Mini1147-Royal Mafia at the Round Table (Game Over!)
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
Let me put this out there: Go to sleep. Get up. Go to school. Go to hockey practice. Walk home.Javert wrote:
Highly experienced.Klazam Post 21 wrote: Hey all, how much experience do you have?
Vote: Prosaurus. Last to confirm, and already lurking. Scumbag in the bag.
Fixed.
It takes a while
I can tell. This will be a looooooooong game for me.[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
Only real post I see (Contains more than fluff). Don't find it scummy. BTW, what's IGMEOU? Can't find it on the wiki.Twistedspoon wrote:
yeah, thought it was IGMEOUJuls wrote: I think it was IGMEOU = I got my eye on u. Having trouble entering the conversation twisted? How do you feel about the interactions between ender/erathos? me/farside? rhinox/oso?
just seemed strange since I read EGMEOU twice
nevermind though
as for oso I see nothing particularly odd as of yet. I thought that He justified his reason and gave a counter-argument to support it. However I do realise that it isn't the strongest of finds from Oso, especially since it's so early in the game. It's a null tell for Oso, ender and erathos in my opinion
it's nice to see players like Rhinox and yourself are alert and reading carefully though. That's always a good sign. Like I say, the sooner RVS end the better
In the RVS, this is scummy how? I'm pretty new, please explain this.Erratus Apathos wrote:OMG, neil obviously gave himself the best role! SHENANIGANS!
Ender tells us to "have no fear". Having no fear in this game is tantamount to letting your guard down. Why do you want us to let our guard down, Ender?ender241 wrote:Have no fear! Ender's here! VOTE: neil obvscum
VOTE: ender241[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
No. That's my way of saying "There will be 18 ~ 21 hours each day where I won't be able to post". Unless of course it's the weekend.Rhinox wrote:
Pretty sure Javert was just joking to make a RVS vote. Are you paranoid?Prosaurus wrote:
Let me put this out there: Go to sleep. Get up. Go to school. Go to hockey practice. Walk home.Javert wrote:
Highly experienced.Klazam Post 21 wrote: Hey all, how much experience do you have?
Vote: Prosaurus. Last to confirm, and already lurking. Scumbag in the bag.
Fixed.
It takes a while
I can tell. This will be a looooooooong game for me.
I did pretty much skim. But that was of TS's posts I read, the rest were pretty much fluff, so I was wondering how he seemed so scummy to some people.Rhinox wrote:
Did you just skim? There were real posts before this one that contained more than fluff. Why single this one out to sort of randomly say you don't find it scummy? What don't you find scummy?Prosaurus wrote:
Only real post I see (Contains more than fluff). Don't find it scummy. BTW, what's IGMEOU? Can't find it on the wiki.Twistedspoon wrote:
yeah, thought it was IGMEOUJuls wrote: I think it was IGMEOU = I got my eye on u. Having trouble entering the conversation twisted? How do you feel about the interactions between ender/erathos? me/farside? rhinox/oso?
just seemed strange since I read EGMEOU twice
nevermind though
as for oso I see nothing particularly odd as of yet. I thought that He justified his reason and gave a counter-argument to support it. However I do realise that it isn't the strongest of finds from Oso, especially since it's so early in the game. It's a null tell for Oso, ender and erathos in my opinion
it's nice to see players like Rhinox and yourself are alert and reading carefully though. That's always a good sign. Like I say, the sooner RVS end the better
IGMEOU = I've got my eye on you. Just an expression of suspicion, not a wiki acronym like WIFOM, OMGUS, etc.[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
No, not at all. I was just 3 pages behind, so I skimmed them. I'm not going to do that often.farside22 wrote: Prosaurus: How do you expect to find scum if your skimming the thread? Have you played mafia online before? Is this your first game on MS?[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
PS: Just did a proper read. But, due to my lack of experience/skill, I'm lacking reads on anyone.
About Oso, I don't see anything he did as scummy. Answering questions before they're asked is in no way scummy to me, it just saves posts really.[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
Agreed.Javert wrote:Unvote: Prosaurus, Vote: ender241.
No read on Prosaurus. In fact, I don't have a read on much of anyone. All of the questions in this game so far seem like attempts to squeeze blood from a turnip.Juls, Post 89 wrote:Javert - How do you feel about prosaurus now that he is no longer "lurking"?
@Juls I wouldn't vote. Why vote for some random person, possibly getting them lynched, without a reason?[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
I was pretty much thinking the same thing.ender241 wrote:Oso wrote:
That would be Ender. Part of the reason is pretty much a carbon copy of what Javert said when he answered. So I'll just quote that because it says what I was going to say and uses many less words.Juls wrote:Oso - Other than Errastus, whom do you see as scummy?
Which is exactly what I got out of Ender's as opposed to Erratus's vote. Erratus is saying Prosaurus is using the newb card to justify confusion "You need to start playing the game", Ender is accusing him of actively using the newb card to defelct suspicion.Javert wrote:1.) I voted ender241 for Post 91. First, it is almost verbatim to Erratus Apathos' post, Post 90. But it has a subtle difference: while Erratus Apathos correctly pointed out that Prosaurus was more using his "newb card" to defend why he was not getting reads on players, ender241 instead claimed the "newb card" was being played in order to "get out of situations where he is going to be voted." I definitely do not get that impression from Prosaurus' post, and I think it is an overblown attack on the "newb card."
In additon, since Javert's claim,
First bold.ender241 [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2933307#p2933307]Post-117[/url] wrote:..
Just vote him already godamnit!He's trying it on, it's like saying "I'm the bomb, the last person to vote me so i am lynched will die." Which is basically warning us off voting for him so he gets away with doing what he wants and noone can stop him,he can't kill all of us."He is trying it on...", implies he thinks it not true. Second bold"...he can't kill all of us."Not 100% confirmation that he knows Javert is actually a Day-Vig but 100% confirmation in my mind he knows Javert is town.
Reference that with Ender's- Post-113:Start answering questions, i doubt your a DayVig.
- Post-114:Basically your using "Day-vig" as your excuse to say what you want.
"...he can't kill all of us."is pretty much smoking gun confirmation that EnderKNOWSJavert is town and most probably telling the exact truth about his role.
So you can the question in my last post Ender for the rest of the thread if you want. I'm no longer concerned with the answer though.
UNVOTE: Erratus Apathos
VOTE: ender241
You have misinterpreted what i'm saying, i'm saying he's either doing one of three things.
1. He is scum and basically trying to make himself stay alive for ages.
2. He's just a normally townie who's got himself into a sticky situation.
3. He's a DayVig and just a total dick who can't be assed posting and is just being a total dick about the whole game.
Thats what i'm trying to say, i don't want dicks in the game.
I don't mind being Day Killed,
VOTE: Javert[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
So are you a cop or scum?ender241 wrote:Oso, what i dislike is the fact that he says he is going to kill today. If you want to DayVig you should wait until we have pretty much confirmed scum.I'll find out what he is tonight.UNVOTE: VOTE: Necessary Evil stop lurking, start posting.
And is there a reason why I should care about being Day Killed? I don't see one.[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
Because when he did it, he pretty much said he'd shoot whoever it was that put him at L-1 (Or hammered him if he can shoot in twilight.) So people wouldn't vote to avoid being Day Killed.Oso wrote:
It's not inherently needed for me personally.Maxous wrote:I don't fully understand what you mean by "hang the vigkill over the head of a player"
I'm not saying we should put someone at L-1 now but it won't exactly be a disaster if Javert does'nt get an opportunity to shoot today. If a scum self-hammers..we have gotten rid of a mafia member. Happy days.
If used correctly it will be useful but we don't absolutly need it.I can't see any reason at all why scum would claim day-vig.It didn't make any sense to me when he made the claim that he might be scum doing it and when I thought on it, it still doesn't.
Javert has said that he does want to take a shot today. Granted, if we L-1 scum and they self-vote to prevent the shot, that's still good. 1 scum down.
Since I believe the claim, I can't see how it hurts us at all to not L-1 a player that is on his way to claim as it allows us to do both. Pressure before lynch/prevent the day from ending unexpectedly.
I'd have a problem doing that with someone under no or little pressure but in Ender's case, he's at L-2. You (I think it was you Maxous) indicated you were willing to vote but didn't want to L-1 him just yet.
If someone else indicated a willingness to vote Ender that could be read as the L-1 vote (you) and Hammer (other player). In that case, "hanging the vig kill over a player's head" has the same effect as an L-1 vote/Hammer imminent combo.
Why ask? Ifender241 wrote:ender241 wrote:Do you guys want me to claim?
Again, i am willing to claim but only if required to. So do you guys want me too???youwant to claim, then claim. It seems you want to.[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
Here's a tip: Don't. First of all, him using his kill today would be enough proof. Secondly, He'll probably be night killed because of his claim.ender241 wrote:Sadly, i can only use it at night. Because i am going for Javert investigation, would it be safe to say that i would only be killed if Javert was scum? Or would the scum just kill me anyway to make Javert look suspicious.?
I see no reason to investigate him unless his day kill is not used as promised.[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
1) I was pointing out his soft claim.Rhinox wrote: @Prosaurus: Why did you ask ender to claim in post 197?
-----------------------
These 2 posts make me sad for mafiascum.Prosaurus wrote:
Here's a tip: Don't. First of all, him using his kill today would be enough proof. Secondly, He'll probably be night killed because of his claim.ender241 wrote:Sadly, i can only use it at night. Because i am going for Javert investigation, would it be safe to say that i would only be killed if Javert was scum? Or would the scum just kill me anyway to make Javert look suspicious.?
I see no reason to investigate him unless his day kill is not used as promised.
----------------------
2) Why may I ask?[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
Heh. You come back right when we're thinking of day vigging you. Perfect timing?Klazam wrote:I'm here.
/end procrasination
I promise that i'm reading the game now, and will post ASAP
@EA You seem to be defending Ender alot. Mind to post your main reasons you think he's town?[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
1) Why? He's doing about as much as I am.Rhinox wrote:
Agreed.I suggest we park a noose around Twistedscum's neck.
---
@Maxous: PATIENCE! lets take care of obv scum twistedspoon first, then we can work out which one of {Javert, Oso, farside22, Me=Weird, Necessary Evil} were scum on the easy to wagon ender. EA and ender are both town btw.
---
Question for you - why do the actions you are accusing EA and ender of make them scummy? In my experience, those things are not really things I see scum partners do, like, ever.
2) EA+Ender+Rhinox seem to be banding together. 3 people. Hmmmmm...
3) If they are both scum, maybe they'd do that because they know it's uncommon and won't be suspected.[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
Why thank you. Though I am new, you can see I've only had two games.ender241 wrote:I don't know why, but i have a good feeling Prosaurus is scum. I have no reason for this so i will not vote him though but i am noting that because if i get one of those in another game then i can detect scum.
@Prosaurus - I find it interesting that earlier you said you were a newbie, your playing alot better than a newbie you know?
And why not?Erratus Apathos wrote:
Cause his angry reaction to Javert's claim is totally legitimate, and it's not how scum would react to that claim.Prosaurus wrote:@EA You seem to be defending Ender alot. Mind to post your main reasons you think he's town?
Huh? Can explain this clearer? Only thing wrong with that timeline I see is the first post says 2005.Oso wrote: SCUM FOUND
Post-146:02 April 2005
Post-201:04 April 2011Me=Weird wrote:..
Javert, is your day vig 1-shot?
..
Post-248:07 April 2011ender241 wrote:Alright my role is.... One-shot cop.
Time line is WAY, WAY screwed up there.Me=Weird wrote:..
Out of all the things in this game, you think what you perceive to be role-fishing to be the scummiest stuff in the game? Look, I can think of at least one reason for asking that off the top of my head. A doctor trying to figure out whether to protect a vig, which if not 1-shot, would be the best thing to do, or a 1-shot cop, when a 1-shot vig has already used his bullet.
When M=W asked Javert about being a 1-shot, ender hadn't claimed yet. That he tries to counter Klazam's role-fish accusation by using a "Helping a possible Doc decide between a 1-shot Cop and a used up Vig." scenario, well....that stinks.
Role clarification, trying to get the claimant(Javert) to contradict himself on role abilities, seeing if the claimant will balk at a full role reveal...those are all decent pro-town reasons to ask what M=W did.
That he justifies asking the question when called out on it by using evidence in the thread that wasn't there when he asked the question is not.
VOTE: Me=Weird
We've just been lied to folks. The "one reason off the top of my head" that M=E used to justify the question just doesn't hold water.
Well I'd say I have learntfarside22 wrote:Pro - newb town - ugh so many things I want to say and put my IC hat on about.
First voting even anyone for any reason is good. It brings discussion and if someone hammers for no reason during the first few pages they are more likely scum.
Hence voting someone even during RVS is a good thing for info.
Pointing out a soft claim helps scum.
Seeing Javert respond to the same most makes me cringe if Javert is town as I see more scum motivation then town for pointing out the soft claim.
Also I have a question for you. Juls states you are in another game have you learned nothing on how to scum hunt or things that sound off/scummy or seen anything in this game that you see that feels or reads off?
Your 3rd point in your last point is a good start, it's more theory then anything but expand more.
Anyways reading Pro I read someone a bit lost.somethingbut it sounds like I didn't learnt much.
Back to read more soon.[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
Should probably ask me that as well. EA and Ender defend each other and gang up on me. Then Rhinox defends them. I'd say that's scummy.Oso wrote:Also:@Maxous."There is something off between Rhinox, Erratus and Ender."Gut? Or do you have references you can use to at least give us an idea of why you think the interactions between the three are off.[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
@Juls Why vote Maxous? Any reasons you can tell us?
And it's about time I put my vote somewhere: VOTE: Erratus Apathos
Ender has claimed a PR, so we shouldn't lynch him if we think scumteam is EA Ender and Rhinox.
EA was most suspicious otherwise.[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
@MW Well I think so, and I think Maxous said it as well. Ender is included because, he might not be scum but I think he is. If he isn't scum, then he's a 1-shot cop. I'd rather vote for someone who either hasn't claimed or claimed VT than someone who claimed a PR.[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
Actually, risking being dayviggedErratus Apathos wrote:I don't care about TS's claim, he's still scum. "But his claim is consistent with this one remark he said earlier on about one-shots!" So? It's not like scum are incapable of being consistent, and I see no reason for this instance to be any different. My vote stays where it is.
Scum would know the claim is true, and would want to steer the dayvig away from him and his buddies rather than challenge it and risk being vigged.Prosaurus wrote:
And why not?Erratus Apathos wrote:
Cause his angry reaction to Javert's claim is totally legitimate, and it's not how scum would react to that claim.Prosaurus wrote:@EA You seem to be defending Ender alot. Mind to post your main reasons you think he's town?wouldsteer the day vig away from them and their buddies.
Here, PS is playing the newbie card, asking for people to give opinions instead of actually giving one.[/quote]Me=Weird wrote:@Javert 309: 1. In addition, ender had done what I saw to be scummy, but I'd also had a gut town feel from his posts. I thought he acted scummier than the town feel, so I attacked him anyway. Plus, he seemed pretty eager to claim, the way a PR would.javert wrote:I do not like this post. This is a pretty bad justification for asking me the number of shots in my role.
What do you want me to do about that?
[quote="PS "Tell me what to do!" #1"]In the RVS, this is scummy how? I'm pretty new, please explain this.
Wondering how on earth something is scummy makes me scummy?
Hint: Content is good. Fluff is not content. Fluff is scummy.[/quote]Me=Weird wrote: [quote="PS "Tell me what to do" #2"]I did pretty much skim. But that was of TS's posts I read, the rest were pretty much fluff, so I was wondering how he seemed so scummy to some people.
Not always.
No opinions. It's a lot easier for town to have suspicions than scum, because scum would have to fake it. Second line just looks like filler to me.[/quote]Me=Weird wrote: [quote="PS "Tell me what to do" #3"]PS: Just did a proper read. But, due to my lack of experience/skill, I'm lacking reads on anyone.
About Oso, I don't see anything he did as scummy. Answering questions before they're asked is in no way scummy to me, it just saves posts really.
Well sorree Mr "I have so much experience"/
I don't think this was in RVS.Me=Weird wrote:
Because of course, we wouldn't lynch that person. We do it until there's a reaction, causing us to exit RVS.PS wrote:@Juls I wouldn't vote. Why vote for some random person, possibly getting them lynched, without a reason?
In my only two other games, people who cared about being killed were lynched beacause "Only scum care about surviving"Me=Weird wrote:
…Because you'd be dead? It would reduce the numbers of your faction? This could be scum trying not to get killed by acting like they wouldn't care.PS wrote:And is there a reason why I should care about being Day Killed? I don't see one.
You're saying scum are dumber than me? And I'm pretty sure I wasn't the only one who said that.Me=Weird wrote:
You have no idea how much I face-palmed when I first read this. Why on earth would you say this? It just points it out to any scum who might not have noticed, and if he hadn't had to claim, this would be awful. I read that as more of, "is this untrue, or are you a PR I can kill?"PS wrote:So are you a cop or scum?
I didn't know that still someone (NE I think) told me that.Me=Weird wrote:
Hint: Read posts. Active lurking is way different from not posting.PS not reading wrote:I haven't actually. I have more of a life than being on Mafia 24/7.
Well I took it that way.Me=Weird wrote:
He said nothing of the sort. If that were why he claimed, then why did he do it with such little suspicions on him?PS lying wrote:Because when he did it, he pretty much said he'd shoot whoever it was that put him at L-1 (Or hammered him if he can shoot in twilight.) So people wouldn't vote to avoid being Day Killed.
Yeah... Or he could be scum lurking for as long as possible.Me=Weird wrote:
Opportunistic scum? IIRC, he just got prodded.PS wrote:Heh. You come back right when we're thinking of day vigging you. Perfect timing?
Actually I think I put reasoning in an earlier post, but didn't vote.Me=Weird wrote:
Did you read your own post? In the same one where you ask for reasoning, you make a vote without reasoning.PS wrote:@Juls Why vote Maxous? Any reasons you can tell us?
…
EA was most suspicious otherwise.
Yeah...Me=Weird wrote: With this in addition to gut,
Unvote, Vote: Prosaurus[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
*Sigh*Me=Weird wrote:
Except that it doesn't look like that so much as wondering what the popular opinion is.PS wrote:Wondering how on earth something is scummy makes me scummy?
Is it now? I think I can tell the difference between an important post and fluff.Me=Weird wrote:
When isn't it? Fluff is posting nothing relevant, which is taking up space, which is trying to make your post seem bigger and more important.PS wrote:Not always.
If we were in LyLo, I'd have enough evidence to choose someone.Me=Weird wrote:
So it wasn't. It meant that you would rather no-lynch, and, depending on whether it's LyLo, lose the game.PS wrote:I don't think this was in RVS.
Yes, but without the acting. Seriously, if I said I didn't want to die because I'd lose, you'd think I was scum. EA seems to think the exact opposite to you on this matter.Me=Weird wrote:
So you're saying "In other games, people who cared about dying got lynched, so I'm going to act like I don't care, so I don't get lynched"?PS wrote:In my only two other games, people who cared about being killed were lynched beacause "Only scum care about surviving"
Well if I point it out to (Dumb) scum who didn't notice... and of course only the easiest target's going to be noticed, and of course no one else is suspicious because you didn't notice. Suuuure.Me=Weird wrote:
Where am I saying that? And whether or not other people said that doesn't make it better. Anyway, you're the only one who said that and got noticed.PS wrote:You're saying scum are dumber than me? And I'm pretty sure I wasn't the only one who said that.
I do hate oxymorons, don't you?Me=Weird wrote:
So read. Think. "Why would he say active if he's accusing me of lurking? Maybe he's saying something else!"PS wrote:I didn't know that still someone (NE I think) told me that.
That "I WILL shoot before I'm lynched, and I don't like people who lynch me" attitude.Me=Weird wrote:
What did he say that possibly could have given you that impression?PS wrote:Well I took it that way.
We ARE talking about Klaz, right?Me=Weird wrote:
So I looked, and it wasn't him who was prodded. He'd last posted only a day ago. That's not exactly "as long as possible".PS wrote:Yeah... Or he could be scum lurking for as long as possible.
Post 301, right before the vote.What did farside post, and where?Me=Weird wrote:
Where? And even if you did, so did farside.PS wrote:Actually I think I put reasoning in an earlier post, but didn't vote.
What emotional reaction?Me=Weird wrote: Emotional reaction noted. Happy with my vote.
It sounds like you should talk to EA, he seems to think the exact opposite to you.[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
So you're giving up your case?Me=Weird wrote:@PS: I'm not going to go through and respond to every response. As for your questions, go look at the klazam post you were talking about in ISO, and look at the post directly before it. For the other one, maybe if you'd read her response to that, you'd know.[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
And post Post 361 scream scum to me. Mostly the bold, in 361 he's just failing at scumhunting, like scum are said to do, he's too experienced to be newbtown. I also find it odd how Oso agrees with his reads(Post 369).Klazam wrote:Javert-hold off on vigging if your target is me.Let me make a few posts first. All right?
Everyone- I have been reading the game, but I'm having a hard time actually posting. If you all would prefer it, i can replace out.
My vote on PS is because I find PS scummy, along with his rolefishing, yes.
Right now, I'm really finding it difficult to read EA.
@Ender
Hard question. I think EA, Ender(You) and Rhinox could be a scum team, but Klaz is being very scummy as well. I'll wait and see what happens.[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
Klazam wrote:I didnt want to be vigged before i could have some input. Is that so wrong?
And "too experienced": actually, no. I dont have that much experience.
Yes, you do. Stop trying to play the newb card, you're too experienced for that.Klazam/Games Wiki Page wrote:Newbie 1050
Open 288
Open 285
Newbie 1065
Mini Normal 1133
Mini Theme 1139
Open 290
...
Post383 K, Understood.
I dislike EA's "They ARE scum, no doubt about it" thing. Besides, didn't you think Klaz was scum?
As for my theory about EA+Ender+Rhinox, I reckon EA and Rhinox could possibly still be scum, who dragged town into their plan. That however, doesn't seem like a likely concept. VOTE: Klazam because of generally bad scumhunting, previous lurking, and playing the newb card when he has plenty of experience.[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
Please. Your case seems weak, and you're much too eager to lynch someone. First Klaz, now Oso.Erratus Apathos wrote:Oso wrote:Beingwillingto believe the claims
LOL. YOU BELIEVE THE CLAIMS AND ARE SUSPICIOUS OF THE PLAYERS MAKING THE CLAIMS.Oso wrote:whilestill being highly suspicious of the players making the claims.AT THE SAME TIME.
THAT MAKES NEGATIVE INFINITY SENSE.
DIE SCUM DIE![Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
Not yet. But maybe you should learn to read properly? He's willing to believe the claims while he wasn't sure they actuallyErratus Apathos wrote:YOU'RE RIGHT, PROSAURUS. LYING IS A WEAK SCUMTELL AT BEST. ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO TEACH ME ABOUT THIS GAME?aretrue, he didn't say "OMG CLAIMS THEY ARE TRUE BUT THEY ARENT TRUE RIGHT?"
@TS Ender is confirmed because he's dead and the mod posted his role.
@Maxous *FACEPALM*
EA is all "THEY MUST BE SCUM BECAUSE I THINK THEY MAY HAVE POSSIBLY LIED. LET'S LYNCH THEM!" instead of my "They seem very scummy, therefore I'm voting for them". Thereisa difference.
@Klazam I thought I played horribly in my first game, but it doesn't matter. I learnt, so it should count.
Saying "I don't have much experience" when defending yourself is, infact, the newb card.
To do an EA style response:Rhinox wrote:EA: Why is Oso more scum than TS or Klazam?I noticed you've used the same type of argument style in addressing all 3 of them. Each time it comes across as being super sure you found scum.Do you think all 3 are scum? and how certain as a rough percent for each?
THANK YOU
THANK YOU
THANK YOU
THANK YOU
THANK YOU
THANK YOU
THANK YOU
THANK YOU
THANK YOU
THANK YOU
Think about this.Dictionary.com wrote:Willing: Ready, eager, or prepared to do something.
Hmmm... This will be considered.Erratus Apathos wrote:I'm not absolutely sure, I just like playing in overdrive. It's more fun that way.
Top 3 scum suspects now:
1.Klazam
2.EA
3.???Last edited by neil1113 on Fri Apr 15, 2011 1:29 am, edited 1 time in total.[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
*Sigh*
He thinks they're scummy. But they claimed PRs, and if they're truthful like Ender, it's better to lynch someone else. Therefore, he'swillingto believe their claims, incase they're truthful like Ender. But they still seem scummy. Get it?
Oso, this is what you meant, right? Or should I be agreeing with EA?[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
And that's why I think they're scum. You all say it's too risky for scum to claim masons. Then you say they can't be scum because of it. Therefore, it's actually not very risky at all.Twistedspoon wrote:prosaurus and Oso are wildcards for me today. I'll give them a pass
The masons are forever unlynchable until proven otherwise
Javert gets a pass for the unlikelihood of a scum day vig in a mini normal. However I want to see him post again
NE and MW are the only remainders that i don't have town reads on. I'll live with one of their lynches today. I might later switch to him if his lynch becomes more feasible, but I'll stick with NE for the timebeing
@TS Yeah, I'm still happy with my vote.
Welcome to Quilford, Read fast and post to let us know you're here.[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
And the other two people?Erratus Apathos wrote:Seriously, we're making MW claim? This town is headdesk city.
Oso is scum for:Prosaurus wrote:How exactly are you so sure he's scum? Same for the others you think are scum.
believing Ender and TS's claims for no real reason
pushing a no-lynch for crap reasons
and then not having a town reaction to my attack on him
It's mostly the reactions I quoted above. Although voting Oso also helpsfarside22 wrote:EA: How or what defines for you MW as town besides that one post? I say lack of scum hunting and BWing is more likely to come from scum.
What lack of scumhunting? Looking at MW's iso, I see plenty of scumhunting.[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
The thing is, if we choose the townie first, scum have the upper hand. It'd be:
D1 10Town 3Scum (Lose 3 town)
D2 7Town 3Scum (Lose 2 town)
D3 5Town 3Scum (Lose 1 town, 1 Scum)
D4 4Town 2Scum.
Unless of course we have a doctor. If we get scum first:
D2 7Town 3Scum (Lose 1 scum, 1 town)
D3 6Town 2Scum.
So I would recommend we put some thought into this.[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
@Max Yea, but that has a reason. EA's is more "Oh look! An easy bandwagon! Everyone vote TS!". I dunno, you're probably right.
Also, this may not be MyLo but it easily could be if we lynch the townie;Prosaurus wrote:The thing is, if we choose the townie first, scum have the upper hand. It'd be:
D1 10Town 3Scum (Lose 3 town)
D2 7Town 3Scum (Lose 2 town)
D3 5Town 3Scum (Lose 1 town, 1 Scum)
D4 4Town 2Scum(Edit: This is MyLo)
Unless of course we have a doctor. If we get scum first:
D2 7Town 3Scum (Lose 1 scum, 1 town)
D3 6Town 2Scum.
So I would recommend we put some thought into this.[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
Rhinox wrote:TWISTED HAS NO REASON TO FAKE A GUILTY AS SCUM IN THIS SITUATION. HE WOULD FAKE AN INNO OR BE ROLEBLOCKED. TWISTED IS TOWN, NE IS SCUM. LYNCH NE!!!
Tell me you read this...Me wrote:The thing is, if we choose the townie first, scum have the upper hand. It'd be:
D1 10Town 3Scum (Lose 3 town)
D2 7Town 3Scum (Lose 2 town)
D3 5Town 3Scum (Lose 1 town, 1 Scum)
D4 4Town 2Scum.
Unless of course we have a doctor. If we get scum first:
D2 7Town 3Scum (Lose 1 scum, 1 town)
D3 6Town 2Scum.
So I would recommend we put some thought into this.[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011
Ok. I think NE is scum. He's too aggressive and stuff. Er... Your role makes sense with the other roles (2 1-Shot cops instead of 1 normal cop) and with your posts. I'm not voting because that'd be a hammer, and Dupicity has requested for no one to hammer yet.[Win/Loss-Team]
[2/2 -Town]
[0/0 -Scum]
[0/0 -3rd Party]-
-
Prosaurus Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 483
- Joined: February 21, 2011