Umbrage, not random voting aside, stifling conversation is bad, and that's what you've done by playing this out before it happens. Can you explain why you thought that would be a good thing?Umbrage wrote:*doesn't random vote*
*waits for people to say not random voting is scummy*
*waits for people to say that saying not random voting is scummy is scummy*
Have you ever thought about why games have a tendency to open like that?Umbrage wrote:Every game I've seen has started with someone who doesn't do RVS, and is then bandwagoned. I wanted to shake things up a little.
I don't mind that you answered this one specifically, and I know you claim to hate doing so, but in the future please don't answer questions directed at other people. You have no way of knowing if I would mind or not, and far more often than not, I will.Olinea wrote:I hate answering questions for others, I've been called out on it, but this should bring us all up to speed.
I wasn't being coy, you quoted someone else when asking what you asked, the content of that quote was about me, so I assumed you were asking me the question, but generally questions below quotes are directed at the poster of the quote. I was mildly confused so asked for clarities sake.ThAdmiral wrote:Yes. Don't play coy. This is the second time you avoided giving a reason to your vote.chamber wrote:Are you asking me?
I see you have since done so. Thank you for that, but why not state this up front?
Post count doesn't mean that much, many of the posts in here are fast 1 liners. Clarity is important enough to justify all of the posts I've made that you seem to find useless, I shall continue to make them as long as people aren't clear. Scum and town DON'T approach the RVS the same way.Umbrage wrote:
The "is this question rhetorical, are you asking me, I thought that was the other guy" posts can go. For Pete's sake, we're already on page 3. It's Christmas, people. Relax.
Also, people shouldn't have to explain their random votes. That's because they are random. Scum and town approach the RVS in the same way. It's all null, people.
I actually found that throw away line at the bottom to be incredibly scummy. He's framed his post in a way to attack you but isn't committing to it. It looks scummy as hell. Fewer people should be scummy in this game, I can't vote for all of you.el simo wrote:unvote: Umbrage
I just made another ranting post about how you don't understand, and then noticed at the bottom of the post you said, "I just don't what to think," which implies I'm right and you don't understand, I guess that can be townie motivation.
Vote: Ortiz
And what conclusions do you draw from that observation?Olinea wrote:This looks like an admission that the vote was legitimately RVS without any reasoning and now people are attacking el simo for it.ThAdmiral wrote:I believe you tried to make a "random" or jokey vote and you copped heat for it and are now trying to explain your way out of it.el simo wrote:Do you want to explain that discrepancy or do you want to keep on being subtle and vague?
The type of 'proper case' you seem to want is incredibly anti-town, so there is no way I'm giving you one. My ISO is likely a faster read than yours, you can deal with reading it. A bunch on 1 liners >>>>> walls of text. Add this ultimatum to the list of things that make you scummy.Umbrage wrote: @ chamber: Either make a proper case on me or get off my wagon. And I mean a case laid out in a single post. Reading your ISO is like wading through a swamp.
Your previous post suggested you thought ScumCyberBob was on the lynch because he thought it would be easy. This one suggests you think hes on it as an earnest policy lynch. Which is it?el simo wrote:Because as soon as someone votes him he will reply with a wave of OMGUS which someone else will think is a scum tell and will vote him and then he will start complaining about how he should be replaced or how he should be mod killed or how it's all unfair or how he is going to vote himself or AoE the hell out of us and then someone will decided this is a scum tell and vote him for that and then you have genius' like Cyberbob who will push policy lynches on him because he doesn't present his cases in the most coherent sentences and then next thing we know we will have lynch of someone who actually hasn't done anything scummy.chamber wrote:@el simoWhy do you feel like furcolow is an easy lynch? He doesn't look like it at all to me.
It happens every game. Literally, if he isn't shot at night he goes down in a ball fire, guns blazing at everyone after scum decided to push his wagon off a cliff. He is like a magnet for them.
Furcolow is the burly that chums the waters mafia swim in.
Bold mine.el simo wrote: Because as soon as someone votes him he will reply with a wave of OMGUS which someone else will think is a scum tell and will vote him and then he will start complaining about how he should be replaced or how he should be mod killed or how it's all unfair or how he is going to vote himself or AoE the hell out of us and then someone will decided this is a scum tell and vote him for that andthen you have genius' like Cyberbob who will push policy lynches on himbecause he doesn't present his cases in the most coherent sentences and then next thing we know we will have lynch of someone who actually hasn't done anything scummy.