I'll pass on PikachuGM's questions.
In a game with crossfire, I in particular have every reason to want to be Town (plus I prefer being Town in the first place).
I'm not doubting that. But you even said some of your cause for concern was from circumstances in this game.SensFan wrote:Vi:
For the most part, I'm a logical and rational person. At the time I posted that, I was pissed.
When I said I don't like your questions, I pretty clearly meant I didn't like ANY of your questions. The only one that WOULD be alignment-relevant is the first one. Please prove me wrong. (That, and I didn't feel like thinking about them at ten at night.)PikachuGM 39 wrote:Even if you don't like the first one, why not answer the others?
If I answered one of AGM's questions, it was by accident.Kublai Khan wrote:Why are you passing on the questions? Wait, check that, why did you answer the first question and ignore the rest?Vi (5) wrote:I'll pass on PikachuGM's questions.
In a game with crossfire, I in particular have every reason to want to be Town (plus I prefer being Town in the first place).
What do you meanby crossfire?
It's not legitimate.Also, I refuse to sheep Fate until I can understand what he's saying. And is the mason claim legitimate or are you guys just fucking around?
xvart wrote:Going along these lines it should also be noted that DGB played the "everyone knows I picked town" card early in the game and she flipped scum, so Fate's (or anyones) post in the signup thread will not dissuade me from thinking he is scum if he behaves like scum.Vi, 63 wrote:*I co-modded Pledge of Allegiance, another game where people could choose their alignment.
Giving everyone the alignment they wanted, it came down to
**5 Mafia
**8 Neutral
**11 Town
so even after accounting for differences in the player list, the idea that EVERYONE would choose Town is probably not true at all.
*People picking a "challenging" alignment works mostly if they like being either alignment.
Also, Vi - along these lines, what do you think of SpyreX's post here:You both were co-mods in Pledge of Allegiance so I think SpyreX would know that a decent number of people would probably pick Orange as their first pick so why would he pick a singular faction that would go to someone's number one? It seems like a throw away color choice.SpyreX, 57 wrote:my second pick was orange and i didn't get it
You're certainly entitled to your opinion about the use of your questions, but.AlmasterGM wrote:Anyway, there is a game-relevant POINT to all of the questions ... which is why I am annoyed that Vi will not answer them.
Why don't you like the questions? I'd be happy to explain the usefullness of each one ... after you answer them. And yes, they all have a function.
Hint: "They're pointless" isn't a valid answer. Even if you think they are stupid, it takes about 90 seconds to answer them ... time you clearly had because you managed to analyze my questions and offer an answer to what you "thought" I was trying to get out of them. Or, if you actually are so incredibly busy that you can't spend 90 seconds answering a few questions, then you shouldn't be playing forum mafia.
Oh, so we're lying about the friendly questions now? Your whole "I have a motive to be town" answer is a pretty clear response to the first question.
AlmasterGM 4 wrote:1) Did you get the color you asked for?
I certainly said I picked Town, but I said nothing about colors.Vi 5 wrote:In a game with crossfire, I in particular have every reason to want to be Town (plus I prefer being Town in the first place).
The former.AlmasterGM wrote:Are they scummy not-good-things or just not-good-things?Vi wrote:*intentionally trying to draw a scene,
*so heavily reliant on this questionnaire for reads that I question your scumhunting efforts, and/or
*acting like Adel
none of which are good things.
SensFan 134 wrote:I submitted Red/Orange (so the mods knew I wanted to be Scum, even if my choices didn't count.) SSBF submitted Yellow/Orange. I was given a Town role.
I think whoever it was that suggested that there were color quotae may have been on the mark, although 9 scum in a 24 player game sounds kind of crazy.SpyreX wrote:Welp, assuming sens is telling the truth I don't even have to ask my question because this game obviously doesn't follow the same methodology that others of this variant would. Considering I'm not the only one who has ran draft variants here and I'm prettyyyyy sure that none of them would give out things if they weren't picked (like SK for example ohhh shiii) well then the like I said albeit small help in knowing orange isn't there isn't there at all.
If its because I'm scumjustdance.
I'm not sure what you're asking me to do here...(as an aside Vi maybe someday I'll have to have you show me your mystic powers because the more I think about it the more I think I've never been an SK but sooo lazy).
My reason for acting out actuallyAlmasterGM wrote:I'd say your calling yourself scummy, then. Sure, maybe my harping on the questions is silly, but you have caused just as large of a scene with your refusal to answer them as I have by asking that you do.
nuh-uh......................... u think u can make me answer ur questions well guess wut... LOL!!!Because Vi is making a point to explicitly refuse to answer them. Also, because I am getting more out of the conversation with Vi than simply "lol wai did u n0t answ3r ma queeesstions hurr."
Funny, one of us with more experience with these games happens to find this to be new and interesting information, and certainly wouldn't prefer the conversation abruptly stop like that.THIS is the cause for the uproar?No shitthere's a chance not everyone who requests scum is going to get scum. If 15 people asked for scum then some of them are going to be town. The end.
Oh, yes, he was absolutely answering your question right there. Your name's in the post and everything.Also I like how Vi said question one was irrelevant, and then when SensFan answered it two posts below the answer suddenly became "interesting."
It gave me a chance to see that your exaggerated attacks were coming from a position that's incomprehensible if you're Town. (Thank you for your cooperation. :alex: )AlmasterGM wrote:Minus the fact that you saved yourself a few minutes by not answering the questions, how does your "acting out" matter? What does it accomplish?Vi wrote:My reason for acting out actually matters.
Go ahead and reread exactly WHY I said it was irrelevant.It is irrelevant who he was talking to. What IS relevant is that you jumped from calling a subject area (whether people got their colors or not) "irrelevant" to "interesting" in a single post. Step back for a second and look at this. Am I actually wrong and misunderstanding what was said, or are you just disagreeing with everything I'm saying simply because it's coming from me?Vi wrote:Oh, yes, he was absolutely answering your question right there. Your name's in the post and everything.
Arguing against yourself looks terrible here.AlmasterGM wrote:There's a pretty clear double standard here. You making a scene = you're scumhunting, me making a scene = I'm scum. Especially given that the "exaggerated attacks" point is pretty untrue (minus the lying thing, which might have crossed the line a little bit. But not that much.).Vi wrote:It gave me a chance to see that your exaggerated attacks were coming from a position that's incomprehensible if you're Town. (Thank you for your cooperation. :alex: )
Yes I did, because I was under the assumption that everyone would claim to have picked Town. I was mistaken.Is this what you are talking about?Vi wrote:Go ahead and reread exactly WHY I said it was irrelevant.If so, in SensFan's case, he didn't get the colors he wanted, he didn't get the alignment he wanted, and he DID say so in thread. And you called it interesting. Not irrelevant.Vi wrote:Re: Getting the colors you wanted - For one, the mod team said they wanted to satisfy as many people as they could, so the answer would mostly be "yes". Even if not, I would presume most people would not be heartbroken if they didn't get their favorite shade of Town for whatever reason, so long as they got the alignment they wanted. And if they didn't get the alignment they wanted, they would probably be better off not saying so explicitly inthread.
I'm calling it as I see it.SensFan 158 wrote:I find that more than a little unfair, just for the record.
Katsuki - No idea. Somehow not as annoying as ecksReck's whining, but only barely.Kdub 204 wrote:What is your opinion so far of the following players: Katsuki, nopoint, Starbuck? No, this is not a random list.
Not really.Toogeloo wrote:@Vi - You don't like Andrius' #170, but what do you feel about the rest of his posts, the ones mostly revolving around rings and colors, like, do you feel that is scum motivated?
which sounds like they claim knowledge of which side of the WIFOM SensFan is coming from.AGar 213 wrote:It's a massive WIFOM trap that some people are falling into.
Let's talk about what KIND of content.Kdub wrote:You initially voted me for lack of content based on three posts that happened within the first 24 hours of the game. My first thought was, "whatever, it's early in the game and it's probably as much for Vi to go on as he could possibly have at this stage". But your continued pushing on my wagon after that, even though I wasn't around and didn't post for a little bit after my third post, had me wondering why you decided to single me out for that reason. I picked a group of players and asked your opinion of them because at the time, I feel like they had contributed about as much (or less) content as I had, yet you were completely silent on them. Your stated opinions of them seem fairly neutral/non-committal, which is in contrast to your opinion of me. Tell me how those players had contributed more content in your opinion, because your reads do not look consistent.Vi wrote:Katsuki - No idea. Somehow not as annoying as ecksReck's whining, but only barely.
npiau - He's trolling the thread. I've seen him play as Town before and he did quite the opposite, but I don't know if what he's doing is alignment-relevant.
Starbuck - I played with her before. As a Neutral party she basically fluffposted the entire 100+page game, from what I recall. That she's doing it again here doesn't particularly surprise me. Someone who knows her meta better than I do can tell me if she does that as Town as well.
I expected ScumFan to be complaining about being scum. I got the opposite of what I expected. I'm p r e t t y sure I said this already.Also, what changed between this:
<stuff>
You added the qualifier "if true", but gave no reason why you thought it was true despite implying that Sens was scum in your previous post.
You were actually TRYING to produce content, and failed.Kdub wrote:Vi, you didn't address my concern. I know that you think my first three posts lacked content. I am asking why you singled me out over other players who you claim to have mostly neutral/no reads on who I think contributed less at that point. In particular, explain why those players posted more content, in your opinion.
Given that this is SensFan and he's upset with his role, I'm fairly positive there's precedent.Kdub wrote:What? Regardless of his alignment, did you expect him to say that the mods gave him anything other than a town role?Vi wrote:I expected ScumFan to be complaining about being scum. I got the opposite of what I expected. I'm p r e t t y sure I said this already.
Not "ruined", but if he wants out, he gets out.Kdub wrote:I guess I don't know what precedent you are referring to. Has he ruined games in the past by claiming scum?Vi wrote:Given that this is SensFan and he's upset with his role, I'm fairly positive there's precedent.
The scum in this game WANT to be scum. Implicitly, that means that the scum are going to be playing very well in this game. If they have daytalk, Town could be in for a world of pain. More relevantly, it means that people who are acknowledged to prefer being scum rightfullyGuderian wrote:Would you mind unpacking this sentence a little more, I'm curious to know where your line of thinking headed with thisvi wrote:That's actually interesting information if true. It likely means that too many people requested scum.
That's correct, he said nothing of the sort. This was me trying to figure out why he chose to out himself as second-xvart 273 wrote:But he didn't say this, did he? He didn't say anything even remotely resembling this. And what town purpose would there be to lie about some ulterior motive of this nature? What town motivation is there to hide any ulterior motive?
Of all the times not to have a suitable image to spam... This will have to do.Fate wrote:it hurts make it stop
no you make it stop you have the power
i cant i cant i cant i cant
vi wweewew
werwerr we arre gvotingn kkkkkkdub why do u care
I'm the one who brought up pick-your-alignment games in the first place, and that's because I remember random useless things. It would not surprise me if SpyreX didn't think of it until I mentioned it.xvart 321 wrote:So you believe his explanation despite his knowledge/experience of draft variant/alignment selection and subsequent refusal to answer direct questions about his explanation? Interesting, seeing as you were the co-mod of Pledge of Allegiance with him, I'm having a difficult time swallowing your belief of his explanation that he would think it would even be remotely possible to get a SK as his second pick.
Reck already did a good job of explaining why they're useless activity substitutes.Kdub wrote:And how is his conditional reads based on Sens scummy?
Plus even after saying this he still goes out of his way to call dramonic possible scum.xRx #26 wrote:but once again this is all speculation based solely on the idea that sensfan is in fact scum
and there are like four people id rather lynch before sensfan so yeah
No idea how you got the impression that xRx's play looks similar to Town play, because if this is his Town play then joining the CAPS LAWCK alliance made him even worse at being Town than he was before.Kdub wrote:The Reck=SK theory is possible since D1 SK play looks similar to town play, but we'll deal with that later on if that's the case.
1+1=1RC wrote:xRECKONERx [1] - KageLord, nopointinactingup
spyspy wagon? more like kdub wagon.Katsuki 397 wrote:i like how once vi calls reck sk everyone starts piling votes onto reck
this is almost a repeat of spyspy wagon early on all this sk voting needs looking at
When did I claim I was good?xRECKONERx wrote:vi shut the fuck up
you are really really not as good as you think you are
Actually not a bad point; I don't think you're Mafia at least.personal attacks and being erratic and obnoxious are my mo
if you want to see how i play as scum go read my wiki
protip
when im actually attempting to appear town im scum
nahFate 426 wrote:i dun get it vi was that wagon on kdub just for information???
i thought he was scum for real
unvote: vote: starbuck
tehee
"Accumulated" means "made by xvart and npiau", I presume...Katsuki 435 wrote:@Vi: By spyspy wagon I meant the one in the early pages where people piled onto him for his choice of orange despite the explanations. It's just so easy imo for scum to go like "OMG YOU CLAIMED ORANGE SCUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM /VOTE" with the guise of looking town.
Which is also somewhat my reasoning for the reck votes that accumulated shortly after your analysis calling reck SK.
Fate wrote:If Kdub is defscum why are we jumping off him again? Because you lost interest?
Maybe I had your playtsyle down wrong... I for one only back off people if they sound townish NOT even if other people act scummy as well
readingWhat I said wrote:recent posts don't look particularly townish or anything but i kinda lost interest and wanted to do something different
knowing my luckthis means kdub is defscum but starbuck hate is cool too
For reasons I don't feel comfortable explaining, I think I have a fairly confident Town read on him in spite of him being on both wagons.Katsuki wrote:@Vi: Skimming right now, but it was kdub, xvart and tans who jumped on spyspy.
Aka, two of our beloved scum.
What are your thoughts on xvart?
The thought has crossed my mind, BUT we'll find that out more easily when the alliance gets picked apart at Night than just speculating about it now.xvart wrote:As an aside, and to be fair the following comment should be taken with a grain of salt, but I am starting to ponder the idea that the people in this game that love to be in alliances (capslock or otherwise) get some sort of thrill of being in cahoots with others, so I wouldn't hold it against them to want to be officially in cahoots with others and therefore select to be scum. Something to think about.
I'm more willing to vote Kdub than tanstalas, so have it your way.Guderian wrote:Where Did i indicate I was NOT interested in a tans wagon? If this wagon loses all total steam, maybe, but its post like that one ^^^^ (your 479) that make it lose steam by getting people off it. I like my vote where it is.
Okay, NOW your reading comprehension is on par with Fate's.Plus you seem to call him(...) def scum
Except the chances of her posting "stuff" are fairly low. Plus this behavior p.much looks like what she did as neutral/scum/etc. in Death Note Mafia.Well on your request, Iosed starbuck. Nonsense coming from her right now really. I think this is a convenient wagon because all she has done is post flavor instead of anything. I mean, that isnt protown, but neither has a lot of other people been. I dont see it as wagon worthy unless the point is to get her to contribute. This wagon will probably dissipate when she stars posting stuff.
I'll help out by reminding people that in addition to playing like scum, she also claimed to like being scum and in this game she could choose her alignment.Jack wrote:Interesting that some people seem to have no idea what a large part of the starbuck wagon is about.fos:katsuki
MoI in particular explained very well why you're scum based on something similar to this accusation. Also, presumably your offsite experience would preclude a "join date" argument, because you've been playing there longer and apparently you're still getting hit by these accusations.Guderian wrote:In EACH large theme game I have played (an one or two in other places) a whole host of people have jumped on me for posting shit like this, often containing the same words I hear here 'fluff' 'defensive' 'stupid posts'. Ok, If you think I am scum, make something out of it.
I decided to humor you and look for why you would say this.xRx 590 wrote:Starbuck is town and voting her is a waste of time.
That question was there specifically to get an answer out of Jack.MagnaofIllusion wrote:The only way to tell is to actually implement it. Based on your comments about assumptions not holding am I to assume you do not support it?Vi wrote:Correction: Would it work?
1) is fine. I actually did consider a method that would be better than a full color claim, BUT again if the setup isn't 4s across the board it won't work. Plus without people like Kast around it's dubious anyway.SensFan is scum because
1) Breaking is a total waste of time. The fiiiirst thing you should be doing when you create a game like this one is make sure massclaim doesn't break to stupid, obvious ideas. Yeah, maybe there's some obscure way to crack this, but there's NO WAY RC didn't foresee D1/D2/Dwhatever color claiming. Trying to this is just going to either mean 1) we accomplish nothing or 2) we get punished for it because we THINK we broke it, but we didn't and we shoot ourselves in the foot.
2) The fact that he is saying we need to break INSTEAD OF SCUMHUNTING is such a god awful plan I don't even know what to say. What happens when it tanks? We sit around and say, "cool, we just wasted the whole day, now let's quickwagon someone so we don't no-lynch?"
I'm pretty sure that's how the scum want to play, yes...SpyreX 640 wrote:(As a side note with 3 non-town kills I'd love to debate the idea of abandoning all hope and being just scummy enough to not get lynched so the crossfire goes up)
No you're not, although I'd like to believe xvart is Town.SpyreX 672 wrote:Am I out of my mind in regards to that whole morass of Jack, KK, Xvart being more than a little off in SpyreX,tsk,tsk ESPECIALLY with Toogeee's showing that it wasn't just Sens but others who did the same thing?
SpyreX: You implied npiau is Town, Y/NKast in the signup thread wrote:/in but won't be very active until 10th of Jan.
ITT MoI doesn't even look at the argument against where his vote should be. But we already know my thoughts on this.MagnaofIllusion wrote:Hey look pointless spam ... thanks so much guys
Actually, I have to disagree with the last part of that.AlSo Vi TyPiNg In AlTeRnAtInG cApS iS sLiGhTlY oBnOxIoUs AnD wE aRe NoT oBnOxIoUs.
I think I remember seeing an Open game like that somewhere, where the scum won if they were all lynched and Town won if they were all NKd.SpyreX wrote:Well, yea, but what I meant is that'd be how town would want to roll if possible to drive scum early looking town and eating kills. It's like bizarro-mafia.Vi wrote:I'm pretty sure that's how the scum want to play, yes...
Starbuck is saying sheThe mods didn't specifically state (as far as I read) in the sign up thread as to which colors would be town and which wouldn't be.
If you know the flavor of Blackest Night and the Green Lantern series, you already know this information.
Perusing Wikipedia, this is accurate - as long as they aren't attacking each other, the rainbow corps do have a common target in the Black group.Starbuck 210 wrote:In Blackest Night, the bad guys are the Black Lantern Corps. Yellow and Red kinda of war with each other throughout different eras.
I was just in this kitchen. What more do you want?xRECKONERx wrote:Vi, get in here.
Given that she's in the US military in Europe, I wouldSHE IS THE TOWNS.Or at the very least, she isn't red scum.
I dedicated a giant post to this a few hours ago. Read it.Andrius wrote:How do you mean Vi gets Starbuck? I'm confused as to how she can't be scum.
Pressuring at this point in D1 is kind of useless because it takes 12 votes to get people close to a lynch.Yeah, dram is a chronic lurker. He can have one of those slots. I'm a tad hesitant because the last time I declared dramonic as scum he flipped town.
They are under the radar but they're not doing much to get OUT. I bet if we pressure them hard they'll show their true colors.
1) That doesn't answer the question.Kublai Khan wrote:1*Like a hyperactive disobedient dog, I'm just ignoring them for now.Vi (678) {Numbering mine} wrote:KK 676 -
1*The CAPS LAWCK bunch is quite distinct if you don't paint the members with a wide brush. Why would you say otherwise
2*You're going to have to explain - for the last time - what this SpyreX hate is about.
3*[advicedog]SEE ISOLATED INCIDENT | CREATE SWEEPING REFORMS[/advicedog] Get over yourself.
4*I'm half tempted to suggest AlTeRnAtInG cApS just to see what would happen
2*I don't hate SpyreX. But his dancing around instead of giving a straight answer just keeps him looking scummy. Explanation later, but overall do you think that in this setup, those who are more strongly SK-hunting are more likely to be scum?
3*C'mon now. No small text should be on every mod's ruleset. Even if it's just jokey stuff.
4*You're only suggesting that because there's a 50% chance of your name being capitalized wrong, and not the wrong way you hate.
Sure.You've called me scum three times and now I have to demand an explanation/case from you. "By default" doesn't cut it.Vi (764) wrote:MoI and KK are scum essentially by default,
I'm sorry, I don't see this information anywhere in the modposts. Do continue along these lines.KK #11 wrote:The reason I bring this up and overall want to stop blind color claiming is that we have to remember that this is Black Lantern Mafia and not Lantern Corps Mafia. Losing one's ring doesn't not necessarily result in death and I'm theorizing that it's possible to be "found" by other rings/factions. And I'm sure Nekron is involved somewhere/somehow. Probably as a cult mechanic.
Pretty much.Eh, don't bring up XABC. I played very badly as I distracted by something IRL that made mafia take a backseat.
Also, what's that logic again? I love being scum so much that I betrayed my scumpartners and tried for a third partyish WC?
Excuse me if I don't take your word for it. Is there anything that supports this?I hate being scum. And this is my second game back from a year-long absence from mafia. I picked town/town.
Yes. Maybe. I'd like to buy a vowel.Plum wrote:Vi: No.
The more I think about it, the more it wouldn't work. The idea was to have just one color claim and work with each color.Plum wrote:Regarding Day1 color claim, I'm skittish even though it doesn't look like we have anything to lose that we can put a finger on. Call me conservative, but . . . and yet I doubt that the punishment factor, assuming there is one, would be strong enough to screw us over and I doubt we'd be in much worse position compared to now. Oh dammit. I'm doubtful that there is a major major downside, maybe just say screw it and go for it. Or, better yet, ask about Vi's idea. Vi, you had an idea for an alternative to colors-claim?
So you're apparently reading Reck's posts but not mine?Toogeloo wrote:I may throw my vote down on Star, but I would like to clear the air surrounding the matter before I commit. Reck states that he knows Star is town, and Vi apparently caught on as to why. Is there any reason to keep this from the rest of us? I don't care if Reck says it or Vi says it, but Star's lynch is a very good possibility, and if information pertaining to the lynch is helpful in stirring in the right direction, it should be brought to the attention of everyone and not just a select few who have the possibility of coming back tomorrow with something like, "I told you she was town."
The reason is basically "lol, Jack".I still haven't, and I'm pretty sure I asked, seen a reason why "I'm copy-pasting stuff" = "not for hot, sweet death"
That's... an interesting interpretation of what I pointed out. I actually said that she had no idea who the scum were, even though she could at least GET an idea through reading the modpost and it would be too obvious to miss if she were scum and noticed that her team was all the same color. Based on this IToogeloo wrote:Are you trying to confuse me? The link you posted at appeared that you were trying to post that Star didn't look good because she knew the scum despite saying she didn't know what colors she was choosing when she signed up, or something to that effect >_> ...Vi wrote:?Toogeloo wrote:Vi showed that he also didn't care as much about Star in light of Reck's commentary, I have no qualms laying it down.
When I stated you agreed with Reck about Star meta, you told me I didn't read your posts.
So were you correcting me, or telling me that I was right for the wrong reasons, or something else all together?
Maybe you could just lay it down for me.
Vi, do you think Star is scum? Simple yes or no please >_>.
I'm pretty sure that's par for the course as well.Until then lol, Jack is going to piss me off.
If you're offering.Andrius wrote:Vi: Is this you asking for Jack-scum meta?
Note: This hasn't been true for a while precisely because of issues like accidentally being logged in as each other.Starbuck wrote:I'm also not liking you harping on Reck and dramonic. I'm sure it's already been mentioned but Plum and her sister play games together too. It's the same thing. I trust that they don't discuss games outside of the thread.
Only for ongoing games. There are rules about "not bringing outside wagers, etc. into the game" but never mind that.I'm also not a fan of using information from outside the game. Isn't there a rule on MS about that?
Not necessarily. I know Xyl in particular refused to read games he replaced into, and didn't seem to be worse off for it.Toogeloo wrote:FoS for not reading the game seems pretty good to me actually >_>.
Wouldn't that be some of the worst anti-town behavior you can display?
We have enough information at this point, I think. At this point it's basically the Fate+Kat show intermixed with people complaining about Fate and Kat and general not-going-anywhere. There is already a wide variety of information about most players in the game.people wanting to end the day earlier and let power take over also makes me uncomfortable. I like my Day 1s, and I really don't like seeing them end early. They provide the most interaction between players than you will find anywhere else in the game. I want the most reads I can get as well going into the night.
He's not.Starbuck wrote:I'm not feeling to keen on[MoI]being town.
Remember, it's pronounced "Ahmgus".Kublai Khan wrote:Lordy, lordy, we're all in trouble because Vi is likely-scum in this game.
Oh, so it's WIFOMGUS. My mistake.Kublai Khan wrote:It's not OMGUS. Your case is default/meta/fail. My case is gut.Vi wrote:Remember, it's pronounced "Ahmgus".Kublai Khan wrote:Lordy, lordy, we're all in trouble because Vi is likely-scum in this game.
It also ignores things like
*how it's no secret that I prefer to be Town
*how if I'm scum, I'm actually NOT a likely threat in this game because of how quickly I'll get killed
...danakillsu wrote:And this is really why we made MoI bulletproof. Who wants Black Dead N1?
One of these things is NOT like the others.ReaperCharlie wrote:- It's quite hard for town to win this game. They have to do extremely well overall to pull this off.
- It's very hard for Red and Yellow to win this game. Mostly due to color-claiming.
- It's swingy for Orange to win this game. He had a good chance and did well, but it didn't work out.
- It could have been much easier for Black to dominate this game, they just had some bad luck.
No.ReaperCharlie wrote:It's just failure to blackhunt on everyone else's part that is making it so easy for them to win.
I'm glad someone's keeping that meme alive.*Advice Dog pic*
But that assumes that killing scum was the only thing necessary for a town win. <-- and look how ridiculous that sounds, too.
Dare I ask how? Fewer scum becoming obvious from the Night actions, thus increasing the chance of a Town lynch?ReaperCharlie wrote:1. When there are 10 scum in a 25-player game, lynching scum is significantly easier than in a 3-3-18 setup. Especially given the poor play of the entire red team, which we didn't count on being compromised all in one day. We also expected their godfather not to be the first one lynched, due to the nature of his investigation immunity. One might even imply that their implosion was a catalyst for the game swinging the way it did.
*Secret Cult2. How do you suggest we had nerfed the cult, Vi?
So freaking what?!If we had not given the bulletproof to Magna, the faction integral to the flavor/surprise would have died N1.
so what3. The ways we DID nerf the cult were that they couldn't recruit the scum team leaders,
so what (many games don't let you recruit scum)they couldn't talk to any scum they'd recruited (though the scum's wincon would have changed to the cult wincon, and the cult would have been informed of their new member),
You're underestimating what kind of power is involved in recruitment. Heavily. And you played Supernatural Mafia.and last and certainly not least, everyone who they recruited lost any role abilities they had.
I think you're contradicting that quote I put up earlier about this being a difficult Town game...4. I'm not saying we're blameless at all, but I AM saying that this was quite a swingy setup, and it could have EASILY swung another way. Town had a veritable sh*tload of power, mason recruiters, cops, roles-that-weren't-supposed-to-be-used-as-cops-but-were-held-by-Andrius-so-they-were-used-as-cops-anyway, and a ton of other cultsplosion-mitigating factors.
I'm biased against someone I called out D1 (and didn't retract).5. You are giving absolutely no credit to Magna for an extremely well-played game. His avoidance of guilt was fantastic, his recruitment choices were fantastic, and his endgame was fantastic.