Nocmen wrote:
Internet Stranger:
Votes Xaxle for the claim suggestion
Votes Olinea thinking that she detonated.
Blames Olinea for setting up Furc with the kill - Where did this idea come from? I can't find the link from Olinea to Furc regarding either of them being the possible detonator.
I do like his attacks though on Dana, seems very in line with someone who is questioning and actively scanning for scum.
I don't like his mentions of Furc though. I feel that it is likely IS is a partner with Furc.
Has actively focused on both SC and Xalxe. I don't like that he focuses so much on these people. Since his attack on Dana, I feel that he's tunneled a bit too much on 3/4 people.
I'm keeping my vote on IS for now, but I'm definitely curious to see Xalxe's response.
crap crap crap crap, Nice try painting me with a broad scumbrush. You make decent cases on the other two scumbags, a weaksauce case on me, but yet I warrant a vote?
Youre bringing up OLD points that have since changed once new information came out.
Im still on Xalxe for several reasons that have been brought out and explained to death by several people (Including you)
I left Olinea alone once the whole issue of the detonation was sorted out.
I thought Furc was just another unreadable VI full of nonsense. Oh gawd, if Furc was on my scumteam I would have steamrolled him so he wouldnt take me down with him. Otherwise, I normally ignore the VIs assuming that someone else will get rid of them early on in the game. (See: Chesskid, Cooldog, Furcolow)
When was the last time I even mentioned SC? That Day2 ended so fast we barely got to discuss anything.
And the case on Dana was directly tied to Olinea detonating.
Essentially, you have nothing, except my meta of ignoring the VI's like Furcolow.
Am I tunneling, FUCK YEA I AM, I think XALXE is SCUM. Of course im going to tunnel on him.