Because I keep thinking of that
Hi everyone I've already met, hi everyone I haven't met, and hi everyone I may have met while reading games.
Shh! I'm huntin' wabbits.Andrius wrote:Who, if I may ask?
And you need to vote vezok if you haven't already.
Vi hasn't updated the first post, so I can't really tell; however, it looks like we got a NK after all.Kitoari wrote:Not sure I understand.Equinox wrote:Wait. What the fuck? "Attempted the impossible"?
DOES THIS MEAN WHAT I THINK IT MEANS.
VOTE: Guderian
Wagon, go go go.
Yeah, that's what's stumping me at the moment. I don't think Rhinox would've bitten a zeusbolt so early, though, even if we consider the fact that the battery power was converted.Magua wrote:I don't think "attempted the impossible" is straight up flavor kill (I expect that is either "corrupted", from Holy Orders, or "shot", given the flavor in the OP).
But it's undeniable that Rhinox is dead, and the only way that makes sense to me right now is a NK.mothrax wrote:Yeah, according to the OP he "Might as well Be Walking on the Sun."
it doesn't sound like factional kill...
Pedit: @gud: yes, what I have read of/interacted with jack he does something like this a lot. That and if his rep is true he is not the type of player to make such a blatant slip d1 under that little (read 0) pressure.
Okay, okay, I'll stop. Watching you squirm was entertaining, though.Guderian wrote:Equi, using little hearts and winky faces wont make your strange reasoning appear any less strange. If your vote is serious, explain, if its not, dont act like it is.
What made you think we were going to continue?RayFrost wrote:Hi guys, I disapprove of quick lynching. The faith given to seraphs is great and all, but they won't be able touse their freaking powersif we lynch before they send in a PM, just like all the other players that aren't on during this that have powers. This isn't a good strategy since it's essentially random lynching and putting all the faith in the seraphs (hehehehe, puntastic).
I promote a less random, willy nilly approach. Like actually playing mafia. Who knows, it might be a good idea.
Nice strawman.Guderian wrote:So if someone does something ridiculous/ scummy, we should put them down as town because scum would 'proofread their posts?' Yeah, no.
Ah, that's what you meant. Fair warning, then, I guess.RayFrost wrote:Equi - I must've misread the multiple quickvotes after day two started as going for a fast lynch again.
Why point out one's mistake even MORE by correcting it? Wouldn't it be better to cross your fingers and hope nobody sees it?Guderian wrote:And his very next post is a correction to his previous, corresponding to your theory that he was scum, reread it, albeit after he posted, thought 'shit son' and the edited by way of post.
Day 1 ended in a policy lynch with no chance to do Day 1 read acquisition shenanigans. We actually need votes.RayFrost wrote:Voting when virtually nobody's posted? Yah, no thanks. See yah, for real this time.
You are correct.Kitoari wrote:I can't help but read this post as "I think this guy is scum, but I'm gonna go vote this guy instead".
Kitoari wrote:Not liking gude very much atm. That being said Jack's slip is a slip no matter what way you spin it.
I'm conflicted between the two atm.
Okay, so I assumed -- your reasoning the second time was identical to the first time, and I can't see the first vote being anything but an RVS vote. If it is serious, then explain, please?Magua wrote:Who said my first vote was random or arbitrary?
Actually, I think they've been rather clear about their cases against you.Guderian wrote:Have no fear to start making sense.
All right, fair enough.Magua wrote:It is serious, but it is not based on anything that has occurred in this game.
Hmm... What do you think of Guderian's suspicion/vote of Jack in post 69, then?Kitoari wrote:Guderian is scummier than Jack.
What I was trying to say is that the slip is bad and not an indication of towniness, but I eventually decided after I posted that post that gude was scummier.
You called Guderian town for his move earlier today, though; what changed?inHimshallibe wrote:Equinox was the first to point this out, and so he is the only one that gets the credit for it. Sorry Guderian, day late and a dollar short and all.Equinox wrote:Did I just see a slip on page 1? Coolio.
I see what you're saying, but none of the other possibilities I've considered make any logical sense, and I really don't want to wait until Day 3. It's more of a "note to self" exercise than anything, so it won't be my sole focus for today. This thread is more interesting, anyway.Magua wrote:Re: RhinoX. Trying to clear people based on the nightkill submission is a pointless exercise until you know if "attempted the impossible" is NK flavor or not, because that totally reverses where the suspicion falls. I still don't think it's NK flavor, FWIW.
I thought about this whole Guderian thing while driving. I have a conclusion, but I want to see Guderian's next post before I reveal.Equinox wrote:Having trouble deciding whether Guderian's frustration is town-anger or scum-anger (but it is genuine, though). Will sleep on this. Opinions and stuff welcome.
I was more interested in your statement that "scum voting after Andy" was a risky move. I thought that voting after it's clear a policy quicklynch was on the agenda would be less risky... so I'm trying to see your train of thought here.In post 295, Baby Spice wrote:I was expressing some doubts about whether Andy was town or not for specifically calling for a quick lynch (Actually just before there), and really I'm unsure because it's such a loud "look at me" type of post/vote.Equinox wrote:Eek. IoA. Do not want.
I don't follow. Can you elaborate on this, please?Baby Spice wrote:Scum voting after Andy seems risky, reguardless of Andy's alignment.
It seems to me that the next vote would have attracted a decent amount of attention too, and so would be less likely to be a scum vote.
Especially with Mothrax's vote being delivered the way it was.
It felt like he was trying to hook into Andy's quick lynch push but being free to claim he wasn't.
Can't tell at the moment. (If you're interested in reading material, Zachtown in the Mountains.)RayFrost wrote:Is spice playing like she did as scum? I can probably find a town game with relative ease to read, but knowing scum-meta will quicken the process for me as well.
And, just as I'm ready to start, I realize how utterly fruitless an expedition this would be. The only thing I'd get out of it would be, "Oh, hey, one of these XX people are the scum." Yeeeah, so useful. >_<Equinox wrote:I see what you're saying, but none of the other possibilities I've considered make any logical sense, and I really don't want to wait until Day 3. It's more of a "note to self" exercise than anything, so it won't be my sole focus for today. This thread is more interesting, anyway.Magua wrote:Re: RhinoX. Trying to clear people based on the nightkill submission is a pointless exercise until you know if "attempted the impossible" is NK flavor or not, because that totally reverses where the suspicion falls. I still don't think it's NK flavor, FWIW.
Now I see where you were going. Hmm... Okay.Baby Spice wrote:That's why I think the quick lynch was pushed by scum. But I really felt that Andy was genuine town in doing it. Hence voting Mothrax who subtly cited quick lynching as part of his vote.
I thought about that, but it's impossible to definitively tell who could have sent in an action because the scum may have stayed off the quick lynch entirely, and not everyone has public online status. Basically, we're still at square one (but with reads from people's behaviors and stuff).singersigner wrote:Plus, it really told us a lot about who was online posting, as far as potential scumz needing to send in a kill at that time.
Since Baby Spice couldn't answer, I will. It's a ballsy move for scum; pushing a policy lynch is difficult, and usually there's somebody out there who will go bug-eyed and scream, "OMGZ HE'S PUSHING AN EASY LYNCH DIESCUMDIE." It's more likely that scum would join an already established policy lynch than propose one themselves.singersigner wrote:How exactly did you read Andrius as genuine town pushing the QL?
YES I DID.Nachomamma8 wrote:EQUINOX YOU NEVER SAID HI TO ME ((
Someone mentioned that Guderian wasn't too happy with Fate's style before. How did he react then, and did he react while in the game?Andrius wrote:He is abrasive; something he isn't as town. (PYP4)
What sort of answer were you looking for, and how would scum answer differently from town?Empking wrote:It was incredibly uncomitted.
That makes it pretty obvious that RayFrost wasn't pushing the quick lynch thing "multiple" times.RayFrost wrote:Post for Andrius that I was typing before equi posted:
...how is this not obvious?Empking wrote:Edit; RayFrost, how many "streams" have you posted in? When did that stream end?
AGar doesn't strike me as the kind of guy who would lurk like this as scum, even considering the circumstances. I second (probably just an nth at this point) the demand for AGar-posting, though.Magua wrote:And although I was joking (mostly) when I said that Agar drew scum again in this game, I'm becoming more serious about that. He's active on site in other games, which means he's actively avoiding this one.
Check the sign-up thread.Nachomamma8 wrote:It was highly depersonalized though
Your question to singersigner sounded like, "You're playing better than last time, and you can't even tell! You must be scum!" That sounds ridiculously paranoid to me, and if singersigner is town she may hesitate to play at her best. It makes me antsy.Empking wrote:Equinox: What is "planting seeds of doubt"?
RayFrost's terminology and pattern of posting seem fairly obvious to me. I don't know what the problem is.Empking wrote:Well because bananas cause the rollerskate (OR because Rayfrost just made up a term and I'm not privy to his inner most thoughts.
[...]
Reading the post Equinox posts now.
Join us and kill Kitoari!RayFrost wrote:I'm deciding whether I want mothrax or kitoari or gud to die today. I think they all need to die, but it's a matter ofwhich one needs to die first.
No. Read Kitoari's link.AGar wrote:Quicklynch D1. Oy vey. At least you could have chosen Furcolow...
Gut. No. Gut.VasudeVa wrote:This is odd. Why? Do you think Katsuki is Town? What makes my vote wrong?Equuus NEIIGHH. NEEEIIIGHHHH wrote:I do not approve of VasudeVa's vote on Katsuki.
Kitoari wrote:Thank you Vi for sparing me in my infinite stupidity.
In other news, I figured that only a recent game could incite this much RAEG, so I went and found this.
VEZOK VERY MUCH DIE NOW
UNVOTE: VOTE: vezokpiraka
Get well soon!Kitoari wrote:See sig, it's changed again - I'm sick as a dog and I don't have the energy top put into this game, and it's showing with my play.
Seriously?Furcolow wrote:into an "omg guys, i might lurk, but I have an excuse"
Furcolow wrote:I would support either of their lynches to see the alignment of the other
Furcolow wrote:Scum trying to get a lynch on Jack for something is hilarious here
Explain.Furcolow wrote:Scum:
Jack #22
Andrius wrote:WAIT ARE YOU THE [REDACTED- NEAR-PROFANE] WHO COMPLAINED ABOUT THE CAPS?!?Guderian wrote:To be honest, if you think people respect you because you post in caps, you're wrong. If you think you're cool because you can act loud and obnoxious, you're wrong. If you think you're mighty or superior, you're wrong. Play civilly, play to have fun, play with respect or just dont play.
I UNDERSTAND, FATE.
Equinox wrote:Someone mentioned that Guderian wasn't too happy with Fate's style before. How did he react then, and did he react while in the game?Andrius wrote:He is abrasive; something he isn't as town. (PYP4)