MUNSCM - Abandoned

[Thoth]

Olé

[Thoth]

What is the deadline for this night? I would like to draw a resolution when I find some extra time, but if night ends while I'm working on it I'm not happy .

[Thoth]

In Favour

[Thoth]

Spain would also like to be plaved on the list of speakers in order to voice it's concerns about this proposal.

[Thoth]

plaved = placed

[Thoth]

Do we first have to vote about the amendment and if it is voted through do we then discuss the whole resolution again?


If we do not discuss the resolution again after the vote about the amendment then Spain would like to speak opposed to the amendment. If we do then Spain would prefer to speak opposed to the complete resolution though.

[Thoth]

vote:in favour

[Thoth]

Spain also wishes to close debate on the current issue.

[Thoth]

Vote: In favour of motion to caucus

[Thoth]

I think I have a solution for the deployment of weapons inspectors and MABM that is a lot better.

We somehow determine a country A today(random or otherwise, but a country we know before the night) that will get the weapons inspectors results and where we also place the MABM. Next we let the chair randomly choose a country B to send the weapons inspectors to. This way we will always get a result unless B gets randomly nuked.

If the result is evil we of course nuke B. If the result is good we have a confirmed innocent. Tomorrow we then place MABM in B and send the weapons inspectors results to B as well. We let the chair randomly choose country C to be inspected by the weapons inspectors. This way we have another confirmed innocent C (unless he was found evil of course in which case we nuke him)
The night after that we let the chair randomly pick a country from B and C in which both MABM will be placed and to which the weapons inspectors results will be send. etc.

Possible starting cases:
A & B are both good. Things go according to this plan
A is good and B is evil. Nuke B and try again next night.
A is evil and B is good.
...If A lies we change a good for an evil and try again next night
...If A doesn't lie we still have the confirmed innocent.
A & B are both evil and A lies about B. This is the only problem case. Note that the chance of this scenario is only about 3%. The solution I think is best to cover this case as well is to investigate A on one of the later nights. If he turns out evil we then have to reinvestigate B.

[Thoth]

Darn, 2 posts while I was typing .

[Thoth]

We also don't get it if the country receiving the report is scum. As we're not informed who that country is they can just keep the results to themselves.
That's why I think we should place the MABM in the country that's going to receive the report.

[Thoth]

If a scum country gets the report, they HAVE to reveal their innocent, otherwise they are revealed as scum!!!

Why? If the receiver is randomly determined then we don't know who it is, so how are they revealed as scum?
If the receiver is not randomly determined and does not have MABM in it they are just going to get nuked by the axis of evil, making the weapons inspector's investigation useless as we do not get it.

[Thoth]

Spain votes

in favour

[Thoth]

Spain

votes:in favour

of the motion to amend the agenda.

[Thoth]

Spain

votes against

the motion to close debate.

[Thoth]

vote:in favour

[Thoth]

Spain votes

In favour