Internet Stranger 671 wrote:So let me get this straight.
I note everyone thats trying to simply put lists out there and expecting everyone to follow it as if they were the UN or some sort of useless puppet authority figure that us rightful Americans dont care about.
I note that SpyreX is doing this
I point out that Ooba is doing this
I call out Vi for crapass reasoning and his silly vote
SpyreX plays the distance game from Vi
Ooba jumps on the attack.
How peculiar is it that I mentioned them? Its like the roaches scurrying as soon as I turned the light onto them.
So let me get this straight.
You bring up accusations against a bunch of people for some crappy reasoning that makes me
about your definition of "crapass reasoning".
People respond to you.
These people are now scrambling roaches.
I'm overusing
, so how about another "yeah okay".
---
RedCoyote 676 wrote:We need to lynch
either
AV, dana, ML, Pooky, or SDC today.
In that order.
You might be Euroscum, because English doesn't seem to be your first language.
As usual, your commentary bites. Particularly this.
RedCoyote 676 wrote:This is a horrible vote. Not because of the OMGUS, which makes no difference, but because there is no groundswell for a Vi lynch. Vi is not going to be lynched. Likewise, Vi voting you was just as bad (actually it was probably a little worse) for the same reasons.
1) What makes you think IS isn't getting lynched Today?
2) What makes you think there's no "grounding" for an IS lynch?
3) Are you implying that we should stick to the AV and Hez
bollah
Lucky wagons because they're there?
4) Do you have any alignment reads on either of us? (context clues suggest you're favoring IS)
SDC 678 is more awesome RECKscum posting. RECK is nothing if not transparent.
Moai 679 wrote:Count me in with the group of players who see Vi’s play and think it is suspicious. She’s responding to players and throwing out the occasional soft suspicion but not really working solidly at all to push any of her suspects.
There are a bunch of people I'd love to see dead. IS, SDC, you, LLD, Hinduragi, AV, Mina, Swift Justice, etc. etc. etc.
The person I most believe is scum is IS for reasons stated before.
I only get one vote.
Sure, I COULD jump the AV wagon because it's largest and he's one of the people listed above, but I'm more confident in IS and my vote isn't wasted on him.
RedCoyote 683 wrote:You know what?
Unvote; vote: danakillsu
Either dana or AV would make wonderful lynches, but I'd rather try and prop this wagon up some as the main competitor to the AV wagon (as opposed to the Hez wagon).
@Everyone: If we could make the first lynch a competition between dana and AV, I think we'd be off to such a good start. Both of these lynches are based on very solid ground at this point. Hez, well, not so much.
How about no? You can go on the list from earlier too.
RedCoyote 691 wrote:And every lynch would always benefit from a competitor wagon. Later in the game, after flips have occurred, we can look to these "either or" decisions through the context of VCA.
By "either or" you presumably mean "an okay decision and a relatively poor decision".
RedCoyote 696 wrote:Although I do think they are both scum, I'm realistic enough to think that that would, statistically speaking, be extremely improbable.
That being said, even if it were the case, wagonning two scum on the first day sounds like a good problem to have.
"This is highly improbable BUT WOULDN'T IT BE COOL IF IT WERE TRUE?"
RedCoyote 704 wrote:My intention is not to derail the AV wagon but to prop up the dana wagon.
...which is a bad idea on its own.
I'll tell you what, I'll take your advice.
Unvote: Internet Stranger
Vote: RedCoyote
(L-8 I think)
It physically hurts to pull my vote off IS.
Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.