There Will Be Bloodshed (Game Over)

[Jerbs]

Vote: Pine

As said by everyone else

[Parama]

Jerbs is scum with Pine.

[Pine]

Ahh. Jumping on wagons without stating your own, independent reasons is scummy when Jerbs does it, but pro-Town when Parama does it. Note that this is completely in-line with my original reasons for voting for Parama on D1.

[Parama]

Vote: Pine

He's scum

...I am stunned and impressed by your concise and well-considered post, Jerbs. Bravo.

Most awkward scum-scum interaction I've seen in a while. Props to you two. d(''d)

easons I think Pine is scum (I'll back off him because of what Calcifer said tho)

This pretext is hilarious. "HERE'S MY CASE, EVEN THOUGH I'M NOT GONNA KEEP PUSHING IT!"

I say we let Pine live today, as Calcifer seems so sure he's town.

Uh... and?

I think pine is scum, but lets follow what Calc said.

There is literally only one other explanation for this, but I don't exactly want to even hint at it atm.

Vote: Pine

As said by everyone else

What about "As said by me, Jerbs, yesterday"?

[Pine]

You're aware that your last point contradicts some of your others?

[Parama]

The last point is implying that he completely forgot he posted a case on you, and he'd only forget that if he didn't actually care about lynching you.

[Hiraki]

Hmmzorz. Parama makes Jerbs look a bit worse than I anticipated.

Here's my case on why Cal should die.

My bad, I thought I’d get back in time for the deadline. Anyway, there will be no mistakes here. Let’s go through Calicfer’s ISO.

#1.

First, I want the reasons.

#2.

Why did you ask that question on Page 2? Did you really have that much to say either?

#3.

Do it. I want the reasons now. IMO, I kind of want the reasons more than before hearing that.

#4.

Hmmzorz. While that ramble to Pine was an interesting read, I’m going to use your logic against you now. Is that all you have to say?

#5 is stupid, can apply the same logic as above.

#6 is good, but I don’t want to talk about it.

#7 is juicy. To note, ICE made a very sarcastic post before about meta being able to lynch Town, rather than Scum. He even used smilies!

However, Calicifer voted him, rather than his scumreads from Page 1. Something isn’t really fitting here.

#8. Juicy too.

Let me get this straight. As a hydra, you two are not working together very well. Especially when one comes in the middle of the game and starts talking about missing RVS. It actually got really awkward for me doing this at this point, wondering if I could say anything about this post because it’s so outdated.

We’ll skip the next two to #11.

First, why should I trust you?

The flurry of 14-18 gets me pretty annoyed too. I don’t care if you think Pine is town, I just need some reasoning please. Also, just because someone votes someone that you think is town, doesn’t necessarily mean that they’re scum.
Getting onto 21, Calicifer still doesn’t acknowledge why Pine is confirmed town. He’s pushed it to the point where he hasn’t given any reasoning but just some easy targets, and some random targets. Scumlists help us to what you’re thinking, but will never give us the why.

#24 is where I became done with this bull. I want the reasonings and I want them now.

Also, you blatantly lied about your Friend case. According to the votals, he was on Silver most of the game. Perhaps there’s stuff in between, but I’m doubtful. This is basically why you’re scum. Also he was on Pine. Did that instigate you?

[Calcifer]

So your entire case on us is that
1) We play like crackheads.
2) We don't give reasoning.

Is there an other significant points we're missing?

[Romanus]

Calcifer, you voted for Friend, twice, when your vote was already on him. Explanation please.

I'm really not feeling this Pine lynch, like at all. I get the feeling that the Pine lynch was decided yesterday and is a very easy wagon for Scum. Voting for him today, based on yesterday's reasoning is not pro-town. No townie should be on Pine right now. Can't you see how easy that makes it for scum to hide?

Come on guys, we have to be better than this.

However, I am down with a Parama wagon. I can give reasons, but mainly it has to do with the voting record from yesterday. Don't really want to say any more than that atm.

Vote: Parama

[Hiraki]

So your entire case on us is that
1) We play like crackheads.
2) We don't give reasoning.

Is there an other significant points we're missing?

Nope. That's all. But it's to the consistency that you're above giving reason, and you can declare scum and town because it is. That's much more scum driven then town driven scumhunting.

[Romanus]

Wraith and Jerbs are my other top scum reads.

[AGar]

Braiinnnsss

[Romanus]

Jerbs is scum with Pine.

Well played Parama. Point the finger at an easy D2 lynch and your scum buddy. Can't be blamed for the former and will be exonerated for the latter.

It almost worked.

[Parama]

xD

Vote: Parama

Wraith and Jerbs are my other top scum reads.

Well played Romanus. Point the finger at an easy D2 lynch and your scum buddy. Can't be blamed for the former and will be exonerated for the latter.
It almost worked.

Only difference is that I'm NEVER an easy lynch, but you get the picture. 3 down, guys. This is great.

[Romanus]

And it is certainly not townie behavior to misquote someone without pointing out that you did so.

[Parama]

I changed one word. Jesus Christ, you're reaching.

[Pine]

But why'd you do it at all?

The way I see it, Parama, you make a habit of misrepresenting whoever you see as vulnerable, ignoring anything that contradicts your premise, and trying as hard as you can to skim others' reasons, distill them, and present them as your own in an effort to win their support. And when anyone appears to be honestly scumhunting or willing to declare support or condemnation for someone you disagree with, you go ahead and paint them blackly too.

All that is remarkably scummy, and I'm surprised that only I saw it in Day One. Though I'm not surprised that a replacement, who read the thread without preconceived notions, saw what I did.

[Parama]

I changed "Parama" to "Romanus" to show how hypocritical Romanus was being.
And I'm not misinterpreting anything. Scum will lie, and I'm just exposing the truth.

[silverbullet999]

-Hiraki
Your big whole word document was just that half a page... really...

[Antihero]

But why'd you do it at all?

The way I see it, Parama, you make a habit of misrepresenting whoever you see as vulnerable, ignoring anything that contradicts your premise, and trying as hard as you can to skim others' reasons, distill them, and present them as your own in an effort to win their support. And when anyone appears to be honestly scumhunting or willing to declare support or condemnation for someone you disagree with, you go ahead and paint them blackly too.

All that is remarkably scummy, and I'm surprised that only I saw it in Day One. Though I'm not surprised that a replacement, who read the thread without preconceived notions, saw what I did.

Not a scumtell. It's just a flaw in playstyle.

Wraith and Jerbs are my other top scum reads.

Rationale for Jerbs would be awesome.

[Romanus]

I will correct myself: It is anti-town behavior to misquote people. It does not help town and can hurt the town to do such things. Fine, chalk it up to playstyle. My previous point stands. And as you pointed out, Parama, your logic is flawed as you are not THE easy D2 lynch. Also, I pointed out 3 scum.

There is no comparison to what you said and what I said. More convinced now than ever.

[Romanus]

As I stated earlier, my scum reads are based on Day 1 voting record.

[Pine]

d(''d)

What in the hell is this supposed to mean? I've seen you use it twice now.

[Parama]

(b'')b don't be hatin d(''d)

[Antihero]

d(''d)

What in the hell is this supposed to mean? I've seen you use it twice now.

Hint: the quotation marks are eyes and the d's are hands.