Mini 1193: Hacker's Panic mafia. (Game Over)

[Hrezs]

ccc

[Hrezs]

vote: kondi

policy lynching it up in this
bobsnox, I promise not to kill you tonight.

Parama, we discussed this in the QT. You can only policy lynch me after D1 so you look better.
VOTE: Parama for not listening.

what

[Hrezs]

like
seriously

what

[Hrezs]

vote: Hrezs

since there's two more scum, and Hrezs is one of them.

Hows this work again? I came back to read the game and the thread was closed.

Also you just called

3

people scum, and said

2

more scum left?

Sounds like a scumslip.

Vote: Parama

Of note: I havent actually read day 1

[Hrezs]

Did some light skimming, I don't like Parama

will do my read through tomorrow

[Hrezs]

day 1:

I agree about Don. If Beck weren't so scummy I would vote Don right now.

Don't like this post, especially because bob didn't actually say why he thought Beck was scummy. Also because Beck flipped town
Mostly for the first point

don't like bobs #106 either, feels like he's trying to add fuel to the fire against beck


not a fan of kondi. He came in, voted Beck to follow Parama, then asked for a claim.


Don't like Parama's #127 'i dont care if you're vig ill lynch you anyways'
very anti town


bobsnox #136
doesn't believe Beck's claim, but unvotes him to let him shoot
..then votes him a again.. a person telling you to lynch them isn't a scumtell

Unvote
Vote bobsnox

[Hrezs]

ninja'd... by 40 minutes...

town points for haschel for having the same top 2 scum targets

[Hrezs]

I find it hilarious that the people who suspect me have done nothing but say I'm scum with no reasoning. Doubly so because 2/3 people doing it I think are scum, one of whom has only been suspicious of me after I voted him

[Hrezs]

Hrezs has posted and isn't voting. There is an 80% chance he is scum.

so... I'm scum because I didn't RVS
note to everyone: I had posted once(twice technically) by the time of this post

I'd totally vote Hrezs because he's scum.

vote: Hrezs

since there's two more scum, and Hrezs is one of them.

Hrezs, Zodiark, don, xvart, and kondi all need to post more; they all have 5 or less posts, and at least one of those is pregame for each.

oh... Too bad the thread was locked when I came back to post

vote: Hrezs

since there's two more scum, and Hrezs is one of them.

Hows this work again? I came back to read the game and the thread was closed.
Also you just called

3

people scum, and said

2

more scum left?
Sounds like a scumslip.

Vote: Parama

BWAHAHAHAHA

There are 2 more scum left besides confscum CooLskins. Nice outrageous misrep there. I'm going to go ahead and say that you're confscum too.

Sup. Skimmed.
I see nobody suspects Hrezs except me.
This is either a sign that I'm crazy or that I hit the nail on the head. Probably a combination of both.
Actual reading will come later.

The truth is that I still feel better about a Hrezs lynch regardless of the fact that you're confirmed scum, because you're confirmed scum mostly for reasons that are beyond your control and have little to do with your posting, whereas Hrezs' posting is basically a scumclaim.
Nah, not basically, it is; especially the one about my "scumslip" as he calls it.

Did some light skimming, I don't like Parama

Holy hell, Zodiark's 242 sucks. "Yay, lemme repeat stuff about don that's already been said. Don't mind me, I don't feel like mentioning the other 9 players at all. Just want to push this wagon. Bye!"
^the feeling I'm getting.

Repeat stuff about don?

anti-town =/= scummy
sigh
and nothing about why I'm scum. neato.you have nothing except this supposed "scumslip" which was just you misrepping me, and blatantly at that. excuse me while I refrain from moving my vote

anti-town and scummy go together a lot of the time. At the very least your attitude was anti-town, at the most it was scumtastic.



great arguments you have there

[Hrezs]

I don't understand the zodiark wagon. Nothing he's done has struck me as scum. Not saying I read him as town, but I don't see the case against him.

[Hrezs]

I don't see zodiark being that careless as scum. I read it as him not having his head in the game and trying to get his feet wet as town.

bob continues to be ridiculously scummy though

[Hrezs]

Bob: hresz is going out of his way to distance himself from the wagon. I see only two reasons for him to do so. 1 he is scum and knows zod is town. 2 he is scum with zod and is planning on using the "why would I have defended my buddy so obviously?" Defense. Either way I see no town motivation for his actions.

Or I'm town who thinks he's town?

I know, its a crazy idea to defend town reads, but you should try it sometime.

[Hrezs]

two posts

OH MAN I'M ACTUALLY TRYING AGAIN WHEEEEE
page 12

Hrezs has posted and isn't voting. There is an 80% chance he is scum.

so... I'm scum because I didn't RVS
note to everyone: I had posted once(twice technically) by the time of this post

Yeah, because town have no reason not to RVS. Scum avoid it out of "caution lul" but that never works.

I have RVS'd once in my mafia career. I was mafia then. I don't do it because I hate it.

Is that REALLY what you're fixating on in this post? You've said nothing on most of my posts, just quoted them for god knows why, and then you come to a post NOT about you and ask an irrelevant question that anybody with a goddamn brain would realize is a stupid question because it requires someone WITHOUT a brain to ASK THE GODDAMN QUESTION?

...repeating stuff about don = repeating stuff about don that others have said and used as an argument against don.

I had no reason to say anything about them because they said nothing. Literally nothing.
And when have I EVER mentioned don?

But this is not what you said.

It was anti-town. The fact that they go together (in addendum to other stuff I didn't like about you) gives more relevence to the anti-townness of the post

your piss poor responses are the most laughable thing I've read all day.

piss poor responses to piss poor arguments. You get what you give

[Hrezs]

Bob: hresz is going out of his way to distance himself from the wagon. I see only two reasons for him to do so. 1 he is scum and knows zod is town. 2 he is scum with zod and is planning on using the "why would I have defended my buddy so obviously?" Defense. Either way I see no town motivation for his actions.

Or I'm town who thinks he's town?

I know, its a crazy idea to defend town reads, but you should try it sometime.

So you believe zodiark is town? It is one thing to think his contradiction is not voteworthy, but it seems to me a bit of a stretch to label him town at this point. Also, you said earlier:

My most recent post (the one that you failed to quote and read)

I don't see zodiark being that careless as scum. I read it as him not having his head in the game and trying to get his feet wet as town.

I thought about it more, and I had a town feel from him earlier

Xvart shouldn't be a blip on the radar today anyway.

Zodiark or Hrezs.

Look at this scum. 'Don't look at this player, but only one of two I'm not scum with'

halfhearted defence against parama, ends up very close to accusing parama of being scum, but doesn't vote for him.

I have never once defended parama
and if you think I almost called zodiark scum I want to see the post

@bobsnox Don's #335 did stand out to me. It paints Hrezs as scum either way for Zodiark and I agree with his statement. I am weary to to hop over as it would put Hrezs at L-1 and I am not necessarily ready to put him in a spot for a quick-hammer. I think Hrezs needs to claim though and is effectively at L-1. I'm willing to bet that Hrezs and Zodiark are scum buddies and would be happy to see either lynched today.

And what if either(which both of us will do in my opinion) of us flips town? Then what will you think

[Hrezs]

I'm VT
will respond to Parama's post in a bit

[Hrezs]

all Parama/bob scum team is possible with Parama calling bob town out of nowhere

[Hrezs]

EBWOP: Also*

[Hrezs]

if you want discussion YOU MAKE DISCUSSION
YOU DONT JUST SIT THERE AND WATCH THINGS HAPPEN

pissed off for non mafia related reasons

congrats
you lynched town