Mini 1137: Long Overdue Mafia [Game Over!]

Xalxe · Post Post #2 (isolation #0) » Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:22 pm

My con is quite firm, thanks for asking.

Xalxe · Post Post #12 (isolation #1) » Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:33 am

VOTE: neil1113

Not a serious vote. Please just get an avatar (plus I don't think votes count this early).

Xalxe · Post Post #16 (isolation #2) » Tue Mar 08, 2011 5:27 am

UNVOTE: /UNVOTE:
VOTE: Rhinox

Modlynch FTW!

(Please note that this will stop the instant the game starts fo' realz.

Xalxe · Post Post #20 (isolation #3) » Tue Mar 08, 2011 9:15 am

Voting for the mod = joke

Xalxe · Post Post #33 (isolation #4) » Wed Mar 09, 2011 1:25 am

Okay, now that the game's started...I wish I had a mad plan to whip out. But I don't.

VOTE: Idiotking for the last-to-confirm scumtell.

Xalxe · Post Post #41 (isolation #5) » Wed Mar 09, 2011 3:24 am

Dammit, there goes the Modlynch for today

Xalxe · Post Post #45 (isolation #6) » Wed Mar 09, 2011 6:03 am

Jahudo, how many does it take to lynch?

UNVOTE: Idiotking

D'oh I knew I'd forget something. It's 7 to lynch right now, and that information will be included in VC's from now on.

Xalxe · Post Post #49 (isolation #7) » Wed Mar 09, 2011 7:19 am

neil, please don't answer questions that aren't for you. And thanks mod, but that wasn't the intention.

Xalxe · Post Post #52 (isolation #8) » Wed Mar 09, 2011 7:27 am

Whee, belated OMGUS. This is a fun game already.

Xalxe · Post Post #56 (isolation #9) » Wed Mar 09, 2011 11:41 am

Cecily wrote:I guess we should get things moving.
I'd like to ask some questions, just because we can't stay in RVS forever unfortunately.
1. When are you most likely to be posting?
2. How would you describe your play style?

1) All day really. I have comp access during the week almost constantly; weekends are more busy, but I'll get posts in.
2) For the most part, I comment on things as they happen. I'll quote one post, make a comment and leave. Wall-o-texts aren't my style.

Xalxe · Post Post #60 (isolation #10) » Wed Mar 09, 2011 3:07 pm

Idiotking wrote:
P.T. Barnum wrote:I'll mostly be posting in the evening EST. I enjoy brevity.

Vote Idiotking
. Wagon.
IK wrote:For trying to distance himself from Jahudo.
How so?
It was a quasi-joke. It is, however, odd how he jumped off of my wagon when Jahudo joined it, as if he thought I was near a lynch already.

Heh. Heh. ITT I fail at math; I honestly thought you were within idiotscum (not to be confused with idiotking) quickhammah range. Plus it was a random vote anyway, and we've got a bit more info now.

Xalxe · Post Post #68 (isolation #11) » Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:24 am

andrew94 wrote:
Xalxe wrote:neil, please don't answer questions that aren't for you. And thanks mod, but that wasn't the intention.
why/
because you wanted jahudo to answer your question and thus seem to be doing something?

Yes. That was precisely the idea.

P.T. Barnum wrote:
Xalxe wrote: Heh. Heh. ITT I fail at math; I honestly thought you were within idiotscum (not to be confused with idiotking) quickhammah range. Plus it was a random vote anyway, and we've got a bit more info now.
1. How could you have possibly thought that he was in lynch-range? That sounds suspiciously bad at counting.
2. What does "idiotscum quickhammah range?" mean exactly?

This goes to both you and Jahudo:

First off, I thought this was 6 to lynch, so sorry about that. Second, I wouldn't say three scum is out of the question. Third, with three votes and three potential non-scum on, plus the presence of several...sub-par players in this game, I was worried, that's all. I didn't want a Random Voting Lynch.

Xalxe · Post Post #104 (isolation #12) » Sat Mar 12, 2011 2:11 am

WOAH

WOAH

WHAT JUST HAPPENED?

Okay, seriously? 1) Why would you use a one-shot daycop this early?

2) Why voided?

3) Why haven't I kept up with this game?

Xalxe · Post Post #111 (isolation #13) » Sat Mar 12, 2011 5:42 am

I agree with Cecily. I think this claim has put us in a weird position, but there are really only a few options today.

Option 1: Lynch voidedmafia today

If he's scum, pappums is both clear and an obv nightkill target.
If he's town, pappums is the D2 lynch.

Option 2: Lynch pappums rat today

If he's scum, voided is most likely town, unless this is a fucking brilliant gambit.
If he's town one-shot cop, voided is mafia.
If he's vanilla town, he's a moron.

Option 3: Lynch somebody else scummy

If pappums is legit one-shot cop and voided is mafia, scum have to keep him alive or out voided as mafia.
If both are town, pappums dies, voided is mislynched.
If both are scum...???

To me, the best plan appears to be a voided lynch, as we're more likely to catch scums. VOTE: voidedmafia

Xalxe · Post Post #114 (isolation #14) » Sat Mar 12, 2011 6:02 am

Voidedmafia wrote:Xalxe: Well, for the first option, you're a little wrong since this is a "one-shot" day cop. So, after this, he's practically useless for anything other than being a townie.

But a CONFIRMED townie.

Xalxe · Post Post #123 (isolation #15) » Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:42 am

Voidedmafia wrote:
Jinxx wrote:
Voidedmafia wrote:Why is that? Your only reason for voting me is demolished now that I'm more active (and quite honestly, it was still somewhat in RVS, which is why I wasn't really contributing)
You may be active, but you aren't really... saying anything. Also, GUT.
Neither are you. Also, GUT FEELING I'M TOWN AND RAT'S SCUM.

...gosh, really? I never would've guessed that. I mean really, who disagrees with the person who calls them scum?

Point is, make effort besides stating the obvious. You're probably getting strung up anyway, but on the off chance you're town, we'd like some help going into tomorrow.

Xalxe · Post Post #126 (isolation #16) » Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:00 am

dammit lost the post

Anyway, my top 2 would be you and pappums obv obv, my #3 would actually be PT Barnum for this nugget:

P.T. Barnum wrote:I'll mostly be posting in the evening EST. I enjoy brevity.

Vote Idiotking
. Wagon.
IK wrote:For trying to distance himself from Jahudo.
How so?

Where he tries to defend me, which, quite honestly, bothers me.

Xalxe · Post Post #128 (isolation #17) » Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:03 am

Voidedmafia wrote:Why does it bother you that he's defending you? You think he's buddying you or trying to cover up something?

The first, yes. I think that if he were ever to turn up scum, that's an easy way to say ZOMG XALXE PARTNER LYNCHLYNCHLYNCH.

Xalxe · Post Post #130 (isolation #18) » Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:07 am

Nope, pappums' claim. That's it, but it's certainly an issue that can't be avoided.

Xalxe · Post Post #143 (isolation #19) » Sat Mar 12, 2011 3:47 pm

OKAY STOP

pappums, why aren't we lynching your guilty again? Please, please don't tell me you're gambiting.

Xalxe · Post Post #145 (isolation #20) » Sat Mar 12, 2011 4:49 pm

pappums: Lynching you is/was an option where we believe you are liarscum, so we lynch you to test. Obviously this is sub-optimal.

Also, voided's defense is...better than I expected, actually. He hasn't laid down without a fight.

Xalxe · Post Post #172 (isolation #21) » Mon Mar 14, 2011 12:25 am

andrew, voided is right. Why is neil scummy?

Xalxe · Post Post #177 (isolation #22) » Mon Mar 14, 2011 8:48 am

...

jeez pappums, and here I thought we had a scum wrapped up 100%. Now it's only, like 50% or so.

My reaction: pappums is town. If he were scumgambiting, he would have no reason not to let the wagon run its course and then claim "lol insane cop my bad lololololol." So yeah.

Voided...is iffy, I really need to reread his postings.

Also, UNVOTE: Voidedmafia

Xalxe · Post Post #189 (isolation #23) » Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:27 pm

neil1113 wrote:Woah... I don't like the lying from Pappums, and I don't like people "clearing him" because he made a gutsy move. I've made a lot of gutsy moves and played scum that way before, and people cleared me for almost the identical purpose. So Pappums is in no way clearing in my book. However, I don't like Fitz either, for scummy play and reasons I've already posted. Also:

Why on earth am I coming off scummy to you Andrews? And whoever else called me scummy, please either post your case, if you have one, or do some ACTUAL scum hunting. That'd be great.

neil, I get your point, but explain to me why pappums benefits from this gambit AND coming out with it now as scum. Please.

Xalxe · Post Post #191 (isolation #24) » Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:56 pm

Okay, pappums is scum. Why would he reveal that is was a gambit now?

Essential, I want you to argue against this:

Xalxe wrote: My reaction: pappums is town. If he were scumgambiting, he would have no reason not to let the wagon run its course and then claim "lol insane cop my bad lololololol." So yeah.

Xalxe · Post Post #202 (isolation #25) » Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:21 am

neil1113 wrote:Xalxe, your argument seems to be "it's TOO scummy to actually be a scum move." That's a fallacy, and it's one you (if you're town) need to be VERY careful to avoid. It's not town oriented, and you can't possibly clear him because "he did such a stupid, anti-town move that he can't possibly actually be scum (anti-town)." As scum in my previous games, there's been certain instances where I SPECIFICALLY did something (like completely push for a day 1 lynch on one of my partners who wasn't active at all that game) that if you thought about it, there's no way I being scum would actually do it. But I did, and I did it to bring out that exact reaction. The town bought onto it, and I rode my way to a victory. Don't be so close minded to do it this time with him, Xalxe.

No, my argument is that there is no scum motivation. Rather the opposite of what you're arguing.

Voidedmafia wrote:Quite frankly, I'm ticked off (or pissed, if you don't mind that) that andrew has so far made nearly no sense whatsoever in his posts. The only two that made any amount sense recently are the post asking me to claim, and the post that says that neighborizers aren't always town-aligned.

If he'd try to make sense with this case against you, then I wouldn't be so up about it.

PROTIP: andrew94 is what we folks refer to as a Village Idiot (VI). Easy vig-target please.

Xalxe · Post Post #220 (isolation #26) » Tue Mar 15, 2011 2:02 pm

P.T. Barnum wrote: For that reason, I think Jahudo is wrong to assume the scum were dying to jump on voided's wagon
if
they knew voided was town. Smart scum would let town do the work for them and stay off any townie wagon.

I don't think that's necessarily true in this case. Scum could easily hop on the wagon and then say "lol I followed the cop, not my fault!" I get that usually, but in this case I think it's null at best.