Yay! I have time to read some wallz. Since quote walls look ugly, I'm just going to give URL links to posts. I hope everyone's OK with that (if not, too frikin' bad).
Empking, you can't have a playstyle like yours and then bitch about someone discrediting you. If you throw out an unexplained vote, be prepared not to receive any credit in the first place. From my POV, it looks like you jumped on what you thought would be a popular RVS wagon (for the whole thing about neil getting the mafia numbers wrong) and then went into hardcore confirmation bias mode.
Magna [68]: How can you call someone down for a soft-attack after what you said to me in the pre-game?
Duke of Spoon [75]: Why is the fact that there's 2 factions throwing you for a loop? If anything it should make it more explainable to you (there being 2 teams means that all of them being scum doesn't depend on the evidence of bussing). FWIW, I think Empking emerges looking the worst; from what I read (which is admittedly not the whole arguement since it devolved into a slapfight) you can boil his arguments down to strawman (I don't think that's the case here; and I also think you have yet to prove why the strawman is scummy even if you think it exists), AtE (NOT a scumtell), and misrep (which I'm not seeing, either).
DK [99]: At first, this post made me cringe, but I don't think scum would openly admit to not having read their votee's posts. I think they would try to cobble some half-assed case together.
DK [110]: Well, I guess I may have spoken too soon. Here's the half-assed case I was talking about earlier.
DK [124]: That might be the clumsiest attempt to end a conversation I've ever seen. This DK wagon is good.
VOTE: DK
