday, but the pace of this game is really too slow for my liking.
With an eager replacement available, I think it's better if I'm out.

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #264 (isolation #16) » Sat Jan 24, 2004 9:15 am

The delegate from Pakistan is getting some understanding why Dubya decided to bypass the UN completely.

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #267 (isolation #17) » Wed Jan 28, 2004 2:52 am

The delegate from Pakistan starts to think that everyone has been replaced, except that the new players failed to show up.

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #277 (isolation #18) » Fri Jan 30, 2004 7:08 am

Well, if you can find a replacement?

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #279 (isolation #19) » Mon Feb 02, 2004 8:17 pm

Pakistan votes against

Pakistan also puts his feet on the table, closes his eyes, falls asleep and dreams of sheep.