Open 272 - Near-Vanilla (Over!)

[Chaotic Neutrality]

Confirm

[Chaotic Neutrality]

unvote, vote: nacho

for being the second person to be the second person on a wagon.

VOTE: Smashbro for being ridiculous.

[Chaotic Neutrality]

chaotic neutrality confirmed 2nd scum

I confirmed 4th.

[Chaotic Neutrality]

1st

/confirm

2nd

/confirm
2nd

3rd

Confirm

4th

Confirm

chaotic neutrality confirmed 2nd scum

Your argument is invalid

[Chaotic Neutrality]

what?
he said 'confirmed 2nd scum'
people with some interlect like me would understand why he said that

That can be taken to mean any number of things, depending on how you read it. I read it as "CN confirmed 2nd. Scum!". You and farside read it as "CN

is

confirmed

as

2nd scum". This has to do with the psychology of how people interpret written word, not "interlect".

vote antb

3rd scum

Reasons are your friend. Please don't forget your friends.

I'm fascinated more by those ignoring brokens point about scum delaying confirming to give more time to talk

The town could still talk during pre-game. There is nothing that Nacho (or anyone) could possibly do to stunt conversation. Broken's point is flawed.

I don't know if CN is one of those people that will have me hitting my head on my desk or if he is trying to make something more then it is.

My vote was a deliberate attempt to vote someone who hadn't been voted for. For all intents and purposes it is a random vote.

No jokes bub this is serious business.

More votes on nacho please.

Pushing a lynch on the 2nd page without exceptionally good reason is extremely anti-town.

I never said CN confirmed 2nd, just that he is the confirmed 2nd scum, I may have phrased that poorly.

Very poorly... seems like a complete cover-up.

UNVOTE: JesseSheffield
VOTE: brokenscraps

Drawing very poor conclusions to anti-town behavior is scummy. There are some legitimate reasons to vote broken. This is not one of them. It appears you saw something you thought as scummy and made up your reasoning, as opposed to explaining why you thought he was scummy. That's a very newbish scum slip I regret to inform you.

UNVOTE: VOTE: AntB

[Chaotic Neutrality]

Obviously read as

"Confirmed as 2nd scum"

Not obvious.

Picking on someone's typo is a scum tell?

So voting on something which to me reads as a cover-up to a particularly nasty slip is a scum slip in itself?

No, and no. There is no scumslip there in either interpretation of what broken said. I'm voting you because your reasoning is made up. It's formulated. You're not giving us reasons, you're feeding us reasons. This has nothing to do with your silly "broken is trying to cover up his scumslip" conspiracy.

[Chaotic Neutrality]

1) I'm a sarcatic person. Also, people seem to take notice of sarcastic comments more for some reason...

[sarcasm]It's really, really easy to read sarcasm without tags.[/sarcasm]

[Chaotic Neutrality]

How about we concentrate less on the amusing ambiguities a lack of punctuation can produce and more on the fact that you have completely made up some nasty scum slip which you haven't properly explained and are using that as the justification for a vote.

VOTE: AntB

If you're going to reason the way you have this game you're going to get voted, your case making is currently ranging from poor to scummy.

This. To those of you paying attention, AntB is fairly obvious scum.

VOTE: AntB
(my reasoning is in my other post. I forgot to accompany it with a vote)

[Chaotic Neutrality]

@Mod:

I'm requesting replacement. Something's come up in my personal life.