Mini 1178: Source Code

Empking · Post Post #150 (ISO) » Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:18 pm

Vote Count 7

Hoppster
monk (1) - vezokpiraka
tarsonisocelot
inHimshallibe (1) - earworm
vezokpiraka (2) - monk, inHimshallibe
Ellibereth (1) - tarsonisocelot
earworm
jilynne1991 (1) - Ellibereth

Not Voting: jilynne1991, Hoppster

8 Alive, 5 to Lynch

monk · Post Post #151 (ISO) » Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:14 am

I just went through the thread and did some calculations from my point I have 7 people to know whether or not are scum, we have two ways of neutralising people per day. If we find a scum today with one of the kills we shouldn't use it on the same person tomorrow. I don't like the idea of lynching just to see what happens because we invariably have 4 misses before we lose, that is why we only have three days, I believe from this that there are two scum and we need to kill both in one day in order to win.
That said vezok isn't looking as scummy as he was a bit ago now that I've rationally thought about it. UNVOTE: vezokpiraka VOTE: Ellibereth

tarsonisocelot · Post Post #152 (ISO) » Fri Jun 03, 2011 2:23 am

Anyone object to me vig-ing Hoppster? (Including Hoppster, please tell me why shooting you would be bad.)

Also, I want a D1 lynch.

Hoppster · Post Post #153 (ISO) » Fri Jun 03, 2011 2:26 am

tarsonisocelot wrote:Anyone object to me vig-ing Hoppster? (Including Hoppster, please tell me why shooting you would be bad.)

Umm wat.

Do you have any reasons you want to shoot me for? I can't really defend myself if you make no reasons why you want to shoot me.

It would probably be bad because I assume we need to shoot the people with anti-town win conditions in order to win. I don't understand what you're expecting me to say.

I don't know, maybe we need to shoot innocent people to win. I have no idea. It could be good or bad.

monk · Post Post #154 (ISO) » Fri Jun 03, 2011 3:34 am

I'd rather we vig someone who was scummy. I'm not sure about hoppster being the best option for this. Although I did get alarm bells when he said that he was "Obvtown" I would like to hear other people's thoughts

Hoppster · Post Post #155 (ISO) » Fri Jun 03, 2011 3:38 am

monk wrote:Although I did get alarm bells when he said that he was "Obvtown"

Parama WAS obvtown.

monk · Post Post #156 (ISO) » Fri Jun 03, 2011 3:43 am

Any player can play a game as obvtown regardless of their alignment, at least in my mind they can, while yes I do think you are town I just don't like it when people say oh I'm obviously displaying these characteristics.

Hoppster · Post Post #157 (ISO) » Fri Jun 03, 2011 3:48 am

monk wrote:Any player can play a game as obvtown regardless of their alignment, at least in my mind they can, while yes I do think you are town I just don't like it when people say oh I'm obviously displaying these characteristics.

I wasn't playing obvtown, it was Parama.

monk · Post Post #158 (ISO) » Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:03 am

but you're playing parama's slot so you're basically saying I'm obvtown

Hoppster · Post Post #159 (ISO) » Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:10 am

monk wrote:but you're playing parama's slot so you're basically saying I'm obvtown

I'm not obvtown,

my slot

is obvtown.

I suppose the gist of what I'm saying is don't shoot me unless you want to shoot an obvtown slot, for whatever reason.

Ellibereth · Post Post #160 (ISO) » Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:39 am

Oh hai der.

Ellibereth · Post Post #161 (ISO) » Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:55 am

Vote: Earworm

inHimshallibe · Post Post #162 (ISO) » Fri Jun 03, 2011 7:54 am

Elli!

Cavalry is here imo.

Ellibereth · Post Post #163 (ISO) » Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:20 am

My horsey is wondering what you think of worm ears.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #164 (ISO) » Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:47 am

Ellibereth wrote:My horsey is wondering what you think of worm ears.

Woodchipper material imo.

Nothing compelling at ALL.

I hope you shot vezok, tarsonisocelot.

vote: earworm

Hoppster · Post Post #165 (ISO) » Fri Jun 03, 2011 9:11 am

UNVOTE:
VOTE: earworm

Good bandwagon is good.

I swear I had town-vibes off this guy before. But looking through his ISO, I have no idea what the hell it was from.

I did find this contradiction, though:

monk wrote:Um I've just realised that if we're going small majority I'm at L-2 [/endtroll]

Mod: what is the lynch number?

tarsonisocelot wrote:Monk asking about the lynch limit seems pro-town to me. I'm uncomfortable with the idea of accidental early lynches.

earworm wrote:L-2 is nothing in a game this small. Monk mentioned it, like he should have, but that does not make him town.

later, with a monk bandwagon emerging, earworm wrote:No guys. This Monk nonsense is terrible. He is the towniest person here, especially now that Hoppster took over Parama's spot. Look at Iso #5 and #7 for reasons why.

monk, ISO #5 wrote:Um I've just realised that if we're going small majority I'm at L-2 [/endtroll]

Mod: what is the lynch number?

Yay, it goes round in a pretty circle.

monk · Post Post #166 (ISO) » Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:16 pm

Ok that's L-2, having looked at his defense of me that's incredibly circular and blegh. I may put him up to L-1 but not yet I want to see what everyone else thinks of this bandwagon. Having said that UNVOTE: Elliberith comes out swinging town

monk · Post Post #167 (ISO) » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:32 pm

On actually looking at the reactions to TO's decision, VOTE: inHimshallibe

tarsonisocelot · Post Post #168 (ISO) » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:44 pm

Hoppster wrote:
tarsonisocelot wrote:Anyone object to me vig-ing Hoppster? (Including Hoppster, please tell me why shooting you would be bad.)

Umm wat.

Do you have any reasons you want to shoot me for? I can't really defend myself if you make no reasons why you want to shoot me.

It would probably be bad because I assume we need to shoot the people with anti-town win conditions in order to win. I don't understand what you're expecting me to say.

I don't know, maybe we need to shoot innocent people to win. I have no idea. It could be good or bad.

Param was not obvtown and neither are you.

You've focused rather a lot on the possibility that things which do not usually help the town at all might do so in this case because of "weird mechanics" without providing any specifics of situations where these outcomes might occur.
No Lynch is rarely a good option on D1. Without being presented with a compelling argument related to the specific set up, I will not consider it. You have brought it up "to gauge opinion" more than once.

This defence is another example:

maybe we need to shoot innocent people to win.

And maybe we should try to avoid lynching mafia because then an NPC God might come in and smite them for us.

If you have any concrete reason to suspect that either a no-lynch or shooting town will help, then explain it.

tarsonisocelot · Post Post #169 (ISO) » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:49 pm

inHimshallibe wrote:
Ellibereth wrote:My horsey is wondering what you think of worm ears.

Woodchipper material imo.

Nothing compelling at ALL.

I hope you shot vezok, tarsonisocelot.

vote: earworm

I'm about to shoot Hoppster.
It says so a few posts above yours.
I'm not shooting vezok unless they begin to seem scummy rather than bad-town.
What do you think about that?

UNVOTE: VOTE: inHimshallibe

inHimshallibe · Post Post #170 (ISO) » Fri Jun 03, 2011 2:24 pm

Wait, why the hell would you shoot Hoppster.

monk · Post Post #171 (ISO) » Fri Jun 03, 2011 2:29 pm

her reasoning is in #168, I personally agree with it and find the way you're acting to be sus, that's why my vote is on you

inHimshallibe · Post Post #172 (ISO) » Fri Jun 03, 2011 2:34 pm

Panama was incredibly obvtown imo, can't help it that Hoppster isn't as completely obvious.

tarsonisocelot · Post Post #173 (ISO) » Fri Jun 03, 2011 3:02 pm

inHimshallibe wrote:Panama was incredibly obvtown imo, can't help it that Hoppster isn't as completely obvious.

Explain the obvtown read.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #174 (ISO) » Fri Jun 03, 2011 3:07 pm

You think scum is going to start the game off belittling 5/8 of the game? And risk being run up for no other reason than spite? Yeah no.