Friend wrote:GreyICE, I don't really understand your complaint against me. It's not like I've been posting silverbullet-level fluff everywhere, and I'm not an aggressive, dickish player.
Lemme see if I can summarize my complaint easily. I'm going to do a bit of a quote wall, but there's a reason.
I'm going to separate your posts into three different categories.
1) Vaguely making other people look suspicious
2) Asking questions that you never follow up or post reasons for
3) Buddying
I'll then post any anomalies after.
Vague Suspicion
Friend wrote:But Pine, none of these votes are truly random - you're making a conscious decision to vote who you want to vote for.
Pine definitely seems like he's trying too hard (and I concur with the lack of wall-reading). That sarcastic response wasn't good either.
DLG does too but I've played with him before and that might just be his meta. I just think it's hypocritical to call people out for not offering anything when all he's done is tell people to offer things.
Friend wrote:Oh, and bad in a poor play way, with a hint of scumminess.
(about DLG)
Friend wrote:ConfidAnon's vote for AGar after this game has only been going on for about a day is troubling to me, especially after the tossed-away THB vote.
Friend wrote:unvote: DLG
vote: ConfidAnon
My vote seems better placed here.
Cookie, I didn't like what AGar said - AGar wasn't lurking. It had been one day. He voted for AGar for lurking. It doesn't add up.
Blatant sheeping of another case. Oh wait, AGar didn't make a case. He posted a lazy rallying call in the thread to 'start a wagon.' You went "Okay, sounds like a good idea!"
Questions with little/no followup
Friend wrote:Pine, why don't you like random voting stages when you're implying that you can gain information out of these "not-so-innocent" votes?
Cookie, what do you mean by weak?
Buddying
Friend wrote:Also, hi everyone I know and everyone I don't. Looking forward to awesomeness.
Friend wrote:Oh my god, thank you.
TwoHeadedBoy wrote:Grey voting NL is a nulltell, btw.
~Pie
Agree with this by the way. I don't think pacman's vote is good at all.
With a note that it belongs in suspicion too.
Other
Friend wrote:C-Worl, can you get an avatar? It makes it easier for everyone to recognize you.
Friend wrote:DLG, Cookie.
Friend wrote:Meh.
I still think my vote for DLG is solid.
(Response to my vote... how is his case on DLG solid? It doesn't exist)
Friend wrote:Getting a huge newbtown vibe from C-Worl.
(Very safe 'designated town read')
I don't need aggressiveness. What I want is interaction, and you're just floating.