Glass wrote:Wow, way to misinterpret what I said.
I never said I had a town read on Fungrus; you asked where I got my read on him from, and I responded accordingly.
This is an especially funny quote to me - because I wasn't talking about your read on Fungrus and never asked about it either as I recall we were talking about Napher. Do you think I misinterpreted your read on him? If so - specifically how. If you really think I was misinterpreting you about Fungrus I'd like to hear that as well. You're calling me "misinterpreting" when I would call everything I've been doing "trying to understand what you are saying" and I rather feel the conversation is going like this;
You: I believe A!
Me: Why do you believe A?
You: X! X, damn your eyes!
Me: So...X-1?
You: Screw you, why are you bringing up B!?!
Me: Um...I thought we were talking about A, what is this about B?
You: X you dithering, drooling nicompoop!
Me: So...wait, B is X?
You: Misrep! Why aren't you talking about C?
Me: ...I hate you.
I'm attempting to understand you and I don't feel you are helping, please help more and explain your thought processes to me the same way you'd explain them to a not-so bright rock. Maybe that will help. Let's start with the whole reason you think Napher is town and what (if anything) Fungrus has to do with that and/or how you think I brought Fungrus into the Napher discussion.
So whats your issue with my read on ender?
I've already said it. I really am beginning to wonder if I'm typing in a strange dialect you don't understand. As previously noted; you asked why I wasn't scumhunting someone you had a town read on in what appeared to be a case of redirection attempt on your part.
thor665 wrote:@Glass - it's not that he didn't vote him, it's that he called his actions scummy and didn't vote for him. If you have no reads on anyone and then someone does something scummy what reason is there to not vote them? I submit that there really isn't one
That's the explanation that you said, but you disregarded fungrus's justification of not voting him. Fungrus did not believe that it was a scummy move by ender but he believed that voting no one in this setup is good for the mafia, and ender clearly did not know that. So I see no reason as to why fungrus is scummy for informing ender it is unwise to not lynch. Not to mention that this is based on the fact that Fungrus did not vote someone they found scummy, yet here we stand here without you voting me.
*sigh*
I have already explained why I have not moved my vote yet, Mr. Bump understood it, why don't you?
Second off, whether or not you agree on my scumtell on Fungrus doesn't prove or disprove that it is a valid tell. I consider it a valid tell, decide whether I am doing that because I am brilliant, stupid, or scum, but don't just act as though the tell is invalid in my belief system unless you just want to always lynch people whose playstyles you disagree with.
You clearly seem to think of me as scum, so for convenience sake can you explain exactly what makes me scummy? I'm sure it would be more convenient for other's as well as for me to explain anything.
Already done to an extent - but frankly unless I'm actively voting you it's not advantageous to work up a case on you and drum up support.
Glass wrote:Glass wrote: Does that mean you find everyone you talk to scummy?
That was an actual question btw.
Really?
Wooosh.
That was an actual answer.
No, I don't find everyone i talk to scummy - that's insane to even begin to believe.
Yes, the people I actively am questioning/probing are more likely to be scum in my eyes and the people I am more relaxed around are more likely to be town in my eyes - that's common sense.