zMuffinMan wrote:VOTE: DK
DK
I don't trust myself either!
Spadille wrote:Okay, let's quit spooning each other and get to scumhunting. I'll start off:
VOTE: DeityKabuto for throwing away the very sense of RVS, to apply pressure. Applying pressure to one's self is the most useless way of RVS because you are not applying pressure to anyone but yourself. Implying that he has no intention of finding scum because he knows them himself as their scumbuddy.
Snarky wrote:@Low key: Let's get facts straight and clear:
1st quote: 1. Spad vote was random. Why in hell, if I was scum, would I have gotten nervous for that. I was seriously just joking. 2.Spad asked me a question, I answered. I wasn't justifying my vote, as I knew it was random crappy reasoning.
2nd quote: I failed to see DK's selfvote before. I thought it was just a normal random vote. (I failed to make the connection DK-DeityKabuto on my first read)
3rd quote: Ok, that's just wrong. PB feared a scum quicklynch. In order for that to happen, there needed three scum players to quickvote, that's all. That does not mean I think all the players on the wagon are town, but they have to be for a scum quicklynch to happen.
I like my vote where it now. DK still have not explained his self-vote, and his last post was just euhm... yeah.
Spadille wrote:EBWOP for I just got what Archaist said:
I voted DK because he self-voted.. doesn't require a confirmation from him that he did self-vote on RVS.
Snarky wrote:No, I voted him because he self-voted. I hadn't realize he had self-voted in the posts before I voted, but the vote itself was for the self-vote (the I don't trust thing was just another way of saying it, I should have been clearer there.)
I agree with DK being a newb-scum.
Spadile wrote:
Shut up. You are scum OMGUSing.
So to amplify your post, you have made THREE AMAZING OMGUSes. Oh shit!
VOTE: DeityKabuto
Lynch this guy please.
Spadile wrote:Not voting is less scummy than voting for yourself. What do you think a vote does?DeityKabuto wrote:Not-voting is really Anti-town
Spadile wrote:Well, you managed to void the very reason of RVS.DeityKabuto wrote:Furthermore, Spadile. Please, give me three good reasons you find me scummy, as how your vote was placed "upon" me earlier, or was it just apart of the RVS? (*I highly doubt) And do not say I self-voted, that is a silly excus
Furthermore, you concreted the fact that you are not helping town.
Spadile wrote:I don't know if you have some kind of attention problem, but this will not do the town good if you know that you are town yourself. Seems like for me, you are a newb-scum who thinks your actions can be explained by stating you are trolling.DeityKabuto wrote:There is no explanation for a self vote in the RVS, I was aware at the time that I would be questioned for it, but it was more of a trollish thing to do.
Also, you have OMGUS'd alot.
Spadile wrote:DeityKabuto wrote:1. Spadile, you are over-thinking the situation. You guys clearly do not understand my method of scum-hunting.
Which is? Cause confusion to town and self-vote yourself? Yeah right.
Spadile wrote:Yes please, explanation of everything and especially your vote.
Why would you want to keep someone that will hurt the town?
--
@pops
How about DK?
Spadile wrote:DeityKabuto wrote:2. Archaist, as I said, you were one of the last on my bandwagon, unlike the rest who are debating on it, you've only made one post and provided not much "Strong evidence.
Shut up. You are scum OMGUSing.
So to amplify your post, you have made THREE AMAZING OMGUSes. Oh shit!
VOTE: DeityKabuto
Lynch this guy please.
Snarky wrote:Nope, I'm saying your cases are biaised.
Right now, the game is a bit bewildered, half of the game is in one theory, and is confused, and another half also has their own theory. Half of the townies find the other half scummy, and vice-versa. This puts the scum to a major advantage, while the town is caught up in a mix-matched situation like this, the scum have it easier, and can easily determine their next moves, they have the upper hand. While the true townies do not have as much knowledge as the scum, they are at a disadvantage.
DeityKabuto wrote:
Who I am 100% Sure Is Scum: Snarky
Who I suspect to be Scum: Archaist, Spadile
Null reads: SnakePlissken, DonJosh, Toro, popsofctown
Who I suspect to be Town: ZMuffinMan, cjdrum, Parabollocks
Who I am 100% Sure Is Town: DeityKabuto, [Low Key]
Parabollocks wrote:you do realize that's a extremely open window for scum to jo-
continue.
Snarky wrote:Uuh... Wut?
And for the third question, yes I was happy to put a third vote on him because of self-voting. Wagon=pressure=discussion .
Snarky wrote:No, I voted him because he self-voted. I hadn't realize he had self-voted in the posts before I voted, but the vote itself was for the self-vote (the I don't trust thing was just another way of saying it, I should have been clearer there.)
I agree with DK being a newb-scum.
Snarky wrote:DeityKabuto: After reading him in ISO, he's still scum in my mind:
Snarky wrote:
3. I don't like how he has given no opinion, no nothing on people that aren't on his wagon. I know it may be part of your strategy, but still. what do you think of other players?
Archaist wrote:Archaist is not staying anonymous, he's actually quite vocal and has decent cases with decent evidence. I strongly think he's town and will fight for him till death.
Spadile wrote:I ROFL'D. Parab made me look shit? LOLOL. But, with Parab's conversation with me a few pages back, he actually called me town and not made me look like shit, and he said my vote bothers him, not shit. Check your facts, bro.
And that's another kind of thing you are feeling, it's called OMGUDBWM or "Oh My God You Didn't Buddy With Me". Sarcasm aside, I don't like to buddy with scum.
Also, DK, give us 5 good reasons for all of the 'tiers' you did.
However, because I'm obviously buddying with Archaist, VOTE: DK. Also put in addition to my cases earlier.
A DK lynch will confirm Muffin's alignment later.
--------
For those complaining of TunnelVision, I see everything happening around me.
ZMuffinman wrote:Elaborate.Spadile wrote:A DK lynch will confirm Muffin's alignment later.
Spadile wrote:You've tried to defend him by just saying he's funny.
Archaist wrote:I think my list of reasons is quite sufficient. Your "case" against me consists mainly of your claim that my vote is not sufficiently backed up. I think this handily disproves that, and I challenge you to find any other player with five reasons for their vote. However, I will thank you for making me realize that while I have three reasons to vote zMuffinMan, I have six to vote you.
Toro wrote:DeityKabuto - Obv. scum is obvious, he's done nothing really to defend yourself but point his finger back at his bandwagoners and call them all scum. Claims he would start to actively scumhunt earlier but has resorted to the tactic I mentioned in my previous sentence, I say we should go for the vig kill on DK today.
ZMuffinMan wrote:@Spad,
DK isn't "hurting" town.
I think DJ is scum based on his contributions so far (particularly the whole appeasing LK by voting even though it goes against his principles).
LK I'm categorising as scum for meta reasons. I don't like any of his cases so far, and I'm seeing a lot of insincerity.
Snarky is trying way too hard with DK. The push looks like it's coming from scum. Might as well give my view on self-votes in RVS here... RVS is not a method of creating pressure. There is absolutely no pressure exerted by a random vote. It is, however, a means of creating discussion based on what happens during RVS (bandwagons, reasons for voting or not voting, etc). It just so happens that a self-vote creates a lot more discussion than any other vote, especially votes from people who kid themselves into thinking they're creating pressure during RVS, so I have absolutely no problem with self-voting in RVS. I do, however, see a problem with people thinking it's a scum-motivated act just because it's a self-vote.
And you're dangerously close to getting into my third tier of reads, Spad, because your case on para was craptastic (and full of holes + misreps) and it looks to me like you're latching onto the DK wagon because he's an easy target. He's not the best player, that doesn't make him scum. In general, I think you're unnecessarily overly aggressive, but I'm not getting enough of a scum feeling from your posts to classify you as scum yet.
para's posts make perfect sense to me. town vibes. ditto for pops, although I was leaning slightly scummy on him up until ISO#4. I don't like arch's case on DK but it looks more genuine to me than any of the other players on the DK wagon - willing to categorise him as town for now.
And, er, pretty much everyone in my null category apart from you hasn't really given me much to go on.
That's about as much detail as I'm going to go into right now unless someone wants me to go into more detail on a specific read I have. This is a fairly good summary of my reads, though.
ZMuffinMan wrote:And no, I'm not oversimplifying anything here. The only case on DK is "it's possible he's scum"; he hasn't exhibited any scum tells or outright scummy behaviour. People need to find a good reason to be on that wagon or get off it.
[Low Key] wrote:@DK: What is your offsite experience playing Mafia? Have you ever played any Mafia variants that are out there?
[Low Key] wrote:Just for the record, DK's WALL-O-PAIN terribly offended my townie sensibilities. I found that post to be in many ways terribly anti-town. I started to read it with the hopes that maybe somehow he could redeem himself but he only cemented in my mind the necessity of removing him from the game as soon as possible.
We only need one more vote on DK so he will be at L-1 and then one other person to CALL for his hammer (just say you want to hammer) and we can then call for his vig.
Let's all join hands, sing kumbaya and get this thing done.
Toro wrote:[Low Key] wrote:@Muffin: I am encouraged by your last post. Thank you. (I mean that sincerely)
@Toro: Your question to me (when I made that post many pages ago) was a direct dodge of the question that I asked you and I want to know:
1) Why did you dodge that question?
2) Why did you ask the question?
1. I didn't purposefully dodge it. Didn't I answer it just a few posts ago?
2. I was wondering after DK was vigged who would your leading candidate be for a lynch, just a simple question really.
DK 324 wrote:I feel like there's two scum teams,
Say Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaa?
Slip of the year right here folks.
Toro wrote:zMuffinMan wrote:Toro wrote:DK 324 wrote:I feel like there's two scum teams,
Say Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaa?
Slip of the year right here folks.
Oh, come on, really? Not only did Toro-scum take this completely out of context, but he's trying to call it a slip.
How are people so blind to this?
If Toro isn't scum, he's doing a good job acting the part.
Why would he say there's two scum teams then Muffin? He already believed that the people on his wagon were scum, now where'd this second team pop up from?
Snarky wrote:Ok, after Muffin's meta call for defending DK, I took a quick glance at DK's meta and I couldn't find a game where he had a playstyle similar to what he's playing here. Muffin, have you already played with DK before? Is there a specific game you could point out to support your POV of DK? I looked quickly at a game where he was scum, and he seemed to be a little more conservative than he is now (well at least before he claimed goon...), but still, I think I may need more than that to reconsider my position. I don't think meta can clear him at all, but it may be enough to not be able to draw any conclusion on DK's alignment, which may really hurt us. Usually, these kind of players should be lynched anyway because if they troll so much that we can't have any conclusion regarding their alignment then they are hurting the town. However, I really like the idea of going after Toro because it will definitely clear this ambiguity about DK, and get the town out of the stall it actually is.
Do you guys think we should make a mini-unofficial vote count for those who want to follow Muffin's plan and for those who wish to vig DK nontheless? I'm going to unofficially vigvote Toro.
Toro wrote:Seriously, I'm baffled, what's everybody's cases on me again?
zMuffinMan wrote:OK, after Snarky flip, I ruled suspects down to chk, arch, cj, snake, LK
Of that list, I'd be more comfortable getting rid of Arch or LK than the other 3.
First priority for this game is reading the thread with Snarky's flip in mind, second priority is reading Snarky in ISO. Will get around to this some time in the next few hours, prob.
Spadille wrote:Actually, I just want to ask pops this:
How did you know it was Snarky?
Toro wrote:@DK: Please reread the opening posts, there'sno SKin this game.
And if I'm (according to you) the biggest threat to this town, why are you voting for LK then?
I'm starting to re-read now by the way boys and girls.
Spadille wrote:@Muffin
Don't act like your question hasn't still been answered by Archaist.
If you flipped scum, LK is a townie.
If you flipped town, LK's got a ticket to hell since he role-fished and actually made a case out of it.
jilynne1991 wrote:I'm just curious but most people on this website are above the age of 16 right? Since this seems for like an adult-ish website.
popsofctown wrote:DK, cj, and chkflip:
Please review the "pops plan" and either agree to it or give me a solid explanation of why it's bad.
Lynching chkflip or cj before muffin to ensure that my plan gets majority support for the rest of the game works out fine, since we want to lynch them anyway.
@muffin: do you think LK is town?