Workdawg, post #29
Just because people like jumping off bridges for silly reasons, doesn't mean I want to jump of a bridge for that reason...
I RVS'd when I had a different silly reason to do so.
Fair enough, I can see some bits of crazy logic here.
TP42, post #31
Makes sense. Looks like I was wrong.
Chalk it up as newbie reasoning.
Okay, a retract... Normally, I would think it's a null-tell, but that bolded part doesn't sit well with me. It is up to me, whether to decide if it's a newbie mistake, or an attempt to cover up a scum screw-up.
Ty, post #35
This entire post is full of theories that aren't really relevant to the scumhunting, unless that first paragraph was an attack on nacho, and/or it has some hidden, deeper meaning. Lot's of words, almost zero content. Another candidate for a politician. Me not like... Also,
Hey Angry Scientist, could you explain why you don’t think there will be any scumhunting today? If you don’t believe there is going to be why shouldn’t you start?
I never said anything like that, and I don't even know how can you get your conclusion out of what I said. I said that unless you're a clairvoyant or Sherlock Holmes, you won't really get a solid reasoning out of RVS, so we need to 'drill'. By 'drilling', I meant using small reasons to accuse someone most suspicious, and then cement the case/scrap it and go for someone more suspicious as the post are piling up. I didn't say anything about no scumhunting today. About your second question, Why thank you, that's what am I doing since the very beginning - questions, catches. It already helped me by providing some reads (for example, my vote on TP42 is no longer an RVS vote since my last questioning).
And yes, Stels is scum. Based on the game so far, provide me with a reason that would support that statement.
Okay...
At the time of your question, I got nothing, since he just RVS'd and made a note about the vote code. Now? That part I mentioned from his last post seems like a Freudian slip to me, and that's why he's a scum.
TP42, post #37
That's yet another time you're mentioning your previous game to use it as a point. One game is not enough for a proper meta read. Not exactly a scum tell, but I'm not going to buy any 'because in my last game...' explanation. Using metagame is fine, but if you have more examples to back it up.
Neuky, post #38
OK, for the record I think Mute's table idea is a bit hair brained, but hey, if it keeps him happy, why not just let him do it?
Amen. People are making much more fuss about it than it's necessary. At least it provides some additional reads.
Mute, post #40
@Nacho/Stels/Angry: What is your input, if anything at all, to what's happened so far?
It's pretty much stated in my posts so far. TP42 seems scummy to me for things he said, and that weird statement added to his retract. Also, 'In my last game' used as an ultimate point pings on my gutdar, so my vote stays on him. Ty talked a lot (in post length, not the numbers) but didn't add anything useful at all so far, so he lands as a suspect #2. Stels takes the third spot for his Freudian slip.
nacho, post #43
@Mute: Might I request that you post your table either all at once or none at all? Being able to request specific reads on people might help townies see what your opinion on others is, yes, but scum will most likely use it to gauge the statuses of their scumbuddies. For the town, there's rarely such a thing as too much information.
I disagree. What does a townie gets from someone else town and neutral reads? Almost nothing (the only thing I can come up with is 'why does he feel that X is town, when I don't think otherwise'). What does the mafia gain from that? Some serious help with picking the target for the night kills. Cons outweigh the pros as far as I can see here.
